Semin Plast Surg 2017; 31(04): 214-221
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1607201
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Osseointegrated Implants and Prosthetic Reconstruction Following Skull Base Surgery

Shirley Hu
1   Division of Facial Plastic Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York
,
Demetri Arnaoutakis
2   Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
,
Sameep Kadakia
1   Division of Facial Plastic Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York
,
Allison Vest
3   Medical Art Prosthetics, LLC, McKinney, Texas
,
Raja Sawhney
4   Division of Facial Plastic Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida
,
Yadranko Ducic
5   Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery Associates, Fort Worth, Texas
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
25 October 2017 (online)

Abstract

Rehabilitation following ablative skull base surgery remains a challenging task, given the complexity of the anatomical region, despite the recent advances in reconstructive surgery. Remnant defects following resection of skull base tumors are often not amenable to primary closure. As such, numerous techniques have been described for reconstruction, including local rotational muscle flaps, pedicled flaps with skin paddle, or even free tissue transfer. However, not all patients are appropriate surgical candidates and therefore may instead benefit from nonsurgical options for functional and aesthetic restoration. Osseointegrated implants and biocompatible prostheses provide a viable alternative for such a patient population. The purpose of this review serves to highlight current options for prosthetic rehabilitation of skull base defects and describe their indications, advantages, and disadvantages.

 
  • References

  • 1 Gibson MK, Forastiere AA. Multidisciplinary approaches in the management of advanced head and neck tumors: state of the art. Curr Opin Oncol 2004; 16 (03) 220-224
  • 2 Bhandari S. Prosthetic considerations in oral and maxillofacial trauma. Journal of Postgraduate Med Educ Res 2014; 48 (02) 87-90
  • 3 Thaller SR, Bradley JP, Garri JI. Craniofacial Surgery. New York, NY: Informa Healthcare, Inc.; 2008
  • 4 Wiens JP, Wiens RL. Psychological management of the maxillofacial prosthetic patient. In: Taylor TD. , ed. Clinical Maxillofacial Prosthetics. Hanover Park, Illinois, IL: Quintessence Publishing; 2000: 1-14
  • 5 de Bree R, Leemans CR. Recent advances in surgery for head and neck cancer. Curr Opin Oncol 2010; 22 (03) 186-193
  • 6 Moreno MA, Skoracki RJ, Hanna EY, Hanasono MM. Microvascular free flap reconstruction versus palatal obturation for maxillectomy defects. Head Neck 2010; 32 (07) 860-868
  • 7 Markt JC, Lemon JC. Extraoral maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation at the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center: a survey of patient attitudes and opinions. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85 (06) 608-613
  • 8 Montgomery PC, Kiat-Amnuay S. Survey of currently used materials for fabrication of extraoral maxillofacial prostheses in North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia. J Prosthodont 2010; 19 (06) 482-490
  • 9 Federspil PA. Implant-retained craniofacial prostheses for facial defects. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009; 8: Doc03
  • 10 Feng Z, Dong Y, Zhao Y. , et al. Computer-assisted technique for the design and manufacture of realistic facial prostheses. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 48 (02) 105-109
  • 11 Subburaj K, Nair C, Rajesh S, Meshram SM, Ravi B. Rapid development of auricular prosthesis using CAD and rapid prototyping technologies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 36 (10) 938-943
  • 12 Gal TJ, Kerschner JE, Futran ND. , et al. Reconstruction after temporal bone resection. Laryngoscope 1998; 108 (4 Pt 1): 476-481
  • 13 Cheney ML, Varvares MA, Nadol Jr JB. The temporoparietal fascial flap in head and neck reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993; 119 (06) 618-623
  • 14 Iseli TA, Yelverton JC, Iseli CE, Carroll WR, Magnuson JS, Rosenthal EL. Functional outcomes following secondary free flap reconstruction of the head and neck. Laryngoscope 2009; 119 (05) 856-860
  • 15 Neligan PC, Mulholland S, Irish J. , et al. Flap selection in cranial base reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 98 (07) 1159-1166 , discussion; 1167–1168
  • 16 Giot JP, Labbé D, Soubeyrand E. , et al. Prosthetic reconstruction of the auricle: indications, techniques, and results. Semin Plast Surg 2011; 25 (04) 265-272
