Rater Reliability of the Hardy Classification for Pituitary Adenomas in the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Era

Abstract

Objectives The Hardy classification is used to classify pituitary tumors for clinical and research purposes. The scale was developed using lateral skull radiographs and encephalograms, and its reliability has not been evaluated in the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) era.

Design Fifty preoperative MRI scans of biopsy-proven pituitary adenomas using the sellar invasion and suprasellar extension components of the Hardy scale were reviewed.

Setting This study was a cohort study set at a single institution.

Participants There were six independent raters.

Main Outcome Measures The main outcome measures of this study were interrater reliability, intrarater reliability, and percent agreement.

Results Overall interrater reliability of both Hardy subscales on MRI was strong. However, reliability of the intermediate scores was weak, and percent agreement among raters was poor (12–16%) using the full scales. Dichotomizing the scale into clinically useful groups maintained strong interrater reliability for the sellar invasion scale and increased the percent agreement for both scales.

Conclusion This study raises important questions about the reliability of the original Hardy classification. Editing the measure to a clinically relevant dichotomous scale simplifies the rating process and may be useful for preoperative tumor characterization in the MRI era. Future research studies should use the dichotomized Hardy scale (sellar invasion Grades 0–III versus Grade IV, suprasellar extension Types 0–C versus Type D).

Keywords

pituitary adenoma - rater reliability - transsphenoidal

Disclosure

None.

Financial Support

None.

• References

• 1 Hardy J, Vezina JL. Transsphenoidal neurosurgery of intracranial neoplasm. Adv Neurol 1976; 15: 261-273
• 2 Hardy J. Atlas of Transsphenoidal Microsurgery in Pituitary Tumors. New York, NY: Igaku-Shoin Medical Publishers; 1991
• 3 Hardy J. Transsphenoidal Microsurgical Treatment of Pituitary Tumors. New York: Raven Press; 1979
• 4 Onoz M, Basaran R, Gucluer B. , et al. Correlation between SPARC (osteonectin) expression with immunophenotypical and invasion characteristics of pituitary adenomas. APMIS 2015; 123 (03) 199-204
• 5 Hong JW, Ku CR, Kim SH, Lee EJ. Characteristics of acromegaly in Korea with a literature review. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) 2013; 28 (03) 164-168
• 6 Ku CR, Kim EH, Oh MC, Lee EJ, Kim SH. Surgical and endocrinological outcomes in the treatment of growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas according to the shift of surgical paradigm. Neurosurgery 2012; 71 (2, suppl operative): ons192-ons203 , discussion ons203
• 7 D'Haens J, Van Rompaey K, Stadnik T, Haentjens P, Poppe K, Velkeniers B. Fully endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for functioning pituitary adenomas: a retrospective comparison with traditional transsphenoidal microsurgery in the same institution. Surg Neurol 2009; 72 (04) 336-340
• 8 Gondim JA, Tella Jr OI, Schops M. Intrasellar pressure and tumor volume in pituitary tumor: relation study. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2006; 64 (04) 971-975
• 9 Alleyne Jr CH, Barrow DL, Oyesiku NM. Combined transsphenoidal and pterional craniotomy approach to giant pituitary tumors. Surg Neurol 2002; 57 (06) 380-390 , discussion 390
• 10 Nam DH, Song SY, Park K. , et al. Clinical significance of molecular genetic changes in sporadic invasive pituitary adenomas. Exp Mol Med 2001; 33 (03) 111-116
• 11 Kim K, Arai K, Sanno N, Osamura RY, Teramoto A, Shibasaki T. Ghrelin and growth hormone (GH) secretagogue receptor (GHSR) mRNA expression in human pituitary adenomas. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2001; 54 (06) 759-768
• 12 Gökalp HZ, Deda H, Attar A, Uğur HC, Arasil E, Egemen N. The neurosurgical management of prolactinomas. J Neurosurg Sci 2000; 44 (03) 128-132
• 13 Bates AS, Farrell WE, Bicknell EJ. , et al. Allelic deletion in pituitary adenomas reflects aggressive biological activity and has potential value as a prognostic marker. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1997; 82 (03) 818-824
• 14 Mooney MA, Hardesty DA, Sheehy JP. , et al. Interrater and intrarater reliability of the Knosp scale for pituitary adenoma grading. J Neurosurg 2017; 126 (05) 1714-1719
• 15 Ames CP, Smith JS, Eastlack R. , et al; International Spine Study Group. Reliability assessment of a novel cervical spine deformity classification system. J Neurosurg Spine 2015; 23 (06) 673-683
• 16 Vachhrajani S, Sen AN, Satyan K, Kulkarni AV, Birchansky SB, Jea A. Estimation of normal computed tomography measurements for the upper cervical spine in the pediatric age group. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2014; 14 (04) 425-433
• 17 Cordova JS, Schreibmann E, Hadjipanayis CG. , et al. Quantitative tumor segmentation for evaluation of extent of glioblastoma resection to facilitate multisite clinical trials. Transl Oncol 2014; 7 (01) 40-47
• 18 Griessenauer CJ, Miller JH, Agee BS. , et al. Observer reliability of arteriovenous malformations grading scales using current imaging modalities. J Neurosurg 2014; 120 (05) 1179-1187
• 19 Frisoli FA, Lang SS, Vossough A. , et al. Intrarater and interrater reliability of the pediatric arteriovenous malformation compactness score in children. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2013; 11 (05) 547-551
• 20 Jiménez-Roldán L, Alén JF, Gómez PA. , et al. Volumetric analysis of subarachnoid hemorrhage: assessment of the reliability of two computerized methods and their comparison with other radiographic scales. J Neurosurg 2013; 118 (01) 84-93
• 21 Gordon AS, Westrick AC, Falola MI, Shannon CN, Walters BC, Fisher WS. Reliability of postoperative photographs in assessment of facial nerve function after vestibular schwannoma resection. J Neurosurg 2012; 117 (05) 860-863
• 22 Thaler M, Lechner R, Gstöttner M. , et al. Interrater and intrarater reliability of the Kuntz et al new deformity classification system. Neurosurgery 2012; 71 (01) 47-57
• 23 Harrop JS, Vaccaro AR, Hurlbert RJ. , et al; Spine Trauma Study Group. Intrarater and interrater reliability and validity in the assessment of the mechanism of injury and integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex: a novel injury severity scoring system for thoracolumbar injuries. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2005. J Neurosurg Spine 2006; 4 (02) 118-122
• 24 Kulkarni AV, Riva-Cambrin J, Browd SR. Use of the ETV success score to explain the variation in reported endoscopic third ventriculostomy success rates among published case series of childhood hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2011; 7 (02) 143-146