Pneumologie 2018; 72(S 01): S23
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1619178
Sektion 7 – Klinische Pneumologie
Posterbegehung – Titel: Diagnostik und Methoden in der Pneumologie
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Diagnosing diffuse parenchymal lung disease (DPLD) by non-invasive breath screening of exhaled volatile compounds using an electronic nose: a pilot study

E Krauss
1   European IPF Registry & Biobank (eurIPFreg), Universities of Gießen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Excellence Cluster Cardiopulmonary System (ECCPS), Gießen
,
J Zoelitz
1   European IPF Registry & Biobank (eurIPFreg), Universities of Gießen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Excellence Cluster Cardiopulmonary System (ECCPS), Gießen
,
J Wagner
1   European IPF Registry & Biobank (eurIPFreg), Universities of Gießen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Excellence Cluster Cardiopulmonary System (ECCPS), Gießen
,
R Dartsch
2   Agaplesion Lung Clinic Waldhof-Elgershausen, Greifenstein
,
W Seeger
1   European IPF Registry & Biobank (eurIPFreg), Universities of Gießen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Excellence Cluster Cardiopulmonary System (ECCPS), Gießen
,
A Günther
3   European IPF Registry & Biobank (eurIPFreg), Universities of Gießen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Excellence Cluster Cardiopulmonary System (ECCPS), Gießen; Agaplesion Lung Clinic Waldhof-Elgershausen, Greifenstein
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
21 February 2018 (online)

 

Background:

The diffuse parenchymal lung diseases (DPLD) is a big group of pulmonary inflammatory and/or fibrosing diseases with diverse natural courses; some of them, i.e. idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) are associated with high mortality rate. The patient's survival depends on timing of correct diagnosis. We conducted this single-center trial to evaluate, if a rapid, point-of-care, and easy-to-use diagnostic tool, such as the electronic nose Aeonose®, would be able to differentiate between DPLDs and healthy state.

Methods:

The electronic nose signatures of exhaled volatile compounds of 116 patients with DPLD were captured using the Aeonose® and compared to a cohort of 42 healthy subjects. Area under Curve (AUC) and Matthews correlation coefficient (MC) were used to interpret the Aeonose® data.

Results:

The Aeonose® was able to differentiate between IPF-patients (n = 62) and healthy controls, showing an AUC of 0.92 and MC of 0.71. In comparison between cryptogenic organizing pneumonitis (COP, n = 30) vs. healthy, an AUC of 0.86 and MC of 0.7 were obtained. In case of patients with connective tissue diseases – ILD (CT-ILD, n = 24) vs. healthy, an AUC of 0.89 and MC of 0.7 were encountered.

Conclusions:

Based on exhaled volatile compounds, the Aeonose® shows promising potential in capturing disease-specific signatures in IPF, COP or CT-ILD and may therefore be suited to improve the efficacy and accuracy of a specific diagnosis in ILDs. However, additional studies validating these results in a larger cohort and more complex, multivariate statistical analyses are necessary to further document the usefulness of this device.