PDF herunterladen
Nervenheilkunde 2007; 26(10): 847-852
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1626935
Editorial
Schattauer GmbH

Beobachtet werden

„Gott” bahnt Gutes und ein Beitrag zur Psychologie der Kaffeekasse
M. Spitzer
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
19. Januar 2018 (online)

    Lizenzen und Reprints

 

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Atran S. In gods we trust: The evolutionary landscape of religion. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2002
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Atran S, Norenzayan A. Religion’s evolutionary landscape: Counterintuition, commitment, compassion, communion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2004; 27: 713-730.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Barclay P. Trustworthiness and competitive altruism can also solve the “tragedy of the commons”. Evol Hum Behav 2004; 25: 209-220.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bateson M, Nettle D, Roberts G. Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in real-world setting. Biology Letters 2006; 02: 412-414.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Bering JM, McLeod K, Shackelford TK. Reasoning about dead agents reveals possible adaptive trends. Human Nature 2005; 16: 360-381.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Boyer P. 2001. Religion explained: The evolutionary origins of religious thought. New York, NY: Basic Books; 2001
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Burnham TC, Hare B. Engineering Human Cooperation. Human Nature. 2005 DOI 10.1007/s12110-007–9012–2.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Cauvin J. 1999. The birth of the gods and the origins of agriculture. Watkins T. Trans. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1999
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Fehr E. Don’t lose your reputation. Nature 2004; 432: 449-450.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Fehr E, Fischbacher U. The nature of altruism. Nature 2003; 425: 785-791.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Foucault M. Die Heterotopien/ Der utopische Körper. Zwei Radiovorträge. Zweisprachige Ausgabe, übersetzt von Michael Bischoff. Mit einem Nachwort von Daniel Defert. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp 1966/2005.
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Haley KJ, Fessler DMT. Nobody’s watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game. Evolution and Human Behavior 2005; 26: 245-256.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Henrich JR, Boyd S, Bowles H, Gintis H, Fehr E, Camerer C. „Economic man” in cross-culturel perspective: Ethnography and experiments from 15 small-scale societies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2005; 28: 795-815.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Irons W. How did morality evolve?. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 1991; 26: 49-89.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 15 MacKenzie D. Big Brother’ eyes make us act more honestly. New Scientist. 28.6.2006.
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Milinski M, Semmann D, Krambeck HJ. Donors to charity gain in both indirect reciprocity and political reputation. Proc R Soc B 2002; 269: 881-883.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Milinski M, Semmann D, Krambeck HJ. Reputation helps solve the ‘tragedy of the commons’. Nature 2002; 415: 424-426.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Shariff AF, Norenzayan A. God is watching you. Priming God concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychological Science 2007; 18: 803-809.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Sosis R, Alcorta C. Signaling, solidarity, and the sacred: The evolution of religious behavior. Evolutionary Anthropology 2003; 12: 264-274.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Sosis R, Ruffle BJ. Ideology, religion, and the evolution of cooperation: Field tests on Israeli kibbutzim. Research in Economic Anthropology 2004; 23: 89-117.
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Spitzer M. Mord und Moral im Nahmen Gottes. Nervenheilkunde 2007; 26: 545-552.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Spitzer M. Geld macht einsam. Nervenheilkunde 2007; 26: 119-124.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Spitzer M. Neurotheologie?. Nervenheilkunde 2006; 25: 761-765.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Spitzer M. Das neue Unbewusste. Nervenheilkunde 2006; 25: 615-622.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Spitzer M. Das neue Unbewusste II. Nervenheilkunde 2006; 25: 701-708.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Spitzer M. Bedingungen von Kooperation. Nervenheilkunde 2005; 24: 773-77.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Spitzer M. 2005; b Angst und Untergang. Nervenheilkunde 2005; 24: 257-262.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Spitzer M. Neuroökonomie. Nervenheilkunde 2003; 22: 325-329.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Srull TK, Wyer Jr RS. The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinantss and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1979; 37: 1660-1672.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Wedekind C, Braithwaite VA. The long-term benefits of human generosity in indirect reciprocity. Curr Biol 2002; 12: 1012-1015.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Woods V. Pay up, you are being watched. New Scientist 2005; 2491: 12.
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Galvan FG. et al. Religiosity, denominational affiliation, and sexual behaviors among people with HIV in the United States. Journal of Sex Research 2007; 44: 49-58.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Dennett DC. Breaking the spell. Religion as a natural phenomenon. New York: Viking; 2006: 279.
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Wheatley T, Haidt J. Hypnotic disgust makes moral judgments more severe. Psychological Science 2005; 16: 780-784.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Paul GS. Cross-national correlations of quantifiable societal health with popular religiosity and secularism in the prosperous democracies. A first look. Journal of Religion & Society 2005; 07: 1-17.
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Phillips H. 2007; Is God good?. New Scientist 2007; 2619 (195) 32-36.
    Google Scholar