PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Arquivos Brasileiros de Neurocirurgia: Brazilian Neurosurgery 2017; 36(02): 108-116
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1603808
Review Article | Artigo de Revisão
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Revisiting Retrograde Ventriculosinus Shunt as an Alternative for Treating Hydrocephalus in Children

Revisitando a derivação ventriculosinusal retrógrada como uma alternativa para tratamento de hidrocefalia em crianças
Matheus Fernandes Oliveira
1   Nuerosurgery Division, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira
1   Nuerosurgery Division, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Marcelo Lima Oliveira
1   Nuerosurgery Division, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Edson Bor Seng Shu
1   Nuerosurgery Division, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Fernando Campos Gomes Pinto
1   Nuerosurgery Division, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

03. November 2016

12. April 2017

Publikationsdatum:
12. Juni 2017 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Introduction Retrograde ventriculosinus shunt (RVSS) is a useful option in the daily routine of neurosurgeons dealing with hydrodynamics. The objective of this manuscript is to review the main data about RVSS.

Methods We performed a critical review. The keywords used were hydrocephalus, shunt, venous sinus, ventriculosinus shunt, retrograde ventriculosinus shunt, and sagittal sinus. The search was performed in the Medline (Pubmed) and EMBASE databases.

Results Van Canneyt et al (2008) and Pinto et al (2016) performed experimental studies confirming the effectiveness of RVSS. El Shafei et al (1985, 1987, 2001) authors reported several cases treated with efficacy and few complications. Oliveira et al (2015, 2016) compared RVSS and ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) in the treatment of hydrocephalus after myelomeningocele repair in infants, with similar functional results. Oliveira et al (2015, 2016) also described the applicability of RVSS in situations when VPS is not feasible, or when the peritoneum is not useful.

Discussion Retrograde ventriculosinus shunt is a safe and more physiological option, which requires the use of less prosthetic material. It is feasible and applicable. Especially in children, it generates a normotensive state after shunting, allowing centrifugal head growth, once there is no intracranial hypotension due to overdrainage, which may reflect in long-term better psychomotor development.

Conclusions The surgical technique of RVSS is feasible. The clinical results are comparable with those of the VPS.

Resumo

Introdução A derivação ventriculosinusal retrógrada (DVSR) deve ser uma opção na rotina de neurocirurgiões que trabalham com hidrodinâmica. O objetivo deste estudo é revisar os principais dados sobre DVSR.

Métodos Realizamos uma revisão crítica. As palavras-chave usadas foram hydrocephalus shunt, venous sinus, ventriculosinus shunt, retrograde ventriculosinus shunt, e sagittal sinus. A busca foi feita nas bases de dados Medline (Pubmed) e EMBASE.

Resultados Van Canneyt et al (2008) e Pinto et al (2016) realizaram estudos experimentais confirmando a eficiência do DVSR. El Shafei et al (1985, 1987, 2001) relataram vários casos tratados com eficiência e poucas complicações. Oliveira et al (2015, 2016) compararam DVSR e derivação ventriculoperitoneal (DVP) no tratamento de hidrocefalia após reparo de mielomeningocele em crianças, obtendo resultados funcionais similares. Oliveira et al (2015, 2016) também descreveram a aplicabilidade do DVSR em situações em que o DVP não é possível, ou o peritônio é hostil.

Discussão A DVSR é uma opção segura e mais fisiológica, que requer menos material protético; é factível e aplicável. Particularmente em crianças, gera um estado normotenso após o shunt, permitindo crescimento cefálico centrífugo, uma vez que não há mais hipotensão intracraniana devido à hiperdrenagem, o que pode refletir em melhor desenvolvimento psicomotor em longo prazo.

Conclusões A técnica cirúrgica DVSR é viável. Os resultados clínicos se são comparáveis à DVP.

