Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2002; 15(02): 97-103
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1632721
Clinical Communication
Schattauer GmbH

Simple and multiple fractures of the radius treated with an external fixator

Comparison of healing of “simple” fractures and multiple fractures of the radius treated with external skeletal fixation in dogs: 56 cases (1983-1999)
P. H. Laverty
1   Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
,
A. L. Johnson
2   Departments of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, Urbana, IL, USA
,
J. P. Toombs
1   Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
,
D. J. Schaeffer
3   Veterinary Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received 24 May 2001

Accepted 28 July 2001

Publication Date:
07 February 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

The medical records of 56 dogs with diaphyseal fractures of the radius and ulna treated with Type lb or Type II external skeletal fixation were reviewed. The patients were referred to the College of Veterinary Medicine University of Illinois or the Purdue University School of Veterinary Medicine during the period from 1983 to 1999. There were thirty-two “simple” fractures and twenty-four multiple fractures. Twenty-four Type II frames and eight Type lb frames were used to treat the “simple” fractures. Twenty Type II frames and four Type lb frames were used to treat the multiple fractures. Eight of the thirty-two dogs with “simple” fractures and twelve of the twenty-four dogs with multiple fractures were admitted with open fractures. Open fractures were associated with a significantly longer time to fracture “bridging” Open reduction was used more frequently for the treatment of dogs with “simple” fractures. Open reduction resulted in greater bone contact at the fracture site. Contact at the fracture site resulted in a shorter time to removal of the external fixation. Clinical union was achieved in fifty of fifty-six fractures, with a mean time to removal of the fixation of 14.2 weeks. Significant difference, in the mean time to fracture “bridging” or the mean time to fixator removal, were not found between the “simple” and multiple fracture groups. Complications occurred in 25% (14/56) of fractures. Complications of fracture healing occurred in 18% (9/56) of fracture repairs, and fracture related complications occurred in 9%. The complications occurred more frequently in dogs weighing under 5 kg. There was not any difference between the “simple” and multiple fracture groups, with respect to the type or frequency of complications experienced. The results of this study indicate that stabilization, with an External Fixator, is an appropriate treatment for both “simple” and multiple diaphyseal fractures of the radius and ulna.

Keywords

Radius/ulna fracture - “simple” - multiple - external fixation - open reduction - autogenous cancellous bone graft
 

