Simplifying Arterial Coupling in Microsurgery—A Preclinical Assessment of an Everter Device to Aid with Arterial Anastomosis

Abstract

Background A novel arterial everter device was engineered to simplify microvascular coupling of arteries by reliably securing the stiff, muscular wall of arteries over coupler pins. We compare microvascular coupling with the everter device to manual suturing for arterial anastomoses in a live large animal model.

Materials and Methods In this preliminary study, bilateral external femoral arteries of five male swine were exposed and sharply divided. Arteries were anastomosed using either interrupted sutures (n = 5) or the everter device and Synovis Coupler (n = 5). The efficiency in engaging coupler pins, the time taken to perform the anastomosis, and vessel patency immediately post-op and at 1-week postanastomosis were evaluated. Vessel wall injury and luminal stenosis were compared between groups using histomorphometric analyses.

Results On an average, 80% of coupler pins engaged the vessel walls after a single pass of the everter. The average time to perform the anastomosis was significantly less when using the everter/coupler compared with manual suturing (6:35 minutes versus 25:09 minutes, p < 0.001). Immediately post-op, 100% patency was observed in both groups. At 1 week post-op, four of five (80%) of coupled arteries and all five (100%) of hand-sewn arteries were patent. The degree of arterial wall injury, neointimal formation, and luminal stenosis for patent arteries were similar between groups.

Conclusions Successful arterial anastomoses using the everter device with the Synovis Coupler was easier and significantly more efficient when compared with a standard hand-sewn technique. Both techniques had acceptable patency rates and similar effects on the vessel wall and intima.

Keywords

microsurgery - artery - coupler - anastomosis

• References

• 1 Wade JW, Stephens JA, Bragham RF, Carbo JD. Microsurgery in private practice: is it feasible economically?. Ann Plast Surg 2001; 46 (03) 255-259 , discussion 259–260
• 2 Bonawitz SC. Free tissue transfer in the private practice setting: a review of 100 patients. J Reconstr Microsurg 2009; 25 (05) 331-337
• 3 Saint-Cyr M, Wong C, Schaverien M, Mojallal A, Rohrich RJ. The perforasome theory: vascular anatomy and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (05) 1529-1544
• 4 Grewal AS, Erovic B, Strumas N, Enepekides DJ, Higgins KM. The utility of the microvascular anastomotic coupler in free tissue transfer. Can J Plast Surg 2012; 20 (02) 98-102
• 5 Kulkarni AR, Mehrara BJ, Pusic AL. , et al. Venous thrombosis in handsewn versus coupled venous anastomoses in 857 consecutive breast free flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg 2016; 32 (03) 178-182
• 6 Jandali S, Wu LC, Vega SJ, Kovach SJ, Serletti JM. 1000 consecutive venous anastomoses using the microvascular anastomotic coupler in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (03) 792-798
• 7 Zhang T, Lubek J, Salama A. , et al. Venous anastomoses using microvascular coupler in free flap head and neck reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 70 (04) 992-996
• 8 Shindo ML, Costantino PD, Nalbone VP, Rice DH, Sinha UK. Use of a mechanical microvascular anastomotic device in head and neck free tissue transfer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996; 122 (05) 529-532
• 9 Chow SP. The histopathology of microvascular anastomosis: a study of the incidence of various tissue changes. Microsurgery 1983; 4 (01) 5-9
• 10 Yoshida WB, Naresse LE, Rodriques AC, Fabris VE, Angeleli AY. End-to-end arterial anastomosis with fibrin glue in larger arteries: histology, hydroxyproline concentration and tensile strength study in carotids of rabbits. Acta Cir Bras 2002; 17 (01) 4-11
• 11 Yap LH, Constantinides J, Butler CE. Venous thrombosis in coupled versus sutured microvascular anastomoses. Ann Plast Surg 2006; 57 (06) 666-669
• 12 DeLacure MD, Kuriakose MA, Spies AL. Clinical experience in end-to-side venous anastomoses with a microvascular anastomotic coupling device in head and neck reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999; 125 (08) 869-872
• 13 Barker EV, Enepekides DJ. The utility of microvascular anastomotic devices in head and neck reconstruction. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008; 16 (04) 331-334
• 14 Rozen WM, Whitaker IS, Acosta R. Venous coupler for free-flap anastomosis: outcomes of 1,000 cases. Anticancer Res 2010; 30 (04) 1293-1294
• 15 Fitzgerald O'Connor E, Rozen WM, Chowdhry M. , et al. The microvascular anastomotic coupler for venous anastomoses in free flap breast reconstruction improves outcomes. Gland Surg 2016; 5 (02) 88-92
• 16 Chernichenko N, Ross DA, Shin J, Chow JY, Sasaki CT, Ariyan S. Arterial coupling for microvascular free tissue transfer. Otolayrngol Head Neck Surg 2008; 138 (05) 614-618
• 17 Spector JA, Draper LB, Levine JP, Ahn CY. Routine use of microvascular coupling device for arterial anastomosis in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2006; 56 (04) 365-368
• 18 Spector JA, Draper LB, Levine JP, Ahn CY. A technique for atraumatic microvascular arterial coupling. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (06) 1968-1969
• 19 Shippert RD. A study of time-dependent operating room fees and how to save $100 000 by using time-saving products. Am J Cosmet Surg 2005; 22 (01) 25-34