Nervenheilkunde 2006; 25(11): 969-973
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1626807
Originaler Artikel
Schattauer GmbH

Entscheiden

Im Rahmen von Bernoulli zur Amygdala
M. Spitzer
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
18 January 2018 (online)

 

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Bernoulli D. Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk. Econometrica (1738/1954) 22: 23-36.
  • 2 Bernoulli J. Ars Conjectandi. Basel: Thurnisiorum; 1713
  • 3 Bowles S. Microeconomics. Behavior, institutions, and evolution. New York: Russel Sage Foundation; 2004
  • 4 De Martino B, Kumaran D, Seymour B, Dolan RJ. Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain. Science 2006; 313: 684-7.
  • 5 Hastie R, Dawes RM. Rational choice in an uncertain world. The psychology of judgment and decision making. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2001
  • 6 Kahneman D, Tversky A. Choices, Values, and frames. In: Kahneman D, Tversky A. (Hg) Choices, Values, and Frames, Cambridge: University Press; 2000: S. 1-16.
  • 7 Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory. An analysis if decision under risk. In: Kahneman D, Tversky A. (Hg) Choices, Values, and Frames, Cambridge: University Press; 2000: S. 17-43.
  • 8 McNeil BJ, Pauker SG, Sox Jr HC, Tversky A. On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. New England Journal of Medicine 1982; 306: 1259-62.
  • 9 Miller G. The emotional brain weighs its options. Science 2006; 313: 600-1.
  • 10 Piattelli-Palmarini M. Inevitable Illusions. How mistakes of reason rule our minds. New York: John Wiley; 1994
  • 11 Plous S. The psychology of judgment and decision making. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1993
  • 12 Schelling TC. (1981) Economic reasoning and the ethics of policy. Public Interest 1981; 63: 37-61.
  • 13 Spitzer M. Frontalhirn an Mandelkern. Nervenheilkunde 2004; 23: 431-40.
  • 14 Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 1981; 211: 453-8.
  • 15 Tversky A, Kahneman D. Rational choice and the framing of decisions. In: Kahneman D, Tversky A. (Hg) Choices, Values, and Frames. Cambridge: University Press; 2000: S. 209-23.