  • 17 Mardani MA, Aminian G, Tabatabaian F, Arazpour M, Hutchins SW, Head JS. A novel technique for fabricating an ear prosthesis in a patient with congenital ear deformity. Prosthet Orthot Int 2013; 37 (04) 340-343
  • 18 Badie-Modiri B, Kaplanski P. Extra-oral implants: principal areas of implantation [Article in French]. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 2001; 102 (05) 229-233
  • 19 Gliklich RE, Rounds MF, Cheney ML, Varvares MA. Combining free flap reconstruction and craniofacial prosthetic technique for orbit, scalp, and temporal defects. Laryngoscope 1998; 108 (4 Pt 1): 482-487
  • 20 Chambers MS, Lemon JC, Martin JW. Surgical techniques to enhance prosthetic rehabilitation. In: Bailey BJ, Johnson JT, Newlines S. , eds. Head and Neck Surgery-Otolaryngology. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2006: 1853-1865 , Chapter 127
  • 21 Lemon JC, Martin JW, Jacob RF. Prosthetic rehabilitation. In: Weber RS, Miller MJ, Goepfert H. , eds. Basal and Squamous Cell Skin Cancers of the Head and Neck. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1996: 305-312
  • 22 King GE, Jacob RF, Martin JW. Oral and dental rehabilitation. In: Johns ME. , ed. Complications in Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. Philadelphia, PA: BC Decker; 1986: 131
  • 23 Lemon JC, Chambers MS. Conventional methods of retention of facial prostheses. First International Congress on Max Fac Prosthetics 1994; 1: 116-119
  • 24 Cordeiro PG, Santamaria E. A classification system and algorithm for reconstruction of maxillectomy and midfacial defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (07) 2331-2346 ; discussion 2347–2348
  • 25 Wei FC, Jain V, Celik N, Chen HC, Chuang DC, Lin CH. Have we found an ideal soft-tissue flap? An experience with 672 anterolateral thigh flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109 (07) 2219-2226 ; discussion 2227–2230
  • 26 Ozkan O, Coşkunfirat OK, Ozgentaş HE. An ideal and versatile material for soft-tissue coverage: experiences with most modifications of the anterolateral thigh flap. J Reconstr Microsurg 2004; 20 (05) 377-383
  • 27 Coskunfirat OK, Wei FC, Huang WC, Cheng MH, Yang WG, Chang YM. Microvascular free tissue transfer for treatment of osteoradionecrosis of the maxilla. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115 (01) 54-60
  • 28 Ozkan O, Mardini S, Chen HC, Cigna E, Tang WR, Liu YT. Repair of buccal defects with anterolateral thigh flaps. Microsurgery 2006; 26 (03) 182-189
  • 29 Funk GF, Arcuri MR, Frodel Jr JL. Functional dental rehabilitation of massive palatomaxillary defects: cases requiring free tissue transfer and osseointegrated implants. Head Neck 1998; 20 (01) 38-51
  • 30 Hanasono MM, Hofstede TM. Craniofacial reconstruction following oncologic resection. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2013; 24 (01) 111-124
  • 31 Mueller S, Hohlweg-Majert B, Buergers R. , et al. The functional and aesthetic reconstruction of midfacial and orbital defects by combining free flap transfer and craniofacial prosthesis. Clin Oral Investig 2015; 19 (02) 413-419
  • 32 Vander Poorten V, Meulemans J, Delaere P. Midface prosthetic rehabilitation. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016; 24 (02) 98-109
  • 33 Streit L, Dražan L, Hýža P. , et al. Reconstruction of large facial and orbital defects by combining free flap transfer with craniofacial prosthesis. Acta Chir Plast 2016; 58 (02) 77-81
  • 34 Aramany MA. Basic principles of obturator design for partially edentulous patients. Part II: design principles. J Prosthet Dent 1978; 40 (06) 656-662
  • 35 Visser A, Raghoebar GM, van Oort RP, Vissink A. Fate of implant-retained craniofacial prostheses: life span and aftercare. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23 (01) 89-98
  • 36 Kiat-Amnuay S, Gettleman L, Goldsmith LJ. Effect of multi-adhesive layering on retention of extraoral maxillofacial silicone prostheses in vivo. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 92 (03) 294-298
  • 37 Wondergem M, Lieben G, Bouman S, van den Brekel MW, Lohuis PJ. Patients' satisfaction with facial prostheses. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 54 (04) 394-399
  • 38 Cobein MV, Coto NP, Crivello Junior O. , et al. Retention systems for extraoral maxillofacial prosthetic implants: a critical review. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017; . [Epub ahead of print] DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2017.04.012.