Keywords

hydrocephalus - ventriculosinus shunt - treatment - review

Palavras-chave

hidrocefalia - shunt ventrículo-sinusal - tratamento - revisão
 

  • References

  • 1 Børgesen SE, Gjerris F, Agerlin N. Shunting to the sagittal sinus. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 2002; 81: 11-14
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Rainov NG, Weise JB, Burkert W. Transcranial Doppler sonography in adult hydrocephalic patients. Neurosurg Rev 2000; 23 (01) 34-38
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Rekate HL. Selecting patients for endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2004; 15 (01) 39-49
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Samadani U, Mattielo JA, Sutton LN. Ventriculosagittal sinus shunt placement: technical case report. Neurosurgery 2003; 53 (03) 778-779 , discussion 780
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Toma AK, Tarnaris A, Kitchen ND, Watkins LD. Ventriculosinus shunt. Neurosurg Rev 2010; 33 (02) 147-152 , discussion 153
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Van Canneyt K, Kips J, Mareels G, Baert E, Van Roost D, Verdonck P. Experimental and numerical modelling of the ventriculosinus shunt (El-Shafei shunt). Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2008; 222 (04) 455-464
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Warf BC. Hydrocephalus associated with neural tube defects: characteristics, management, and outcome in sub-Saharan Africa. Childs Nerv Syst 2011; 27 (10) 1589-1594
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 el-Shafei IL. Ventriculovenous shunt against the direction of blood flow: a new approach for shunting the cerebrospinal fluid to the venous circulation. Childs Nerv Syst 1985; 1 (04) 200-207
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Faggin R, Bernardo A, Stieg P, Perilongo G, d'Avella D. Hydrocephalus in infants less than six months of age: effectiveness of endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2009; 19 (04) 216-219
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Oliveira MF, Teixeira MJ, Reis RC, Petitto CE, Gomes Pinto FC. Failed Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt: Is Retrograde Ventriculosinus Shunt a Reliable Option?. World Neurosurg 2016; 92: 445-453
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Fox JL, McCullough DC, Green RC. Effect of CSF shunt on ICP and CSF dynamics. II. A new technique of pressure measurement, results and concepts. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1973; 30: 302-312
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Gupta N, Park J, Solomon C, Kranz DA, Wrensch M, Wu YW. Long-term outcomes in patients with treated childhood hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 2007; 106 (5, Suppl) 334-339
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hash CJ, Shenkin HA, Crowder LE. Ventricle to sagittal sinus shunt for hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 1979; 4 (05) 394-400
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Ingraham FD, Matson DD, Alexander Jr F, Woods RP. Studies in the treatment of experimental hydrocephalus. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1948; 7 (02) 123-143
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Jindal A, Mahapatra AK. Correlation of ventricular size and transcranial Doppler findings before and after ventricular peritoneal shunt in patients with hydrocephalus: prospective study of 35 patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998; 65 (02) 269-271
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Kadri H, Mawla AA. Variations of endoscopic ventricular anatomy in children suffering from hydrocephalus associated with myelomeningocele. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2004; 47 (06) 339-341
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Kestle JR, Walker MLJ. ; Strata Investigators. A multicenter prospective cohort study of the Strata valve for the management of hydrocephalus in pediatric patients. J Neurosurg 2005; 102 (2, Suppl) 141-145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Kondageski C, Thompson D, Reynolds M, Hayward RD. Experience with the Strata valve in the management of shunt overdrainage. J Neurosurg 2007; 106 (2, Suppl) 95-102
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Lo P, Drake JM. Shunt malfunctions. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2001; 12 (04) 695-701 , viii
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Nulsen FE, Spitz FB. Treatment of hydrocephalus by direct shunt from ventricle to jugular vein. Surg Forum Am Coil Surg 1951; 2: 399-408
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Oliveira MF, Saad F, Reis RC, Rotta JM, Pinto FC. Programmable valve represents an efficient and safe tool in the treatment of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus patients. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2013; 71 (04) 229-236
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Oliveira MF, Teixeira MJ, Norremose KA. , et al. Surgical technique of retrograde ventricle-sinus shunt is an option for the treatment of hydrocephalus in infants after surgical repair of myelomeningocele. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2015; 73 (12) 1019-1025
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Pavez A, Salazar C, Rivera R. , et al. Description of endoscopic ventricular anatomy in myelomeningocele. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2006; 49 (03) 161-167
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Pinto FC, Pereira RM, Saad F, Teixeira MJ. Performance of fixed-pressure valve with antisiphon device SPHERA(®) in hydrocephalus treatment and overdrainage prevention. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2012; 70 (09) 704-709
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Pinto FCG, Becco R, Alho EJL. , et al. The retrograde ventriculo-sinus shunt in an animal experimental model of hydrocephalus. Pediatr Neurosurg 2016; 51 (03) 142-148
