Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1627455
Minimally Invasive versus Conventional LVAD-Implantation—An Analysis of the Literature
Publication History
09 August 2017
03 January 2018
Publication Date:
28 February 2018 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/thoracic/201903/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055-s-0038-1627455_174902r-1.jpg)
Abstract
This review aims to provide an overview on recent data to evaluate minimally invasive (MVAD) and conventional (CVAD) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted up to April 2017. A total of 183 studies were identified; 13 studies met inclusion criteria. The review revealed a trend toward a lower rate of transfusion, and shorter time for cardiopulmonary bypass, as well as a lower 30-day mortality rate for MVAD. This review indicates that there are possible benefits of minimally invasive LVAD implantation, even though the state of literature is poor.
-
References
- 1 Hill JD, Avery GJ, Egrie G, Turley K, Reichenbach S. Less invasive Thoratec LVAD insertion: a surgical technique. Heart Surg Forum 2000; 3 (03) 218-223
- 2 Gregoric ID, La Francesca S, Myers T. , et al. A less invasive approach to axial flow pump insertion. J Heart Lung Transplant 2008; 27 (04) 423-426
- 3 Anyanwu AC, Itagaki S, Pinney S, Adams DH. Initial experience with routine less invasive implantation of HeartMate II left ventricular assist device without median sternotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2014; 46 (06) 985-990
- 4 Collart F, Feier H, Metras D, Mesana TG. A safe, alternative technique for off-pump left ventricular assist device implantation in high-risk reoperative cases. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2004; 3 (02) 286-288
- 5 Piacentino III V, Singhal AK, Macha M, McClurken JB, Fisher CA, Furukawa S. Off-pump technique for Thoratec left ventricular assist device insertion. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 75 (02) 607-609
- 6 Tittle SL, Mandapati D, Kopf GS, Elefteriades JA. Alternate technique for implantation of left ventricular assist system: left thoracotomy for reoperative cases. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73 (03) 994-996
- 7 Bottio T, Bejko J, Guariento A, Tarzia V, Pittarello D, Gerosa G. Bilateral mini-thoracotomy off-pump Jarvik 2000 implantation in regional asymmetric paravertebral analgesia. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2016; 17 (02) 160-164
- 8 Schmitto JD, Molitoris U, Haverich A, Strueber M. Implantation of a centrifugal pump as a left ventricular assist device through a novel, minimized approach: upper hemisternotomy combined with anterolateral thoracotomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 143 (02) 511-513
- 9 Strueber M, Meyer AL, Feussner M, Ender J, Correia JC, Mohr FW. A minimally invasive off-pump implantation technique for continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: early experience. J Heart Lung Transplant 2014; 33 (08) 851-856
- 10 Makdisi G, Wang IW. Minimally invasive is the future of left ventricular assist device implantation. J Thorac Dis 2015; 7 (09) E283-E288
- 11 Wagner CE, Bick JS, Kennedy J. , et al. Minimally invasive thoracic left ventricular assist device implantation; case series demonstrating an integrated multidisciplinary strategy. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2015; 29 (02) 271-274
- 12 John R, Kamdar F, Eckman P. , et al. Lessons learned from experience with over 100 consecutive HeartMate II left ventricular assist devices. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 92 (05) 1593-1599 , discussion 1599–1600
- 13 Cheung A, Soon JL, Bashir J, Kaan A, Ignaszewski A. Minimal-access left ventricular assist device implantation. Innovations (Phila) 2014; 9 (04) 281-285
- 14 Unsworth B, Casula RP, Yadav H. , et al. Contrasting effect of different cardiothoracic operations on echocardiographic right ventricular long axis velocities, and implications for interpretation of post-operative values. Int J Cardiol 2013; 165 (01) 151-160
- 15 Burger W, Straube M, Behne M. , et al. Role of pericardial constraint for right ventricular function in humans. Chest 1995; 107 (01) 46-49
- 16 Cheung A, Lamarche Y, Kaan A. , et al. Off-pump implantation of the HeartWare HVAD left ventricular assist device through minimally invasive incisions. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 91 (04) 1294-1296
- 17 Rojas SV, Avsar M, Hanke JS. , et al. Improved clinical outcome following a minimally invasive implantation technique for left ventricular assist devices implantation in adults with severe heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 61 (10) E717
- 18 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. ; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151 (04) 264-269 , W64
- 19 The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Online: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp . Accessed May 20, 2015
- 20 Strobe Statement. Online: http://www.strobe-statement.org/index.php?id=available-checklists . Accessed May 30, 2015
- 21 Toma M, Bashir J, Kaan A, Cowan SS, Cheung A, Virani S. Outcomes of minimally invasive vs. conventional implantation of continuous flow left ventricular assist device: a single center experience. J Heart Lung Transplant 2013; 32 (04) S179-S180
- 22 Sileshi B, Haglund NA, Davis ME. , et al. In-hospital outcomes of a minimally invasive off-pump left thoracotomy approach using a centrifugal continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. J Heart Lung Transplant 2015; 34 (01) 107-112
- 23 Klotz S, Bucsky S, Radzewitz S, Karluss A, Sievers HH. Minimal-invasive versus sternotomy for LVAD destination therapy in elective patients. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017; 65 (Suppl. 01) S56
- 24 Kazui T, Suryanarayana PG, Singh S. , et al. A minimally invasive left ventricular assist device surgical approach is more durable at protecting right ventricular function than a full sternotomy. J Heart Lung Transplant 2017; 36: S440
- 25 Haberl T, Riebandt J, Mahr S. , et al. Viennese approach to minimize the invasiveness of ventricular assist device implantation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2014; 46 (06) 991-996 , discussion 996
- 26 Bottio T, Bejko J, Gallo M, Bortolussi G, Gerosa G. Less invasive implantation of HeartWare left ventricular assist device. Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg 2014; 2014 (14) mmu008
- 27 Riebandt J, Haberl T, Wiedemann D. , et al. Mid-term outcomes after limited incision HeartWare ventricular assist device implantation. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017; 65 (Suppl. 01) S56
- 28 Woo YJ, Seeburger J, Mohr FW. Minimally invasive valve surgery. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 19 (04) 289-298
- 29 Ruel M, Shariff MA, Lapierre H. , et al. Results of the minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting angiographic patency study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 147 (01) 203-208
- 30 Kirklin JK, Blackstone EH, Kirklin JW. Cardiopulmonary bypass: studies on its damaging effects. Blood Purif 1987; 5 (2-3): 168-178
- 31 Dandel M, Krabatsch T, Falk V. Left ventricular vs. biventricular mechanical support: decision making and strategies for avoidance of right heart failure after left ventricular assist device implantation. Int J Cardiol 2015; 198: 241-250
- 32 Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Laupacis A, Sackett DL. Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents. Antithrombotic Therapy Consensus Conference. Chest 1992; 102: 305S-311S
- 33 Spitzer WO. The challenge of meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1995; 48 (01) 1-4