Agreement between Perometry and Sequential Arm Circumference Measurements in Objective Determination of Arm Volume

Abstract

Background Limb circumference measurements (CM) and perometry are the preferred methods for objectively measuring arm volume in lymphedema surgery research. Understanding the measurement bias involved in these measuring systems is important to properly interpret and compare studies and their results.

Methods Arm volumes from 91 patients were measured using sequential girths and the truncated cone formula (CM) and with the use of an automated perometer (perometry). The absolute volume of the largest arm (V), the volume difference between the arms (VD), and the relative difference between them (percentage of excess volume [PEV]) were calculated with both methods. The agreement between methods was assessed by the Pearson's correlation test and the Bland–Altman's method.

Results Correlations were strong for V (r = 0.99), VD (r = 88), and PEV (r = 0.86). Volumes measured by perometry were, on average, 10.6 mL smaller than volumes calculated from CM, while their limits of agreement (LOA) ranged from −202 to 181 mL. The LOA represents the range we could expect the arm volumes measured with the two methods to differ by chance alone, 95% of the times. For VD, LOA was −101 to 141 mL, with a mean difference of 19.9 mL, while PEV had a mean difference of 0.9%, with LOA ranging from −5 to 6.8%.

Conclusion There is considerable measurement error between arm volume estimated by perometry and by CM. Volumes calculated with these methods should be compared with caution. Furthermore, we observed an increasingly relevant measurement bias in outcomes that are mathematically derived from arm volumes.

Keywords

lymphedema - outcome - measurement error

• References

• 1 Becker C, Vasile JV, Levine JL. , et al. Microlymphatic surgery for the treatment of iatrogenic lymphedema. Clin Plast Surg 2012; 39 (04) 385-398
• 2 Becker C, Arrive L, Saaristo A. , et al. Surgical treatment of congenital lymphedema. Clin Plast Surg 2012; 39 (04) 377-384
• 3 Koshima I, Inagawa K, Urushibara K, Moriguchi T. Supermicrosurgical lymphaticovenular anastomosis for the treatment of lymphedema in the upper extremities. J Reconstr Microsurg 2000; 16 (06) 437-442
• 4 Brorson H, Svensson H. Liposuction combined with controlled compression therapy reduces arm lymphedema more effectively than controlled compression therapy alone. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (04) 1058-1067 , discussion 1068
• 5 Masia J, Pons G, Nardulli ML. Combined surgical treatment in breast cancer-related lymphedema. J Reconstr Microsurg 2016; 32 (01) 16-27
• 6 Basta MN, Gao LL, Wu LC. Operative treatment of peripheral lymphedema: a systematic meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of lymphovenous microsurgery and tissue transplantation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133 (04) 905-913
• 7 Batista BN, Germain M, Faria JC, Becker C. Lymph node flap transfer for patients with secondary lower limb lymphedema. Microsurgery 2017; 37 (01) 29-33
• 8 Granzow JW, Soderberg JM, Kaji AH, Dauphine C. An effective system of surgical treatment of lymphedema. Ann Surg Oncol 2014; 21 (04) 1189-1194
• 9 Dionyssiou D, Demiri E, Tsimponis A. , et al. A randomized control study of treating secondary stage II breast cancer-related lymphoedema with free lymph node transfer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2016; 156 (01) 73-79
• 10 Chang DW, Suami H, Skoracki R. A prospective analysis of 100 consecutive lymphovenous bypass cases for treatment of extremity lymphedema. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (05) 1305-1314
• 11 Part II. Concepts of measurement. In: Portney LG, Watkins MP. , eds. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice, 3rd ed. Old Tappan, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2015
• 12 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1 (8476): 307-310
• 13 Karges JR, Mark BE, Stikeleather SJ, Worrell TW. Concurrent validity of upper-extremity volume estimates: comparison of calculated volume derived from girth measurements and water displacement volume. Phys Ther 2003; 83 (02) 134-145
• 14 Brorson H, Höijer P. Standardised measurements used to order compression garments can be used to calculate arm volumes to evaluate lymphoedema treatment. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2012; 46 (06) 410-415
• 15 Bland JM, Altman DG. Measurement error proportional to the mean. BMJ 1996; 313 (7049): 106
• 16 Bland JM, Altman DG. Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22 (01) 85-93