CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2018; 22(04): 460-468
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1605598
Systematic Review
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Parameters for Applying the Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potential with Speech Stimulus: Systematic Review

Luísa Bello Gabriel
1   Phonoaudiology, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
,
Luíza Silva Vernier
2   Speech Therapy, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
,
Maria Inês Dornelles da Costa Ferreira
1   Phonoaudiology, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
,
Adriana Laybauer Silveira
3   Phonoaudiology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
,
Márcia Salgado Machado
1   Phonoaudiology, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

09 February 2017

29 June 2017

Publication Date:
28 August 2017 (online)

Abstract

Introduction Studies using the Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potential with speech stimulus are increasing in Brazil, and there are divergences between the methodologies used for testing.

Objectives To analyze the parameters used in the study of the Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potentials with speech stimulus.

Data Synthesis The survey was performed using electronic databases. The search strategy was as follows: “Evoked potentials, auditory” OR “Brain stem” OR “Evoked potentials, auditory, brain stem” AND “Speech.” The survey was performed from June to July of 2016. The criteria used for including articles in this study were: being written in Portuguese, English or Spanish; presenting the description of the testing parameters and the description of the sample. In the databases selected, 2,384 articles were found, and 43 articles met all of the inclusion criteria. The predominance of the following parameters was observed to achieve the potential during study: stimulation with the syllable /da/; monaural presentation with greater use of the right ear; intensity of 80 dB SPL; vertical placement of electrodes; use of in-ear headphones; patient seated, distracted in awake state; alternating polarity; use of speech synthesizer software for the elaboration of stimuli; presentation rate of 10.9/s; and sampling rate of 20 kHz.

Conclusions The theme addressed in this systematic review is relatively recent. However, the results are significant enough to encourage the use of the procedure in clinical practice and advise clinicians about the most used procedures in each parameter.

 
  • References

  • 1 Russo N, Nicol T, Musacchia G, Kraus N. Brainstem responses to speech syllables. Clin Neurophysiol 2004; 115 (09) 2021-2030
  • 2 Filippini R. Eficácia do treinamento auditivo por meio do potencial evocado para sons complexos nos transtornos de audição e linguagem [dissertation]. São Paulo: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo; 2011
  • 3 Rocha CN, Filippini R, Moreira RR, Neves IF, Schochat E. Brainstem auditory evoked potential with speech stimulus. Pro Fono 2010; 22 (04) 479-484
  • 4 Kraus N, Nicol T. Aggregate neural responses to speech sounds in the central auditory system. Speech Commun 2003; 41 (01) 35-47
  • 5 Johnson KL, Nicol T, Kraus N. Brain stem response to speech: a biological marker of auditory processing. Ear Hear 2005; 26 (05) 424-434
  • 6 Sanfins MD, Borges LR, Ubiali T, Colella-Santos MF. Speech auditory brainstem response (speech ABR) in the differential diagnosis of scholastic difficulties. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol (Engl Ed) 2017; 83 (01) 112-116
  • 7 Binder JR, Frost JA, Hammeke TA. , et al. Human temporal lobe activation by speech and nonspeech sounds. Cereb Cortex 2000; 10 (05) 512-528
  • 8 Abrams D, Kraus N. Auditory pathway representation of speech sounds in humans. In: Katz J, Hood L, Burkard R, Medwetsky L. , ed. Handbook of Clinical Audiology. 6th ed. Alphen aan den Rijn; Netherlands Wolters Kluwer; 2009: 611-626
  • 9 Gonçalves IC. Potencial evocado auditivo de tronco encefálico com estímulo de fala em crianças com distúrbio fonológico [dissertation]. São Paulo Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo; 2009
  • 10 Filippini R, Schochat E. Potenciais evocados auditivos de tronco encefálico com estímulo de fala no transtorno do processamento auditivo. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol (Engl Ed) 2009; 75 (03) 449-455
  • 11 Hayes EA, Warrier CM, Nicol TG, Zecker SG, Kraus N. Neural plasticity following auditory training in children with learning problems. Clin Neurophysiol 2003; 114 (04) 673-684
  • 12 Wible B, Nicol T, Kraus N. Atypical brainstem representation of onset and formant structure of speech sounds in children with language-based learning problems. Biol Psychol 2004; 67 (03) 299-317
  • 13 Papavramidis TS, Pliakos I, Michalopoulos N. , et al. Classic clamp-and-tie total thyroidectomy for large goiters in the modern era: To drain or not to drain. World J Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 4 (01) 1-5
  • 14 Kouni SN, Papadeas ES, Varakis IN, Kouvelas HD, Koutsojannis CM. Auditory brainstem responses in dyslexia: comparison between acoustic click and verbal stimulus events. J Otolaryngol 2006; 35 (05) 305-309
  • 15 Song JH, Banai K, Russo NM, Kraus N. On the relationship between speech- and nonspeech-evoked auditory brainstem responses. Audiol Neurootol 2006; 11 (04) 233-241
  • 16 Johnson KL, Nicol TG, Zecker SG, Kraus N. Auditory brainstem correlates of perceptual timing deficits. J Cogn Neurosci 2007; 19 (03) 376-385
  • 17 Johnson KL, Nicol T, Zecker SG, Bradlow AR, Skoe E, Kraus N. Brainstem encoding of voiced consonant–vowel stop syllables. Clin Neurophysiol 2008; 119 (11) 2623-2635
  • 18 Song JH, Banai K, Kraus N. Brainstem timing deficits in children with learning impairment may result from corticofugal origins. Audiol Neurootol 2008; 13 (05) 335-344
  • 19 Russo NM, Skoe E, Trommer B. , et al. Deficient brainstem encoding of pitch in children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Clin Neurophysiol 2008; 119 (08) 1720-1731
  • 20 Johnson KL, Nicol T, Zecker SG, Kraus N. Developmental plasticity in the human auditory brainstem. J Neurosci 2008; 28 (15) 4000-4007
  • 21 Russo N, Nicol T, Trommer B, Zecker S, Kraus N. Brainstem transcription of speech is disrupted in children with autism spectrum disorders. Dev Sci 2009; 12 (04) 557-567
  • 22 Dhar S, Abel R, Hornickel J. , et al. Exploring the relationship between physiological measures of cochlear and brainstem function. Clin Neurophysiol 2009; 120 (05) 959-966
  • 23 Hornickel J, Skoe E, Kraus N. Subcortical laterality of speech encoding. Audiol Neurootol 2009; 14 (03) 198-207
  • 24 Skoe E, Kraus N. Auditory brain stem response to complex sounds: a tutorial. Ear Hear 2010; 31 (03) 302-324
  • 25 Wang JQ, Nicol T, Skoe E, Sams M, Kraus N. Emotion and the auditory brainstem response to speech. Neurosci Lett 2010; 469 (03) 319-323
  • 26 Krizman JL, Skoe E, Kraus N. Stimulus rate and subcortical auditory processing of speech. Audiol Neurootol 2010; 15 (05) 332-342
  • 27 Anderson S, Parbery-Clark A, Yi H-G, Kraus N. A neural basis of speech-in-noise perception in older adults. Ear Hear 2011; 32 (06) 750-757
  • 28 Vander Werff KR, Burns KS. Brain stem responses to speech in younger and older adults. Ear Hear 2011; 32 (02) 168-180
  • 29 Rana B, Barman A. Correlation between speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. J Laryngol Otol 2011; 125 (09) 911-916
  • 30 Skoe E, Nicol T, Kraus N. Cross-phaseogram: objective neural index of speech sound differentiation. J Neurosci Methods 2011; 196 (02) 308-317
  • 31 Tierney A, Parbery-Clark A, Skoe E, Kraus N. Frequency-dependent effects of background noise on subcortical response timing. Hear Res 2011; 282 (1-2): 145-150
  • 32 Parbery-Clark A, Anderson S, Hittner E, Kraus N. Musical experience offsets age-related delays in neural timing. Neurobiol Aging 2012; 33 (07) 1483.e1-1483.e4
  • 33 Song JH, Skoe E, Banai K, Kraus N. Perception of speech in noise: neural correlates. J Cogn Neurosci 2011; 23 (09) 2268-2279
  • 34 Strait DL, Hornickel J, Kraus N. Subcortical processing of speech regularities underlies reading and music aptitude in children. Behav Brain Funct 2011; 7: 44
  • 35 Song JH, Nicol T, Kraus N. Test-retest reliability of the speech-evoked auditory brainstem response. Clin Neurophysiol 2011; 122 (02) 346-355
  • 36 Anderson S, Parbery-Clark A, White-Schwoch T, Kraus N. Aging affects neural precision of speech encoding. J Neurosci 2012; 32 (41) 14156-14164
  • 37 Krizman J, Skoe E, Kraus N. Sex differences in auditory subcortical function. Clin Neurophysiol 2012; 123 (03) 590-597
  • 38 Hornickel J, Anderson S, Skoe E, Yi H-G, Kraus N. Subcortical representation of speech fine structure relates to reading ability. Neuroreport 2012; 23 (01) 6-9
  • 39 Hornickel J, Knowles E, Kraus N. Test-retest consistency of speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses in typically-developing children. Hear Res 2012; 284 (1-2): 52-58
  • 40 Song JH, Skoe E, Banai K, Kraus N. Training to improve hearing speech in noise: biological mechanisms. Cereb Cortex 2012; 22 (05) 1180-1190
  • 41 Gonçalves IC. Aspectos audiológicos da gagueira: evidências comportamentais e eletrofisiológicas. [tese]. São Paulo Faculdade de Medicina: Universidade de São Paulo; 2013
  • 42 Laroche M, Dajani HR, Prévost F, Marcoux AM. Brainstem auditory responses to resolved and unresolved harmonics of a synthetic vowel in quiet and noise. Ear Hear 2013; 34 (01) 63-74
  • 43 Anderson S, Parbery-Clark A, White-Schwoch T, Drehobl S, Kraus N. Effects of hearing loss on the subcortical representation of speech cues. J Acoust Soc Am 2013; 133 (05) 3030-3038
  • 44 Hornickel J, Lin D, Kraus N. Speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses reflect familial and cognitive influences. Dev Sci 2013; 16 (01) 101-110
  • 45 Hornickel J, Kraus N. Unstable representation of sound: a biological marker of dyslexia. J Neurosci 2013; 33 (08) 3500-3504
  • 46 Fujihira H, Shiraishi K. Correlations between word intelligibility under reverberation and speech auditory brainstem responses in elderly listeners. Clin Neurophysiol 2015; 126 (01) 96-102
  • 47 Ahadi M, Pourbakht A, Jafari AH, Jalaie S. Effects of stimulus presentation mode and subcortical laterality in speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses. Int J Audiol 2014; 53 (04) 243-249
  • 48 Ahadi M, Pourbakht A, Jafari AH, Shirjian Z, Jafarpisheh AS. Gender disparity in subcortical encoding of binaurally presented speech stimuli: an auditory evoked potentials study. Auris Nasus Larynx 2014; 41 (03) 239-243
  • 49 Strait DL, O'Connell S, Parbery-Clark A, Kraus N. Musicians' enhanced neural differentiation of speech sounds arises early in life: developmental evidence from ages 3 to 30. Cereb Cortex 2014; 24 (09) 2512-2521
  • 50 Jafari Z, Malayeri S, Rostami R. Subcortical encoding of speech cues in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Clin Neurophysiol 2015; 126 (02) 325-332
  • 51 Bellier L, Veuillet E, Vesson JF, Bouchet P, Caclin A, Thai-Van H. Speech Auditory Brainstem Response through hearing aid stimulation. Hear Res 2015; 325: 49-54
  • 52 Skoe E, Krizman J, Anderson S, Kraus N. Stability and plasticity of auditory brainstem function across the lifespan. Cereb Cortex 2015; 25 (06) 1415-1426
  • 53 Akhoun I, Moulin A, Jeanvoine A. , et al. Speech auditory brainstem response (speech ABR) characteristics depending on recording conditions, and hearing status: an experimental parametric study. J Neurosci Methods 2008; 175 (02) 196-205
  • 54 Akhoun I, Gallégo S, Moulin A. , et al. The temporal relationship between speech auditory brainstem responses and the acoustic pattern of the phoneme /ba/ in normal-hearing adults. Clin Neurophysiol 2008; 119 (04) 922-933
  • 55 Klatt D. Software for cascade/parallel formant synthesizer. J Acoust Soc Am 1976; 67 (03) 971-975