Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1632710
Investigation of a modified reverse saphenous conduit flap in the dog
The authors would like to thank the Western College of Veterinary Medicine Companion Animal Health Fund for their generous support and Dr. Juliane Deubner for artistic and technical support.Publication History
Received
23 February 2001
Accepted
13 July 2001
Publication Date:
08 February 2018 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00035023/200201/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055-s-0038-1632710-1.jpg)
Summary
This experimental study investigated the feasibility of a modified reverse saphenous conduit flap (RSCF). Modified reverse saphenous conduit flaps were harvested bilaterally in 11 experimental dogs. Each flap was based on preservation of either the cranial or caudal branch of the medial saphenous artery and vein, but not both. In five dogs, flaps were elevated from a medial femoral donor site and subsequently sutured into their normal anatomical positions (orthotopic flap). Four of five orthotopic flaps based on the cranial saphenous vessels and three of five orthotopic flaps based on the caudal saphenous vessels survived in their entirety. Orthotopic flaps demonstrated an “all or none” survival pattern. In the second phase, flaps were elevated bilaterally from a medial femoral donor site and transferred to a metatarsal skin defect using a bridging incision in six dogs (heterotopic flaps). Two of six heterotopic flaps, based on the cranial saphenous vessels and two of six based on the caudal saphenous vessels, survived in their entirety. Three flaps, based on the cranial pedicle and two flaps based on a caudal pedicle, experienced partial survival. One flap based on the cranial pedicle and two flaps based on the caudal pedicle experienced total flop failure. Survival of the modified reverse saphenous conduit flap, as described herein, is inconsistent and, therefore, its use cannot be recommended. Additionally, the results suggest that the reverse saphenous conduit flap should be used with caution in cases where trauma or surgery has embarrassed the integrity of either the cranial or caudal vascular branch.
-
References
- 1 Cornell K, Salisbury K, Jacovljevic S. et al. Reverse saphenous conduit flap in cats: an anatomic study. Vet Surg 1995; 24: 202-6.
- 2 Degner DA, Bauer MS, Cozens M. Reverse saphenous conduit flap: a case report in a cat. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1993; 06: 175-7.
- 3 Degner DA, Walshaw R, Lanz O. et al. The medial saphenous fasciocutaneous free flap in dogs. Vet Surg 1996; 25: 105-13.
- 4 Fowler DJ, Degner DA, Walshaw R. et al. Microvascular free tissue transfer: results in 57 consecutive cases. Vet Surg 1998; 27: 406-12.
- 5 Fowler DJ, Miller CW, Bowen V. et al. Transfer of free vascular cutaneous flaps by microvascular anastomosis. Vet Surg 1987; 16: 446-50.
- 6 Pavletic M. Atlas of small animal reconstructive surgery. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co; 1999: 268-9.
- 7 Pavletic MM, Watters J, Henry RW. et al. Reverse saphenous conduit flap in the dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1983; 182: 380-9.
- 8 Remedios AM, Fowler DJ. Axial pattern flaps in the cutaneous reconstruction of lower limb wounds. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1995; 17: 1356-64.
- 9 Swaim SF. Skin grafts. In Vet Clin N Am Small Animal Practice 1990; 20 (01) 147-75.