  • References

  • 1 Aron DN, Palmer RH, Johnson AL. Biologic strategies and a balanced concept for repair of highly comminuted long bone fractures. Comp Cont Educ Vet Pract 1995; 17: 35-49.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bach AW, Hansen ST. Plate versus external fixation in severe open tibial shaft fractures. ClinOrthop 1989; 241: 89-94.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Baumgaertel F, Gotzen L. The “biological” plate osteosynthesis in multi-fragment fractures of the para-articular femur. A prospective study. Unfallchirurg 1994; 97: 78-84.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Baumgaertel F, Perren SM, Rahn B. Animal experimental studies of ‘‘biological” plate osteosynthesis of multi-fragment fractures of the femur. Unfallchirurg 1994; 97: 19-27.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Bolhofner BR, Carmen B, Clifford P. The results of open reduction and internal fixation of distal femoral fractures using biologic (indirect) reduction techniques. J Orthop Trauma 1996; 10: 372-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bolhofner BR. Indirect reduction and composite fixation of extraarticular proximal tibial fractures. Clin Orthop 1995; 315: 75-83.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Briggs BT, Chao EYS. The mechanical performance of the standard Hoffman - Vidal external fixation apparatus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982; 64-A: 566-73.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Brinker WO, Hohn RB, Prieur WD. eds. Manual of internal fixation in small animals. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1984
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Chao EY, Kasman RA, An KN. Rigidity and stress analyses of external fracture fixation devices - a theoretical approach. J Biomech 1982; 15: 971-83.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Culvenor JA, Parker RJ. Collection of corticocancellous bone graft from the ilium of the dog using an acetabular reamer. J Small Anim Pract 1996; 37: 513-5.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Davidson EB. Vascular injury and delayed hemorrhage after antebrachial external skeletal fixation in a dog. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1997; 10: 75-8.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Dudley M, Johnson AL, Olmstead ML. et al. Open reduction and bone plating stabilization, compared with closed reduction and external fixation, for treatment of comminuted tibial fractures: 47 cases (1980-1995). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1997; 211: 1008-12.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Egger EL, Histand MB, Norrdin RW, Konde LJ, Schwarz PD. Canine osteotomy healing when stabilized with decreasingly rigid fixation compared to constantly rigid fixation. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1993; 182-7.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Gerber C, Mast JW, Ganz R. Biological internal fixation of fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Sur» 1990; 109: 295-303.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Goodship AE, Watkins PE, Rigby HS, Kenwright J. The role of fixator frame stiffness in the control of fracture healing. An experimental study. J Biomech 1993; 26: 1027-35.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Gorse MJ. Using external skeletal fixation for fractures of the radius and ulna and tibia. Vet Med 1998; 463-7.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Green SA. Complications of external skeletal fixation. Clin Orthop 1983; 180: 109-16.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Guerin SR, Lewis DD, Lanz O. et al. Comminuted supracondylar humeral fractures repaired with a modified type I external skeletal fixator construct. J Small Anim Pract J 1998; 39: 525-32.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Harari J, Seguin B, Padgett SL. Principles of external skeletal fixation in small animal surgery. J Vet Med 1998; 445-54.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Heitemeyer U, Kemper F, Hierholzer G, Haines J. Severely comminuted femoral shaft fractures: treatment by bridging-plate osteosynthesis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1987; 106: 327-30.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Johnson AL. Principles of bone grafting. Semin Vet Med Surg [Small Anim] 1991; 06: 90-9.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Johnson AL, Egger EL, Eurell JC, Losonsky JM. Biomechanics and biology of fracture healing with external skeletal fixation. Comp Cont Educ Vet Pract 1998; 20: 487-500.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Johnson AL, Kneller SK, Weigel RM. Radial and tibial fracture repair with external skeletal fixation. Vet Surg 1989; 18: 367-72.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Johnson AL, Seitz SE, Smith CW. et al. Closed reduction and type II external fixation for the treatment of twenty-three severely comminuted fractures of the radius and tibia (1990-1994). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1996; 209: 1445-8.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Johnson AL, Smith CW, Schaeffer DJ. Fragment reconstruction and bone plate fixation versus bridging plate fixation for treating highly comminuted femoral fractures in dogs: 35 cases (1987-1997). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1998; 08: 1157-61.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Kerwin SC, Lewis DD, Elkins AD. Bone grafting and banking. Comp Cont Educ Vet Pract 1991; 13: 1558-66.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Lappin MR, Aron DN, Herron HL, Malnati G. Fractures of the radius and ulna in the dog. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1983; 19: 643-50.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Larsen LJ, Roush JK, McLaughlin RM. Bone plate fixation of distal radius and ulna fractures in small and miniature breed dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1999; 35: 243-50.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Lawyer RB, Lubbers LM. Use of the Hoffman apparatus in the treatment of unstable tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1980; 62-A: 1264-73.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 McCartney W. Use of the modified acrylic external fixator in 54 dogs and 28 cats. Vet Rec 1998; 143: 330-4.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Olds RB, Sinibaldi KR, DeAngelis MP. et al. Autogenous cancellous bone grafting in small animals. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1973; 09: 454-57.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Ostrum RF, Chao EYS, Bassett CAL. et al. Bone injury, regeneration and repair. In: Simon SR. ed. Orthopaedic basic science. American academy of orthopaedic surgeons. 1994: 277-323.
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Perren SM. The concept of biological plating using the limited contact-dynamic compression plate (LC-DCP). Scientific background, design and application. Injury 1991; 22 (Suppl. 01) 1-41.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Perren SM, Cordey J. The concept of interfragmentary strain. In: Uhthoff HK. ed. Current concepts of internal fixation of fractures. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1980: 63-77.
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Perren SM, Klaus Pohler O. et al. The limited contact dynamic compression plate. Arch Orthop Surg 1990; 109: 304-10.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Riemer BL, Foglesong ME, Miranda MA. Femoral plating. Orthop Clin North Am 1994; 25: 625-33.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Rozbruch SR, Muller U, Gautier E, Ganz R. The evolution of femoral shaft plating technique. Clin Orthop 1998; 354: 195-208.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Schena CJ. The procurement of cancellous bone for grafting in small animal orthopedic surgery: A review of instrumentation, technique, and pathophysiology. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1983; 19: 695-701.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Sturmer KM. Elastic plate osteosynthesis, biomechanics, indications and technique in comparison with rigid osteosynthesis. Unfallchirurg 1996; 99: 8129.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Welch JA, Boudrieau RJ, DeJardin LM, Spodnick GJ. The intraosseous blood supply of the canine radius: implications for healing of distal fractures in small dogs. Vet Surg 1997; 26: 57-61.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar