Download PDF
Thromb Haemost 2003; 89(02): 407-408
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1613459
Letters to the Editor
Schattauer GmbH

A reply to rebuttal: What is the risk of withholding anticoagulation in those with a low probability ventilation perfusion scan in the investigation of pulmonary emboli?

Stephen Iles
,
Ian Town
Further Information

Publication History

Reiceved 11 November 2002

Accepted 11 November 2002

Publication Date:
07 December 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

 

 

  • References

  • 1 Perrier A, Bounameaux H. A Rebuttal: What is the risk of withholding anticoagulation in those with a low probability Ventilation Perfusion Scan: An unacceptable Risk. Thromb Haemost 2002; 88: 702
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Iles S, Egermayer P, Hlavac M, Turner J, Town GI. What is the risk of withholding anticoagulation in those with a low probability Ventilation Perfusion Scan in the investigation of Pulmonary Emboli?. Thromb Haemost 2002; 87: 772
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Egermayer P, Town GITurner. et al Usefulness of D-dimer, blood gas and respiratory rate measurements for excluding pulmonary embolism. Thorax 1998; 53: 830-4.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar