Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1997; 10(02): 95-100
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1632577
Original Research
Schattauer GmbH

Biomechanical Comparison of Standard Excisional Hip Arthroplasty and Modified Deep Gluteal Muscle Transfer Excisional Arthroplasty

R. T. Dueland
1   From the Comparative Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
,
S. Dogan
2   Department of Medicine, Neurology and the University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
,
R. Vanderby
3   Division of Orthopedic Surgery School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received for publication 12 May 1996

Publication Date:
22 February 2018 (online)

Zoom Image

A comparison of hind limb weight-bearing for standard hip excision (EX) vs. modified deep gluteal excision (MDG) was performed in sixteen hips of eight dogs. Using force plated technology, maximum vertical force was determined in each hind limb at a walk before and at two and four months after the operation. Recovery with both techniques was 67% at two months and 84% at four months after the operation. In conclusion, transfer of a portion of the deep gluteal muscle to the femoral osteotomy site appears not to halve any advantage over standard hip excision. The original deep gluteal transfer technique was not compared.

A portion of this report was presented at the 1995 Veterinary Orthopedic Society meeting, Whistler, B.C. Canada