Semin Plast Surg 2017; 31(04): 222-226
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1606557
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Calvarial Reconstruction

Arvind Badhey
1   Department of Otolaryngology, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai, New York
,
Sameep Kadakia
2   Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery Associates, Fort Worth, Texas
,
Moustafa Mourad
2   Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery Associates, Fort Worth, Texas
,
Jared Inman
3   Department of Otolaryngology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California
,
Yadranko Ducic
2   Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery Associates, Fort Worth, Texas
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
25 October 2017 (online)

Abstract

Calvarial reconstruction is a challenge to reconstructive surgeons, especially considering protection of intracranial contents. In recent years, the advent of multiple reconstructive materials adds tools to the surgical armamentarium. Options include autologous split calvarial and rib grafts and alloplastic materials such as titanium mesh, methyl methacrylate, calcium hydroxyapatite, and polyetheretherketone. The most important aspect of cranial reconstruction still lies in finding the most aesthetic, safe, and reliable means of filling a defect.

 
  • References

  • 1 Ioannides C, Fossion E, McGrouther AD. Reconstruction for large defects of the scalp and cranium. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1999; 27 (03) 145-152
  • 2 Warren SM, Fong KD, Chen CM. , et al. Tools and techniques for craniofacial tissue engineering. Tissue Eng 2003; 9 (02) 187-200
  • 3 Habal MB, Pietrzak WS. Key points in the fixation of the craniofacial skeleton with absorbable biomaterial. J Craniofac Surg 1999; 10 (06) 491-499
  • 4 Ono I, Tateshita T, Satou M, Sasaki T, Matsumoto M, Kodama N. Treatment of large complex cranial bone defects by using hydroxyapatite ceramic implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104 (02) 339-349
  • 5 Eppley BL, Kilgo M, Coleman III JJ. Cranial reconstruction with computer-generated hard-tissue replacement patient-matched implants: indications, surgical technique, and long-term follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109 (03) 864-871
  • 6 D'Urso PS, Earwaker WJ, Barker TM. , et al. Custom cranioplasty using stereolithography and acrylic. Br J Plast Surg 2000; 53 (03) 200-204
  • 7 Wiggins A, Austerberry R, Morrison D, Ho KM, Honeybul S. Cranioplasty with custom-made titanium plates—14 years experience. Neurosurgery 2013; 72 (02) 248-256 , discussion 256
  • 8 Harris DA, Fong AJ, Buchanan EP, Monson L, Khechoyan D, Lam S. History of synthetic materials in alloplastic cranioplasty. Neurosurg Focus 2014; 36 (04) E20
  • 9 Aydin S, Kucukyuruk B, Abuzayed B, Aydin S, Sanus GZ. Cranioplasty: review of materials and techniques. J Neurosci Rural Pract 2011; 2 (02) 162-167
  • 10 Thomaidis V. Cutaneous Flaps in Head and Neck Reconstruction. Anatomy to Surgery. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; 2014
  • 11 Tolhurst DE, Carstens MH, Greco RJ, Hurwitz DJ. The surgical anatomy of the scalp. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991; 87 (04) 603-612 , discussion 613–614
  • 12 Hoffman JF. Management of scalp defects. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2001; 34 (03) 571-582
  • 13 Lin SJ, Hanasono MM, Skoracki RJ. Scalp and calvarial reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg 2008; 22 (04) 281-293
  • 14 Song J, Liu M, Mo X, Du H, Huang H, Xu GZ. Beneficial impact of early cranioplasty in patients with decompressive craniectomy: evidence from transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2014; 156 (01) 193-198
  • 15 Honeybul S, Janzen C, Kruger K, Ho KM. The impact of cranioplasty on neurological function. Br J Neurosurg 2013; 27 (05) 636-641
  • 16 Grant FC, Norcross NC. Repair of cranial defects by cranioplasty. Ann Surg 1939; 110 (04) 488-512
  • 17 Chim H, Schantz JT. New frontiers in calvarial reconstruction: integrating computer-assisted design and tissue engineering in cranioplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116 (06) 1726-1741
  • 18 Courville CB. Cranioplasty in prehistoric times. Bull Los Angel Neuro Soc 1959; 24 (01) 1-8
  • 19 Ellis W. Polynesian Researches. Vol. III. London: Fisher, Son & Jackson; 1836: 34
  • 20 Koksal V, Kayaci S, Bedir R. Split rib cranioplasty for frontal osteoma: a case report and review of the literature. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2016; 18 (07) e29541
  • 21 Zanotti B, Zingaretti N, Verlicchi A, Robiony M, Alfieri A, Parodi PC. Cranioplasty: review of materials. J Craniofac Surg 2016; 27 (08) 2061-2072
  • 22 Mueller W. Zur frage der temporaren schadelresektion an stelle der trepanation. Zentralbl Chir 1890; 17: 65
  • 23 Backdahl EO, Eriksson GX. . Paper presented at: Meeting della Società Scandinava di Chirurgia Plastica. Stockholm, Sweden: 1966
  • 24 Artico M, Ferrante L, Pastore FS. , et al. Bone autografting of the calvaria and craniofacial skeleton: historical background, surgical results in a series of 15 patients, and review of the literature. Surg Neurol 2003; 60 (01) 71-79
