Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018; 66(S 01): S1-S110
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1627980
Oral Presentations
Monday, February 19, 2018
DGTHG: Valvular Heart Disease - Endocarditis II
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Bowel Evaluation after Surgical Treatment of Streptococcus gallolyticus Subsp. Gallolyticus (Biotype 1) Infective Endocarditis: Should We Aim for In-hospital Evaluation

A. Alozie
1   Department of Cardiac Surgery, Uniklinik Rostock, Rostock, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
22 January 2018 (online)

Objective: Patients presenting with Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus (biotype 1) infective endocarditis are at high risk for occult gastrointestinal neoplasia. Early bowel evaluation reveals occult gastrointestinal neoplasia in a significant percentage of this patient cohort. We sought to evaluate the availability of gastroenteroscopic evaluation results after discharge from the cardio-surgical unit.

Methods: Patients with Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus (biotype 1) infective endocarditis who underwent heart valve surgery between January 2000 and December 2016 were identified from our hospital database. All patients were discharged to rehabilitation centers, primary cardiology units, or home under primary care physician’s care. Respective caregivers were required to schedule a timely gastroenteroscopic evaluation for each patient.

Results: From January 2000 through December 2016, eighteen adults with Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus (biotype 1) infective endocarditis were identified. Follow-up analysis revealed that gastroenteroscopic evaluations were obtained only in 8 (50%) of the patients of which 7(87.5%) had occult gastrointestinal adenomas at different stages of development.

Conclusion: The association between Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus bacteremia and gastrointestinal neoplasia is well established. However, the awareness among physicians involved in the postsurgical care of this patient cohort remains insufficient. Omission to follow-up meticulously places these patients at risk of advanced gastrointestinal neoplasia. We strongly recommend gastroenteroscopy evaluation of these patients prior to discharge from the cardio-surgical unit. In cases where this is not feasible, ambulatory gastroenteroscopic evaluation should be pursued in every single patient.