RSS-Feed abonnieren
Bitte kopieren Sie die angezeigte URL und fügen sie dann in Ihren RSS-Reader ein.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/de/10.1055-s-00034924.xml
Nuklearmedizin 2004; 42(04): 105-106
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1625311
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1625311
Editorial
Comparing apples with addled pears
The need to optimize study protocols to compare imaging modalities for assessing myocardial perfusionWeitere Informationen
Publikationsverlauf
Publikationsdatum:
10. Januar 2018 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00034924/200404/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055s-0038-1625311-1.jpg)
-
References
- 1 Klocke FJ, Baird MG, Lorell BH. et al., American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Society for Nuclear Cardiology.. ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging – executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging). Circulation 2003; 108: 1404-18.
- 2 Knapp WH. Guidelines for myocardial per-fusion scintigraphy. Nuklearmedizin 1999; 38: 226-9.
- 3 Schäfers M. Methods and clinical applications in nuclear cardiology: a position statement. Nuklearmedizin 2002; 41: 3-13.
- 4 Underwood SR, Anagnostopoulos C, Cerqueira M. et al. British Cardiac Society, British Nuclear Cardiology Society, British Nuclear Medicine Society, Royal College of Physicians of London, Royal College of Radiologists.. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: the evidence. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2004; 31: 261-91.