  • 39 Granström G. Craniofacial osseointegration. Oral Dis 2007; 13 (03) 261-269
  • 40 Albrektsson T. Dental and maxillofacial implantology. In: Hobkirk JA, Watson K. , eds. Principles of Osseointegration. London: Mosby–Wolfe; 1995: 9-19
  • 41 Wilson-Hench J. Osteoinduction. Definitions in biomaterials. In: Williams DF. , ed. Progress in Biomedical Engineering, Vol 4. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1987: 29
  • 42 Frost HM. The biology of fracture healing. An overview for clinicians. Part I. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; (248) 283-293
  • 43 Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindström J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981; 52 (02) 155-170
  • 44 Branemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R. , et al. Osseointegrated titanium implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1977; 16: 1-132
  • 45 Tjellström A, Håkansson B. The bone-anchored hearing aid. Design principles, indications, and long-term clinical results. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1995; 28 (01) 53-72
  • 46 Reyes RA, Tjellström A, Granström G. Evaluation of implant losses and skin reactions around extraoral bone-anchored implants: a 0- to 8-year follow-up. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 122 (02) 272-276
  • 47 Karakoca S, Aydin C, Yilmaz H, Bal BT. Retrospective study of treatment outcomes with implant-retained extraoral prostheses: survival rates and prosthetic complications. J Prosthet Dent 2010; 103 (02) 118-126
  • 48 Parel SM, Phillips WR. A risk assessment treatment planning protocol for the four implant immediately loaded maxilla: preliminary findings. J Prosthet Dent 2011; 106 (06) 359-366
  • 49 de Sousa AA, Mattos BS. ; Sousa de. Magnetic retention and bar-clip attachment for implant-retained auricular prostheses: a comparative analysis. Int J Prosthodont 2008; 21 (03) 233-236
  • 50 Voigt A, Christ S, Klein M. Experimental analysis of retention forces of different magnetic devices for bone-anchored auricular facial prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 37 (07) 664-668
  • 51 Ariani N, Visser A, van Oort RP. , et al. Current state of craniofacial prosthetic rehabilitation. Int J Prosthodont 2013; 26 (01) 57-67
  • 52 Granström G, Tjellström A, Brånemark PI. Osseointegrated implants in irradiated bone: a case-controlled study using adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen therapy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999; 57 (05) 493-499
  • 53 Cox A, Sabbagh W, Gault D. Costal cartilage or conchal cartilage for aesthetic and structural reconstruction of lower pole ear defects. Aesthet Surg J 2012; 32 (03) 271-274
  • 54 Mevio E, Facca L, Schettini S, Mullace M. Bone-anchored titanium implants in patients with auricular defects: three years and 27 patients' experience. Int J Otolaryngol 2016; 2016: 9872048
  • 55 Zhao Y, Wang Y, Zhuang H. , et al. Clinical evaluation of three total ear reconstruction methods. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62 (12) 1550-1554
  • 56 Lemon JC, Kiat-amnuay S, Gettleman L, Martin JW, Chambers MS. Facial prosthetic rehabilitation: preprosthetic surgical techniques and biomaterials. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005; 13 (04) 255-262
  • 57 Nishimura RD, Roumanas E, Sugai T, Moy PK. Auricular prostheses and osseointegrated implants: UCLA experience. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 73 (06) 553-558
  • 58 Wright RF, Zemnick C, Wazen JJ, Asher E. Osseointegrated implants and auricular defects: a case series study. J Prosthodont 2008; 17 (06) 468-475
  • 59 Badie-Modiri B, Kaplanski P. Extra-oral implants: principal areas of implantation [Article in French]. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 2001; 102 (05) 229-233
  • 60 Hughes MO. A pictorial anatomy of the human eye/anophthalmic socket: a review for ocularists. J Ophthalmic Prosthet 2007; 12: 51-63
