High Varus Angle and Lower Posterior Tibial Slope Associated with PCL Injury in Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty: An MRI Study

Abstract

The posterior tibial slope (PTS) is important for performing a tibial cut that does not injure the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). In this study, the amount of PCL fibers sacrificed under simulated tibial cuts with varying posterior inclinations was evaluated using magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of osteoarthritic varus knees. Knee X-rays, orthoroentgenograms, and MRIs of 113 Kellgren and Lawrence grades 3 to 4 osteoarthritic knees were included. Four different simulated tibial cuts were performed at 0, 3, 5 degrees and parallel to the tibia plateau 3 mm below of the most defective part of the cartilage in the medial plateau. Correlations between the PCL avulsion amount and the PTS and varus alignment of the lower extremity were analyzed for all four simulated tibial cut levels. The maximum amount of PCL was preserved with a 0-degree tibial cut in patients with a PTS of more than 8 degrees. With increased tibial cut angles, the posterior slope resulted in an increased amount of avulsed PCL. Although the amount of avulsed PCL was proportional with the varus alignment, it was inversely proportional with the sagittal slope. The number of injured PCLs also increased as the slope of the tibial cuts increased. Patients with mild varus alignments and high PTSs are more suitable for cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Keywords

total knee arthroplasty - posterior cruciate ligament - cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty - tibial cut - magnetic resonance - knee osteoarthritis

• References

• 1 Jiang C, Liu Z, Wang Y, Bian Y, Feng B, Weng X. Posterior cruciate ligament retention versus posterior stabilization for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2016; 11 (01) e0147865
• 2 Verra WC, van den Boom LG, Jacobs W, Clement DJ, Wymenga AA, Nelissen RG. Retention versus sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty for treating osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 10 (10) CD004803
• 3 Conditt MA, Noble PC, Bertolusso R, Woody J, Parsley BS. The PCL significantly affects the functional outcome of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19 (7, suppl 2): 107-112
• 4 Luo SX, Zhao JM, Su W, Li XF, Dong GF. Posterior cruciate substituting versus posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty prostheses: a meta-analysis. Knee 2012; 19 (04) 246-252
• 5 Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Mahfouz MR, Walker SA, Tucker A. A multicenter analysis of axial femorotibial rotation after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (428) 180-189
• 6 Martins GC, Camanho G, Rodrigues MI. Immunohistochemical analysis of the neural structures of the posterior cruciate ligament in osteoarthritis patients submitted to total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of thirty-four cases. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2015; 70 (02) 81-86
• 7 D'Anchise R, Andreata M, Balbino C, Manta N. Posterior cruciate ligament-retaining and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: differences in surgical technique. Joints 2013; 1 (01) 5-9
• 8 Moorman III CT, Murphy Zane MS, Bansai S. , et al. Tibial insertion of the posterior cruciate ligament: a sagittal plane analysis using gross, histologic, and radiographic methods. Arthroscopy 2008; 24 (03) 269-275
• 9 Cinotti G, Sessa P, Ragusa G. , et al. Influence of cartilage and menisci on the sagittal slope of the tibial plateaus. Clin Anat 2013; 26 (07) 883-892
• 10 Cinotti G, Sessa P, Amato M, Ripani FR, Giannicola G. Preserving the PCL during the tibial cut in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3236-6.
• 11 Shannon FJ, Cronin JJ, Cleary MS, Eustace SJ, O'Byrne JM. The posterior cruciate ligament-preserving total knee replacement: do we ‘preserve’ it? A radiological study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89 (06) 766-771
• 12 Sessa P, Fioravanti G, Giannicola G, Cinotti G. The risk of sacrificing the PCL in cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty and the relationship to the sagittal inclination of the tibial plateau. Knee 2015; 22 (01) 51-55
• 13 Nunley RM, Nam D, Johnson SR, Barnes CL. Extreme variability in posterior slope of the proximal tibia: measurements on 2395 CT scans of patients undergoing UKA?. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (08) 1677-1680
• 14 Hashemi J, Chandrashekar N, Gill B. , et al. The geometry of the tibial plateau and its influence on the biomechanics of the tibiofemoral joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90 (12) 2724-2734
• 15 Matziolis G, Mehlhorn S, Schattat N. , et al. How much of the PCL is really preserved during the tibial cut?. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; 20 (06) 1083-1086
• 16 Freeman MA, Pinskerova V. The movement of the normal tibio-femoral joint. J Biomech 2005; 38 (02) 197-208
• 17 Swanik CB, Lephart SM, Rubash HE. Proprioception, kinesthesia, and balance after total knee arthroplasty with cruciate-retaining and posterior stabilized prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A [phone]
• 18 Pagnano MW, Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG, Stuart MJ. Flexion instability after primary posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; (356) 39-46
• 19 Roh YW, Jang J, Choi WC. , et al. Preservation of the posterior cruciate ligament is not helpful in highly conforming mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21 (12) 2850-2859
• 20 Lei P, Sun R, Hu Y, Li K, Liao Z. Biomechanic effect of posterior cruciate ligament rupture on lateral meniscus. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015; 8 (06) 9620-9629
• 21 Zelle J, Heesterbeek PJ, De Waal Malefijt M, Verdonschot N. Numerical analysis of variations in posterior cruciate ligament properties and balancing techniques on total knee arthroplasty loading. Med Eng Phys 2010; 32 (07) 700-707
• 22 Onishi Y, Hino K, Watanabe S, Watamori K, Kutsuna T, Miura H. The influence of tibial resection on the PCL in PCL-retaining total knee arthroplasty: a clinical and cadaveric study. J Orthop Sci 2016; 21 (06) 798-803