J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34(03): 185-192
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1607363
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Defining the Role of Free Flaps in Partial Breast Reconstruction

Mark L. Smith
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Northwell Health System, Lake Success, New York
,
Bianca J. Molina
2   Division of Plastic Surgery, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, New York
,
Erez Dayan
3   Division of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Eric M. Jablonka
4   Division of Plastic Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
,
Michelle Okwali
2   Division of Plastic Surgery, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, New York
,
Julie N. Kim
2   Division of Plastic Surgery, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, New York
,
Joseph H. Dayan
5   Division of Plastic Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

05 March 2017

14 September 2017

Publication Date:
12 November 2017 (online)

Abstract

Background Free flaps have a well-established role in breast reconstruction after mastectomy; however, their role in partial breast reconstruction remains poorly defined. We reviewed our experience with partial breast reconstruction to better understand indications for free tissue transfer.

Methods A retrospective review was performed of all patients undergoing partial breast reconstruction at our center between February 2009 and October 2015. We evaluated the characteristics of patients who underwent volume displacement procedures versus volume replacement procedures and free versus pedicled flap reconstruction.

Results There were 78 partial breast reconstructions, with 52 reductions/tissue rearrangements (displacement group) and 26 flaps (replacement group). Bra cup size and body mass index (BMI) were significantly smaller in the replacement group. Fifteen pedicled and 11 free flaps were performed. Most pedicled flaps (80.0%) were used for lateral or upper pole defects. Most free flaps (72.7%) were used for medial and inferior defects or when there was inadequate donor tissue for a pedicled flap. Complications included hematoma, cellulitis, and one aborted pedicled flap.

Conclusion Free and pedicled flaps are useful for partial breast reconstruction, particularly in breast cancer patients with small breasts undergoing breast-conserving treatment (BCT). Flap selection depends on defect size, location, and donor tissue availability. Medial defects are difficult to reconstruct using pedicled flaps due to arc of rotation and intervening breast tissue. Free tissue transfer can overcome these obstacles. Confirming negative margins before flap reconstruction ensures harvest of adequate volume and avoids later re-operation. Judicious use of free flaps for oncoplastic reconstruction expands the possibility for breast conservation.

 
  • References

  • 1 Kronowitz SJ, Feledy JA, Hunt KK. , et al. Determining the optimal approach to breast reconstruction after partial mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (01) 1-11 , discussion 12–14
  • 2 Gabka CJ, Bohmert H. Future prospects for reconstructive surgery in breast cancer. Semin Surg Oncol 1996; 12 (01) 67-75
  • 3 Kronowitz SJ, Kuerer HM, Buchholz TA, Valero V, Hunt KK. A management algorithm and practical oncoplastic surgical techniques for repairing partial mastectomy defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (06) 1631-1647
  • 4 Hennigs A, Biehl H, Rauch G. , et al. Change of patient-reported aesthetic outcome over time and identification of factors characterizing poor aesthetic outcome after breast-conserving therapy: long-term results of a prospective cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23 (05) 1744-1751
  • 5 Cochrane RA, Valasiadou P, Wilson ARM, Al-Ghazal SK, Macmillan RD. Cosmesis and satisfaction after breast-conserving surgery correlates with the percentage of breast volume excised. Br J Surg 2003; 90 (12) 1505-1509
  • 6 Asgeirsson KS, Rasheed T, McCulley SJ, Macmillan RD. Oncological and cosmetic outcomes of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 2005; 31 (08) 817-823
  • 7 Zaha H. Oncoplastic volume replacement technique for the upper inner quadrant using the omental flap. Gland Surg 2015; 4 (03) 263-269
  • 8 Zaha H, Sunagawa H, Kawakami K, Touyama T, Yonaha T, Ohshiro N. Partial breast reconstruction for an inferomedial breast carcinoma using an omental flap. World J Surg 2010; 34 (08) 1782-1787
  • 9 Rainsbury RM. Breast-sparing reconstruction with latissimus dorsi miniflaps. Eur J Surg Oncol 2002; 28 (08) 891-895
  • 10 Spiegel AJ, Eldor L. Partial breast reconstruction with mini superficial inferior epigastric artery and mini deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps. Ann Plast Surg 2010; 65 (02) 147-154
  • 11 McCulley SJ, Macmillan RD, Rasheed T. Transverse Upper Gracilis (TUG) flap for volume replacement in breast conserving surgery for medial breast tumours in small to medium sized breasts. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011; 64 (08) 1056-1060
  • 12 Smith ML, Evans GR, Gürlek A. , et al. Reduction mammaplasty: its role in breast conservation surgery for early-stage breast cancer. Ann Plast Surg 1998; 41 (03) 234-239
  • 13 Noguchi M, Saito Y, Taniya T. , et al. Wide resection with latissimus dorsi muscle transposition in breast conserving surgery. Surg Oncol 1992; 1 (03) 231-236
  • 14 Yang JD, Lee JW, Kim WW, Jung JH, Park HYJ. Oncoplastic surgical techniques for personalized breast conserving surgery in breast cancer patient with small to moderate sized breast. J Breast Cancer 2011; 14 (04) 253-261
  • 15 Yang JD, Kim MC, Lee JW. , et al. Usefulness of oncoplastic volume replacement techniques after breast conserving surgery in small to moderate-sized breasts. Arch Plast Surg 2012; 39 (05) 489-496
  • 16 Park HC, Kim HY, Kim MC. , et al. Partial breast reconstruction using various oncoplastic techniques for centrally located breast cancer. Arch Plast Surg 2014; 41 (05) 520-528
  • 17 Lee JW, Kim MC, Park HY, Yang JD. Oncoplastic volume replacement techniques according to the excised volume and tumor location in small- to moderate-sized breasts. Gland Surg 2014; 3 (01) 14-21
  • 18 Hamdi M, Van Landuyt K, de Frene B, Roche N, Blondeel P, Monstrey S. The versatility of the inter-costal artery perforator (ICAP) flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006; 59 (06) 644-652
  • 19 Rose M, Manjer J, Ringberg A, Svensson H. Surgical strategy, methods of reconstruction, surgical margins and postoperative complications in oncoplastic breast surgery. Eur J Plast Surg 2014; 37: 205-214
  • 20 Hamdi M. Oncoplastic and reconstructive surgery of the breast. Breast 2013; 22 (Suppl. 02) S100-S105
  • 21 Ogawa T, Hanamura N. Oncoplastic surgery combining abdominal advancement flaps with volume displacement techniques to breast-conserving surgery for small- to medium-sized breasts. Breast Cancer 2016; 23 (06) 932-938
  • 22 Nahabedian MY, Patel KM, Kaminsky AJ, Cocilovo C, Miraliakbari R. Biplanar oncoplastic surgery: a novel approach to breast conservation for small and medium sized breasts. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (05) 1081-1084
  • 23 Rizzuto RP, Allen RJ. Reconstruction of a partial mastectomy defect with the superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap. J Reconstr Microsurg 2004; 20 (06) 441-445 , discussion 446
  • 24 Serletti JM, Higgins J, Carras AJ. Free latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for secondary breast reconstruction after partial loss of a TRAM flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 100 (03) 690-694
  • 25 Fosh B, Hainsworth A, Beumer J, Howes B, McLeay W, Eaton M. Cosmesis outcomes for sector resection for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Ann Surg Oncol 2014; 21 (04) 1271-1275
  • 26 Losken A, Pinell-White X, Hodges M, Egro FM. Evaluating outcomes after correction of the breast conservation therapy deformity. Ann Plast Surg 2015; 74 (Suppl. 04) S209-S213