  • 61 Begum Z, Kola MZ, Joshi P. Analysis of the properties of commercially available silicone elastomers for maxillofacial prostheses. Int J Contemp Dent 2011; 2 (04) 1-5
  • 62 Cafiero-Chin M, Marques C, Danz HJ. Ocular prosthesis: indications to management. Can J Optom 2015; 77: 24-32
  • 63 Baino F, Perero S, Ferraris S. , et al. Biomaterials for orbital implants and ocular prostheses: overview and future prospects. Acta Biomater 2014; 10 (03) 1064-1087
  • 64 Schellini S, El Dib R, Silva LR, Farat JG, Zhang Y, Jorge EC. Integrated versus non-integrated orbital implants for treating anophthalmic sockets. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 11: CD010293
  • 65 Da Costa GC, Aras MA, Chalakkal P, Da Costa MC. Ocular prosthesis incorporating IPS e-max press scleral veneer and a literature review on non-integrated ocular prosthesis. Int J Ophthalmol 2017; 10 (01) 148-156
  • 66 Moran WJ, Toljanic JA, Panje WR. Implant-retained prosthetic rehabilitation of orbital defects. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996; 122 (01) 46-50
  • 67 Raghoebar GM, van Oort RP, Roodenburg JL, Reintsema H, Dikkers FG. Fixation of auricular prostheses by osseointegrated implants. J Invest Surg 1994; 7 (04) 283-290
  • 68 Ciocca L, Maremonti P, Bianchi B, Scotti R. Maxillofacial rehabilitation after rhinectomy using two different treatment options: clinical reports. J Oral Rehabil 2007; 34 (04) 311-315
  • 69 Seçilmiş A, Oztürk AN. Nasal prosthesis rehabilitation after partial rhinectomy: a clinical report. Eur J Dent 2007; 1 (02) 115-118
  • 70 Dimitroulis G. Nasal implants following nasectomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 36 (05) 447-449
  • 71 Scott N, Kittur MA, Evans PL, Dovgalski L, Hodder SC. The use of zygomatic implants for the retention of nasal prosthesis following rhinectomy: the Morriston experience. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 45 (08) 1044-1048
  • 72 Brånemark PI, Adell R, Albrektsson T, Lekholm U, Lindström J, Rockler B. An experimental and clinical study of osseointegrated implants penetrating the nasal cavity and maxillary sinus. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1984; 42 (08) 497-505
  • 73 Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Survival and complications of zygomatic implants: an updated systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 74 (10) 1949-1964
  • 74 Malard O, Lanhouet J, Michel G, Dreno B, Espitalier F, Rio E. Full-thickness nasal defect: place of prosthetic reconstruction. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2015; 132 (02) 85-89
  • 75 Flood TR, Russell K. Reconstruction of nasal defects with implant-retained nasal prostheses. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998; 36 (05) 341-345
  • 76 Ethunandan M, Downie I, Flood T. Implant-retained nasal prosthesis for reconstruction of large rhinectomy defects: the Salisbury experience. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 39 (04) 343-349
  • 77 Okay DJ, Genden E, Buchbinder D, Urken M. Prosthodontic guidelines for surgical reconstruction of the maxilla: a classification system of defects. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 86 (04) 352-363
  • 78 Beumer J, Curtis TA, Marunick MT. , eds. Maxillofacial Rehabilitation: Prosthodontic and Surgical Consideration. 2nd ed. St. Louis, Missouri, MO: Ishiyaku Euroamerica Inc; 1996
  • 79 Wolfaardt J, Gehl G, Farmand M, Wilkes G. Indications and methods of care for aspects of extraoral osseointegration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; 32 (02) 124-131
  • 80 Murat S, Gurbuz A, Isayev A, Dokmez B, Cetin U. Enhanced retention of a maxillofacial prosthetic obturator using precision attachments: two case reports. Eur J Dent 2012; 6 (02) 212-217
  • 81 Parr GR, Tharp GE, Rahn AO. Prosthodontic principles in the framework design of maxillary obturator prostheses. 1989. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 93 (05) 405-411
  • 82 Özkan O, Coşkunfirat OK, Özkan O. Midface reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg 2010; 24 (02) 181-187