  • 25 Açikgöz B, Özcan OE, Erbengi A, Bertan V, Ruacan S, Açikgöz HG. Histopathologic and microdensitometric analysis of craniotomy bone flaps preserved between abdominal fat and muscle. Surg Neurol 1986; 26 (06) 557-561
  • 26 Hadad I, Meara JG, Rogers-Vizena CR. A novel local autologous bone graft donor site after scalp tissue expansion in aplasia cutis congenita. J Craniofac Surg 2016; 27 (04) 904-907
  • 27 Greene AK, Mulliken JB, Proctor MR, Rogers GF. Pediatric cranioplasty using particulate calvarial bone graft. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (02) 563-571
  • 28 Haeseker B. Van Meekeren and his account of the transplant of bone from a dog into the skull of a soldier. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991; 88 (01) 173-174
  • 29 Durand JL, Renier D, Marchac D. [The history of cranioplasty]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 1997; 42 (01) 75-83
  • 30 Woolf JI, Walker AE. Cranioplasty: collective review. Int Abstr Surg 1945; 81: 1-23
  • 31 Goldstein JA, Paliga JT, Bartlett SP. Cranioplasty: indications and advances. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 21 (04) 400-409
  • 32 Matsuno A, Tanaka H, Iwamuro H. , et al. Analyses of the factors influencing bone graft infection after delayed cranioplasty. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2006; 148 (05) 535-540 , discussion 540
  • 33 Shah AM, Jung H, Skirboll S. Materials used in cranioplasty: a history and analysis. Neurosurg Focus 2014; 36 (04) E19
  • 34 Marbacher S, Andres RH, Fathi AR, Fandino J. Primary reconstruction of open depressed skull fractures with titanium mesh. J Craniofac Surg 2008; 19 (02) 490-495
  • 35 Eufinger H, Wehmoller M, Wethe S, Machtens E. Individual prefabricated titanium implants for cranioplasty. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999; 28: 172
  • 36 Winder J, Cooke RS, Gray J, Fannin T, Fegan T. Medical rapid prototyping and 3D CT in the manufacture of custom made cranial titanium plates. J Med Eng Technol 1999; 23 (01) 26-28
  • 37 Cabraja M, Klein M, Lehmann TN. Long-term results following titanium cranioplasty of large skull defects. Neurosurg Focus 2009; 26 (06) E10
  • 38 Singh M, Ricci JA, Dunn IF, Caterson EJ. Alloderm covering over titanium cranioplasty may minimize contour deformities in the frontal bone position. J Craniofac Surg 2016; 27 (05) 1292-1294
  • 39 Marchac D, Greensmith A. Long-term experience with methylmethacrylate cranioplasty in craniofacial surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008; 61 (07) 744-752 , discussion 753
  • 40 Henry HM, Guerrero C, Moody RA. Cerebrospinal fluid fistula from fractured acrylic cranioplasty plate. Case report. J Neurosurg 1976; 45 (02) 227-228
  • 41 Galicich JH, Hovind KH. Stainless steel mesh-acrylic cranioplasty. Technical note. J Neurosurg 1967; 27 (04) 376-378
  • 42 Chiarini L, Figurelli S, Pollastri G. , et al. Cranioplasty using acrylic material: a new technical procedure. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2004; 32 (01) 5-9
  • 43 Rubin JP, Yaremchuk MJ. Complications and toxicities of implantable biomaterials used in facial reconstructive and aesthetic surgery: a comprehensive review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 100 (05) 1336-1353
  • 44 Blum KS, Schneider SJ, Rosenthal AD. Methyl methacrylate cranioplasty in children: long-term results. Pediatr Neurosurg 1997; 26 (01) 33-35
  • 45 Turgut G, Özkaya Ö, Kayali MU. Computer-aided design and manufacture and rapid prototyped polymethylmethacrylate reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg 2012; 23 (03) 770-773
  • 46 Sanan A, Haines SJ. Repairing holes in the head: a history of cranioplasty. Neurosurgery 1997; 40 (03) 588-603
  • 47 Verret DJ, Ducic Y, Oxford L, Smith J. Hydroxyapatite cement in craniofacial reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005; 133 (06) 897-899
  • 48 Frassanito P, De Bonis P, Mattogno PP. , et al. The fate of a macroporous hydroxyapatite cranioplasty four years after implantation: macroscopical and microscopical findings in a case of recurrent atypical meningioma. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2013; 115 (08) 1496-1498
  • 49 Miyake H, Ohta T, Tanaka H. A new technique for cranioplasty with L-shaped titanium plates and combination ceramic implants composed of hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate (Ceratite). Neurosurgery 2000; 46 (02) 414-418
  • 50 Gilardino MS, Cabiling DS, Bartlett SP. Long-term follow-up experience with carbonated calcium phosphate cement (Norian) for cranioplasty in children and adults. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123 (03) 983-994
  • 51 Lethaus B, Safi Y, ter Laak-Poort M. , et al. Cranioplasty with customized titanium and PEEK implants in a mechanical stress model. J Neurotrauma 2012; 29 (06) 1077-1083
  • 52 Wang JC, Wei L, Xu J, Liu JF, Gui L. Clinical outcome of cranioplasty with high-density porous polyethylene. J Craniofac Surg 2012; 23 (05) 1404-1406
  • 53 Cooke MN, Fisher JP, Dean D, Rimnac C, Mikos AG. Use of stereolithography to manufacture critical-sized 3D biodegradable scaffolds for bone ingrowth. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2003; 64 (02) 65-69
  • 54 Dean D, Min KJ, Bond A. Computer aided design of large-format prefabricated cranial plates. J Craniofac Surg 2003; 14 (06) 819-832