Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1606560
Vascular Grafts and Flow-through Flaps for Microsurgical Lower Extremity Reconstruction
Publication History
14 July 2017
01 August 2017
Publication Date:
06 October 2017 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/jrm/2017S01/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055-s-0037-1606560_170180-1.jpg)
Abstract
Background The use of vascular grafts is indicated in case of insufficient pedicle length or for complex defects involving both soft tissues and vessels. Venous grafts (for both venous and arterial reconstructions) and arterial grafts (arterial reconstruction) can be used. This study retrospectively evaluated the needs for vascular reconstruction and its results in a clinical series of lower limb reconstructions with microsurgical free flaps.
Materials and Methods From 2010 to 2015, a total of 16 vascular grafts or flow-through flaps were used in 12 patients out of a total of 150 patients undergoing microsurgical reconstruction (8%). Arterial reconstruction was performed in seven cases (six flow-through flaps, one arterial graft), combined arterial and venous reconstruction in four cases (three vein grafts, one combined venous/arterial graft), and venous reconstruction in one case (one venous graft). The rate of complications and donor-site morbidity related to vascular graft harvest were evaluated.
Results Reconstruction was successful in all cases, despite an overall complication rate of 17 and 8% of surgical revision. Donor-site morbidity, subjectively evaluated, was minimal with respect to functional deficits and aesthetic outcome. Indications for the different types of grafts are discussed.
Conclusion The use of vascular grafts is needed in a relevant percentage of microsurgical reconstruction cases. Venous and arterial vascular grafts, transient arteriovenous fistulas, and “flow-through” microsurgical flaps showed a safe reconstruction comparable to microsurgical reconstructions without the use of grafts. Donor-site morbidity secondary to vascular graft harvest is minimal, and in almost 70% of cases no additional scars are needed.
-
References
- 1 Uhl C, Grosch C, Hock C, Töpel I, Steinbauer M. Comparison of long-term outcomes of heparin bonded polytetrafluoroethylene and autologous vein below knee femoropopliteal bypasses in patients with critical limb ischaemia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2017; 54 (02) 203-211
- 2 Nelson JA, Fischer JP, Grover R. , et al. Vein grafting your way out of trouble: Examining the utility and efficacy of vein grafts in microsurgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68 (06) 830-836
- 3 Zenn MR, Pribaz J, Walsh M. Use of the descending lateral femoral circumflex artery and vein for vascular grafting: a better alternative to an arteriovenous loop. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (01) 140-142
- 4 Qing L, Wu P, Liang J, Yu F, Wang C, Tang J. Use of flow-through Anterolateral Thigh Perforator flaps in reconstruction of complex extremity defects. J Reconstr Microsurg 2015; 31 (08) 571-578
- 5 Cavadas PC. Arteriovenous vascular loops in free flap reconstruction of the extremities. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (02) 514-520
- 6 Bayramiçli M, Tetik C, Sönmez A, Gürünlüoğlu R, Baltaci F. Reliability of primary vein grafts in lower extremity free tissue transfers. Ann Plast Surg 2002; 48 (01) 21-29
- 7 Furr MC, Cannady S, Wax MK. Interposition vein grafts in microvascular head and neck reconstruction. Laryngoscope 2011; 121 (04) 707-711
- 8 Crowell RM, Yasargil MG. Experimental microvascular autografting. Technical note. J Neurosurg 1969; 31 (01) 101-104
- 9 Collins P, Webb CM, Chong CF, Moat NE. ; Radial Artery Versus Saphenous Vein Patency (RSVP) Trial Investigators. Radial artery versus saphenous vein patency randomized trial: five-year angiographic follow-up. Circulation 2008; 117 (22) 2859-2864
- 10 Webb CM, Moat NE, Chong CF, Collins P. Vascular reactivity and flow characteristics of radial artery and long saphenous vein coronary bypass grafts: a 5-year follow-up. Circulation 2010; 122 (09) 861-867
- 11 Godina M. Arterial autografts in microvascular surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986; 78 (03) 293-294
- 12 Masden DL, Seruya M, Higgins JP. A systematic review of the outcomes of distal upper extremity bypass surgery with arterial and venous conduits. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37 (11) 2362-2367
- 13 Masden DL, McClinton MA. Arterial conduits for distal upper extremity bypass. J Hand Surg Am 2013; 38 (03) 572-577
- 14 Desai ND, Naylor CD, Kiss A. , et al; Radial Artery Patency Study Investigators. Impact of patient and target-vessel characteristics on arterial and venous bypass graft patency: insight from a randomized trial. Circulation 2007; 115 (06) 684-691
- 15 Slevin M, Bontas E. Arterial graft failure. In: Coronary Graft Failure. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2016: 235-265
- 16 Hata M, Yoshitake I, Wakui S. , et al. Long-term patency rate for radial artery vs. saphenous vein grafts using same-patient materials. Circ J 2011; 75 (06) 1373-1377
- 17 Goldman S, Sethi GK, Holman W. , et al. Radial artery grafts vs saphenous vein grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized trial. JAMA 2011; 305 (02) 167-174
- 18 Hayward PA, Hare DL, Gordon I, Buxton BF. Effect of radial artery or saphenous vein conduit for the second graft on 6-year clinical outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting. Results of a randomised trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008; 34 (01) 113-117
- 19 McClinton MA. Reconstruction for ulnar artery aneurysm at the wrist. J Hand Surg Am 2011; 36 (02) 328-332
- 20 Smith HE, Dirks M, Patterson RB. Hypothenar hammer syndrome: Distal ulnar artery reconstruction with autologous inferior epigastric artery. J Vasc Surg 2004; 40 (06) 1238-1242
- 21 Valnicek SM, Mosher M, Hopkins JK, Rockwell WB. The subscapular arterial tree as a source of microvascular arterial grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113 (07) 2001-2005
- 22 Rockwell WB, Smith SM, Tolliston T, Valnicek SM. Arterial conduits for extremity microvascular bypass surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 112 (03) 829-834
- 23 Munarriz R, Uberoi J, Fantini G, Martinez D, Lee C. Microvascular arterial bypass surgery: long-term outcomes using validated instruments. J Urol 2009; 182 (02) 643-648
- 24 Harris JR, Seikaly H, Calhoun K, Daugherty E. Effect of diameter of microvascular interposition vein grafts on vessel patency and free flap survival in the rat model. J Otolaryngol 1999; 28 (03) 152-157
- 25 Zhang F, Ho PR, Chin BT, Ozek C, Buncke HJ, Lineaweaver WC. Effect of vein grafting on the survival of microvascularly transplanted muscle flaps. Microsurgery 1996; 17 (09) 512-516
- 26 He GW. Arterial grafts: clinical classification and pharmacological management. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2013; 2 (04) 507-518
- 27 Lin CH, Mardini S, Lin YT, Yeh JT, Wei FC, Chen HC. Sixty-five clinical cases of free tissue transfer using long arteriovenous fistulas or vein grafts. J Trauma 2004; 56 (05) 1107-1117
- 28 Murphy GJ, White SA, Knight AJ, Doughman T, Nicholson ML. Long-term results of arteriovenous fistulas using transposed autologous basilic vein. Br J Surg 2000; 87 (06) 819-823