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Portnoy HD, Schulte RR, Fox JL, Croissant PD, Tripp L. Anti-siphon and reversible occlusion valves for shunting in hydrocephalus and preventing post-shunt subdural hematomas. J Neurosurg 1973; 38 (06) 729-738
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Pudenz RH, Russell FE, Hurd AH, Shelden CH. Ventriculo-auriculostomy; a technique for shunting cerebrospinal fluid into the right auricle; preliminary report. J Neurosurg 1957; 14 (02) 171-179
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Teo C, Jones R. Management of hydrocephalus by endoscopic third ventriculostomy in patients with myelomeningocele. Pediatr Neurosurg 1996; 25 (02) 57-63 , discussion 63
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 El Shafei IL, El Shafei HI. The retrograde ventriculo-sinus shunt (El Shafei RVS shunt). Rationale, evolution, surgical technique and long-term results. Pediatr Neurosurg 2005; 41 (06) 305-317
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Wen HL. Ventriculo-superior sagittal sinus shunt for hydrocephalus. Surg Neurol 1982; 17 (06) 432-434
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Zemack G, Romner B. Seven years clinical experience with the Codman Hakim programmable valve: a retrospective study of 583 patients. J Neurosurg 2000; 92: 941-948
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 el-Shafei IL, el-Rifaii MA. Ventriculojugular shunt against the direction of blood flow. II. Theoretical and experimental basis for shunting the cerebrospinal fluid against the direction of blood flow. Childs Nerv Syst 1987; 3 (05) 285-291
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 el-Shafei IL, el-Rifaii MA. Ventriculojugular shunt against the direction of blood flow. I. Role of the internal jugular vein as an antisiphonage device. Childs Nerv Syst 1987; 3 (05) 282-284
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 El-Shafei IL, El-Shafei HI. The retrograde ventriculosinus shunt: concept and technique for treatment of hydrocephalus by shunting the cerebrospinal fluid to the superior sagittal sinus against the direction of blood flow. Preliminary report. Childs Nerv Syst 2001; 17 (08) 457-465 , discussion 466
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Browd SR, Ragel BT, Gottfried ON, Kestle JR. Failure of cerebrospinal fluid shunts: part I: Obstruction and mechanical failure. Pediatr Neurol 2006; 34 (02) 83-92
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Browd SR, Gottfried ON, Ragel BT, Kestle JR. Failure of cerebrospinal fluid shunts: part II: overdrainage, loculation, and abdominal complications. Pediatr Neurol 2006; 34 (03) 171-176
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Choux M, Camboulives J, Rigaut F. [Prevention of infections in ventriculoperitoneal shunts in children]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 1992; 11 (06) 699-704
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 de Souza RB, Pinto FC. Could craniometric measurements explain the growth of the superior sagittal sinus?. Pediatr Neurosurg 2012; 48 (04) 225-228
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Eklund A, Koskinen LO, Malm J. Features of the Sinushunt and its influence on the cerebrospinal fluid system. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004; 75 (08) 1156-1159
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 El Shafei IL. Ventriculo-venous shunt to the proximal segment of an occluded neck vein. A new method for shunting the cerebrospinal fluid to the venous circulation. Surg Neurol 1975; 3 (05) 237-244
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 El Shafei IL. Ventriculovenous shunt to the proximal segment of a ligated neck vein. A new surgical technique for shunting the cerebrospinal fluid to the venous circulation (preliminary report). Childs Brain 1975; 1 (05) 311-323
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Elgamal EA. Natural history of hydrocephalus in children with spinal open neural tube defect. Surg Neurol Int 2012; 3: 112
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 El-Shafei IL, El-Shafei HI. The retrograde ventriculovenous shunts: the El-Shafei retrograde ventriculojugular and ventriculosinus shunts. Pediatr Neurosurg 2010; 46 (03) 160-171
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 el-Shafei IL. Ventriculojugular shunt against the direction of blood flow. III. Operative technique and results. Childs Nerv Syst 1987; 3 (06) 342-349
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Børgesen SE, Pieri A, Cappelen J, Agerlin N, Gjerris F. Shunting to the cranial venous sinus using the SinuShunt. Childs Nerv Syst 2004; 20 (06) 397-404
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Adzick NS, Thom EA, Spong CY. , et al; MOMS Investigators. A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele. N Engl J Med 2011; 364 (11) 993-1004
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Alexandrov AV, Sloan MA, Tegeler CH. , et al; American Society of Neuroimaging Practice Guidelines Committee. Practice standards for transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasound. Part II. Clinical indications and expected outcomes. J Neuroimaging 2012; 22 (03) 215-224
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Behrens A, Lenfeldt N, Ambarki K, Malm J, Eklund A, Koskinen LO. Transcranial Doppler pulsatility index: not an accurate method to assess intracranial pressure. Neurosurgery 2010; 66 (06) 1050-1057
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 de Oliveira MF, Teixeira MJ, de Lima Oliveira M, Seng-Shu EB, Norremose KA, Gomes Pinto FC. Transcranial Doppler in the evaluation of infants treated with retrograde ventriculosinus shunt. Childs Nerv Syst 2016; 32 (11) 2133-2142
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar