Otoplasty Online Information: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Websites and Videos that Patients View Regarding Cosmetic Ear Surgery

Abstract

Physicians should be aware of both websites and videos available online regarding the otoplasty procedure to provide quality care. This study systematically analyzes the authorships, reliability, quality, and readability of the websites, as well as the authorships and primary objectives of the videos regarding otoplasty. Validated instruments were used to analyze the reliability, quality, and readability of websites, and videos were systematically categorized and analyzed. A Google search was conducted, and the first five pages of results were included in this study. After excluding unrelated websites, the remaining 44 websites were categorized by authorship (physician, patient, academic, or unaffiliated) and were analyzed using the validated DISCERN instrument for reliability and quality, as well as various other validated instruments to measure readability. A YouTube search was also conducted, and the first 50 relevant videos were included in the study. These videos were categorized by authorship and their primary objective. Website authorships were physician-dominated. Reliability, quality, and overall DISCERN score differ between the four authorship groups by a statistically significant margin (Kruskall–Wallis test, p < 0.05). Unaffiliated websites were the most reliable, and physician websites were the least reliable. Academic websites were of the highest quality, and patient websites were of the lowest quality. Readability did not differ significantly between the groups, though the readability measurements made showed a general lack of material easily readable by the general public. YouTube was likewise dominated by physician-authored videos. While the physician-authored videos sought mainly to inform and to advertise, patient-authored videos sought mainly to provide the patient's perspective. Academic organizations showed very little representation on YouTube, and the YouTube views on otoplasty videos were dominated by the top 20 videos, which represented over 93% of the total views of videos included in this study.

Keywords

otoplasty - DISCERN - readability - websites - videos - online information - patient education - Google - YouTube

Financial Disclosures

None.

• References

• 1 World Internet Users Statistics and 2017 World Population Stats. http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm . Accessed June 23, 2017
• 2 Information Triage | Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/15/information-triage/ . Accessed June 23, 2017
• 3 Hong P, Gorodzinsky AY, Taylor BA, Chorney JML. Parental decision making in pediatric otoplasty: the role of shared decision making in parental decisional conflict and decisional regret. Laryngoscope 2016; 126 (Jun, Suppl 5): S5-S13
• 4 Papsin E, Haworth R, Chorney JM, Bezuhly M, Hong P. Pediatric otoplasty and informed consent: do information handouts improve parental risk recall?. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 78 (12) 2258-2261
• 5 American Society of Plastics Surgeons. Plastic Surgery Statistics Report 2013. 2014:1–23. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Plastic+Surgery+Statistics+Report#1
• 6 Braun T, Berghaus A. Ohranlegung und lebensqualität. HNO 2015; 63 (01) 28-33 , 30–33
• 7 Papadopulos NA, Niehaus R, Keller E. , et al. The psychologic and psychosocial impact of otoplasty on children and adults. J Craniofac Surg 2015; 26 (08) 2309-2314
• 8 Carroll J. Legal examination of physician advertising on the internet. Facial Plast Surg 2006; 22 (01) 75-79
• 9 Rayess H, Zuliani GF, Gupta A. , et al. Critical analysis of the quality, readability, and technical aspects of online information provided for neck-lifts. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2017; 19 (02) 115-120
• 10 Butler L, Foster NE. Back pain online: a cross-sectional survey of the quality of web-based information on low back pain. Spine 2003; 28 (04) 395-401
• 11 Beredjiklian PK, Bozentka DJ, Steinberg DR, Bernstein J. Evaluating the source and content of orthopaedic information on the Internet. The case of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000; 82-A (11) 1540-1543
• 12 Neuman HB, Cabral C, Charlson ME, Temple LK. Is internet information adequate to facilitate surgical decision-making in familial adenomatous polyposis?. Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50 (12) 2135-2141
• 13 Purcell GP, Wilson P, Delamothe T. The quality of health information on the internet. BMJ 2002; 324 (7337): 557-558
• 14 Nissan ME, Gupta A, Carron J, Rayess H, Carron M. Rhytidectomy: analysis of videos available online. Facial Plast Surg 2017; 33 (03) 311-315
• 15 Svider PF, Agarwal N, Choudhry OJ. , et al. Readability assessment of online patient education materials from academic otolaryngology-head and neck surgery departments. Am J Otolaryngol 2013; 34 (01) 31-35
• 16 How to Write Easy-to-Read Health Materials. MedlinePlus. https://medlineplus.gov/etr.html . Accessed June 26, 2017
• 17 Colaco M, Svider PF, Agarwal N, Eloy JA, Jackson IM. Readability assessment of online urology patient education materials. J Urol 2013; 189 (03) 1048-1052
• 18 Misra P, Agarwal N, Kasabwala K, Hansberry DR, Setzen M, Eloy JA. Readability analysis of healthcare-oriented education resources from the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Laryngoscope 2013; 123 (01) 90-96
• 19 Kasabwala K, Agarwal N, Hansberry DR, Baredes S, Eloy JA. Readability assessment of patient education materials from the American Academy of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012; 147 (03) 466-471
• 20 Saraç S, Afşar GÇ, Oruç Ö, Topçuoğlu ÖB, Saltürk C, Peker Y. Impact of patient education on compliance with positive airway pressure treatment in obstructive sleep apnea. Med Sci Monit 2017; 23: 1792-1799