Download PDF
Thromb Haemost 2001; 85(06): 995-998
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1615953
Review Article
Schattauer GmbH

Diagnostic Accuracy of Triage Tests to Exclude Pulmonary Embolism

Melvin R. Mac Gillavry
1   Department of Internal Medicine, Slotervaart Hospital, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
Jeroen G. Lijmer
2   Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
Bernd-Jan Sanson
3   Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
Harry R. Büller
3   Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
Dees P. M. Brandjes
1   Department of Internal Medicine, Slotervaart Hospital, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
3   Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
the ANTELOPE-Study Group › Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received 16 August 2000

Accepted after resubmission 13 February 2001

Publication Date:
12 December 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

We performed a study in 403 prospectively included patients with suspected pulmonary embolism to compare the accuracy of a combination of the SimpliRED D-dimer assay and an intuitive clinical probability estimate with either one alone. Based on a conjoint diagnostic reference standard, including ventilation-perfusion lung scintigraphy and pulmonary angiography, the prevalence of pulmonary embolism was 31%. We demonstrated a high sensitivity (98%, 95% CI 95-100) and negative predictive value (94%, 95% CI 79-99) for the combination of the two tests. These figures were more favorable than for either test alone. The specificity of the combination was lower (11%, 95% CI 9-12) and consequently the proportion of patients in whom further diagnostic tests would have been avoided was only 8%. We conclude that the combined use of the SimpliRED test and the clinical probability estimate attains a higher sensitivity than either test alone. However, there remains a risk of false negatives and the exclusion efficiency is limited.

Key words

Pulmonary embolism - diagnosis - D-dimer - probability - estimate - triage

** The investigators who participated in this study are listed in the appendix. The Dutch Health Insurance Council (project # D094-90) provided financial support for this study. HRB is an established investigator of the Dutch Heart Foundation.


 

  • References

  • 1 Hull RD, Hirsh J, Carter CJ, Raskob GE, Gill GJ, Jay RM, Leclerc JR, David M, Coates G. Diagnostic value of ventilation-perfusion long scanning in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Chest 1985; 88: 819-28.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 The PIOPED Investigators.. Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. Results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED). JAMA 1990; 263: 2753-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Kuijer PM, Turkstra F, van Beek EJ, ten Cate JW, Büller HR. A survey of the diagnostic and therapeutic management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism in the Netherlands. Neth J. Med 1997; 50: 261-6.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bury RF, Smith AH. Out of hours scintigraphy: a survey of current practice. Nucl Med Comm 1993; 14: 126-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Cooper TJ, Hayward MWJ, Hartog M. Survey on the use of pulmonary scintigraphy and angiography for suspected pulmonary thromboembolism in the UK. Clin Radiol 1991; 43: 243-5.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Becker DM, Philbrick JT, Bachhuber TL, Humphries JE. D-dimer testing and acute venous thromboembolism. A shortcut to accurate diagnosis? Arch Intern Med 1996; 156: 939-46.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bounameaux H, de Moerloose P, Perrier A, Miron MJ. D-dimer testing in suspected venous thromboembolism: an update. QJM 1997; 90: 437-42.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Ginsberg JS, Wells PS, Brill-Edwards P, Donovan D, Panju A, van Beek EJR, Patel A. Application of a novel and rapid whole blood assay for D-dimer in patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism. Thromb Haemost 1995; 73: 35-8.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Turkstra F, van Beek EJR, ten Cate JW, Büller HR. Reliable rapid blood test for the exclusion of venous thromboembolism in symptomatic outpatients. Thromb Haemost 1996; 76: 9-11.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Freyburger G, Trillaud H, Labrouche S, Gauthier P, Javorschi S, Bernard P, Grenier N. D-dimer strategy in thrombosis exclusion – a gold standard study in 100 patients suspected of deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism: 8 methods compared. Thromb Haemost 1998; 79: 32-7.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Ginsberg JS, Wells PS, Kearon C, Anderson D, Crowther M, Weitz JI, Bormanis J, Brill-Edwards P, Turpie AG, MacKinnon B, Gent M, Hirsh J. Sensitivity and specificity of a rapid whole-blood assay for D-dimer in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med 1998; 129: 1006-11.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, Ginsberg JS, Kearon C, Gent M, Turpie AG, Bormanis J, Weitz JI, Chamberlain M, Bowie D, Barnes D, Hirsh J. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer. Thromb Haemost 2000; 83: 416-20.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 John MA, Elms MJ, O’Reilly EJ, Rylatt DB, Bundesen PG, Hillyard CJ. The SimpliRED D-dimer test: a novel assay for the detection of crosslinked fibrin degradation products in whole blood. Thromb Res 1990; 58: 273-81.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Sanson BJ, Lijmer JG, Mac Gillavry MR, Turkstra F, Prins MH. Büller HR on behalf of the ANTELOPE-Study Group.. Comparison of a clinical probability estimate and two clinical models in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Thromb Haemost 2000; 83: 199-203.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Perrier A, Desmarais S, Miron M-J, de Moerloose P, Lepage R, Slosman D, Didier D, Unger P-F, Patenaude J-V, Bounameaux H. Non-invasive diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in outpatients. Lancet 1999; 353: 190-5.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Lensing AWA, van Beek EJR, Demers C, Tiel-van Buul MMC, Yakemchuk V, van Dongen A, Coates G, Ginsberg JS, Hirsh J, ten Cate JW, Büller HR. Ventilation-perfusion lung scanning and the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: improvement of observer agreement by the use of a lung segment reference chart. Thomb Haemost 1992; 68: 245-9.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Stein PD, Athanasoulis C, Alavi A, Greenspan RH, Hales CA, Saltzman HA, Vreim CE, Terrin ML, Weg JG. Complications and validity of pulmonary angiography in acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation 1992; 85: 462-8.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 van Beek EJR, Reekers JA, Batchelor DA, Brandjes DP, Büller HR. Feasibility, safety and clinical utility of angiography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Eur Radiol 1996; 6: 415-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Stein P, Henry JW, Relyea B. Untreated patients with pulmonary embolism. Outcome, clinical, and laboratory assessment. Chest 1995; 107: 931-5.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S, Bonsel GJ, Prins MH, van der Meulen JHP, Bossuyt PMM. Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA 1999; 282: 1061-6.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Lachs MS, Nachamkin I, Edelstein PH, Goldman J, Feinstein AR, Schwartz JS. Spectrum bias in the evaluation of diagnostic tests: lessons from the rapid dipstick for urinary tract infection. Ann Intern Med 1992; 117: 135-40.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Ransohoff DF, Feinstein AR. Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests. N Engl J Med 1978; 299: 926-30.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Turkstra F, van Beek EJR, Büller HR. Observer and biological variation of a rapid whole blood D-dimer test. Thromb Haemost 1998; 78: 91-3.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar