PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Clinical Interventional Radiology ISVIR 2017; 01(02): 089-095
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1603196
Review Article
Indian Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Expanding Role of Endovascular Repair for Type B Aortic Dissection

Sanjiv Sharma
1   Department of Cardiovascular Radiology and Endovascular Interventions, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
,
Arun Sharma
1   Department of Cardiovascular Radiology and Endovascular Interventions, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
28. Juli 2017 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Aortic dissection is a medical emergency that can quickly lead to death, despite optimal treatment. The Stanford classification is widely used and is in close relationship to clinical practice, as type A dissections require primary surgical repair whereas type B dissections are treated medically as initial treatment with surgery or endovascular repair (EVR) reserved for any complications. Multislice CT is the investigation of choice to establish the diagnosis and plan treatment strategies. Therapeutic strategies differ for treatment of an acute dissection compared with a chronic dissection. Traditionally, most institutions favor a “complication specific” approach for type B dissection with antihypertensive treatment and use of β-blockers as primary therapy. Surgery or EVR is reserved for patients with recurrent pain, life-threatening complications, or rapid aortic expansion. With above algorithms, there is evidence that 30 to 50% patients on conservative therapy develop serious morbidity or mortality over 5-year period. Clinical and imaging markers of adverse outcome are being identified to revise the management strategies and offer EVR to those at risk for adverse outcome. This is especially relevant in view of the fact that EVR for type B dissection is associated with procedural success in 99.2 ± 0.1% patients. Overall survival rates of 96.9% at 30 days, 96.7% at 6 months, 96.4% at 1 year, 95.6% at 2 years, and 95.2% at 5 years are reported after EVR in type B dissections. There is emerging evidence that EVR may be noninferior to surgery in this group of patients. These observations along with the development of dissection-specific device designs have the potential to rewrite the management algorithms for type B aortic dissection and define the role of EVR in this disease.

Keywords

aortic dissection - endovascular repair - surgery - type B dissection
 

  • References

  • 1 Elefteriades JA, Rizzo JA. Epidemiology, prevalence, incidence, trends. In: Elefteriades JA. , ed. Acute Aortic Disease. New York, NY: Informa Healthcare; 2008: 89-98
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Mehta RH, Bossone E, Evangelista A. , et al; International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection Investigators. Acute type B aortic dissection in elderly patients: clinical features, outcomes, and simple risk stratification rule. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77 (05) 1622-1628 , discussion 1629
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Hagan PG, Nienaber CA, Isselbacher EM. , et al. The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD): new insights into an old disease. JAMA 2000; 283 (07) 897-903
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Cerna M, Kocher M, Thomas RP. Acute aorta, overview of acute CT findings and endovascular treatment options. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 2017; 161 (01) 14-23
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Erbel R, Alfonso F, Boileau C. , et al; Task Force on Aortic Dissection, European Society of Cardiology. Diagnosis and management of aortic dissection. Eur Heart J 2001; 22 (18) 1642-1681
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Elefteriades JA, Farkas EA. Thoracic aortic aneurysm clinically pertinent controversies and uncertainties. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55 (09) 841-857
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Yuan SM. Postpartum aortic dissection. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 52 (03) 318-322
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Manfredini R, Boari B, Gallerani M. , et al. Chronobiology of rupture and dissection of aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2004; 40 (02) 382-388
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Muhs BE, Vincken KL, van Prehn J. , et al. Dynamic cine-CT angiography for the evaluation of the thoracic aorta; insight in dynamic changes with implications for thoracic endograft treatment. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006; 32 (05) 532-536
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Ueda T, Fleischmann D, Rubin GD, Dake MD, Sze DY. Imaging of the thoracic aorta before and after stent-graft repair of aneurysms and dissections. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008; 20 (04) 348-357
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Nienaber CA, Eagle KA. Aortic dissection: new frontiers in diagnosis and management: Part II: therapeutic management and follow-up. Circulation 2003; 108 (06) 772-778
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Criado FJ. Aortic dissection: a 250-year perspective. Tex Heart Inst J 2011; 38 (06) 694-700
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Onitsuka S, Akashi H, Tayama K. , et al. Long-term outcome and prognostic predictors of medically treated acute type B aortic dissections. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 78 (04) 1268-1273
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Akin I, Kische S, Ince H, Nienaber CA. Indication, timing and results of endovascular treatment of type B dissection. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2009; 37 (03) 289-296
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Schneider AJ. Assessment of risk factors and surgical outcome. Surg Clin North Am 1983; 63 (05) 1113-1126
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Feldman M, Shah M, Elefteriades JA. Medical management of acute type A aortic dissection. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009; 15 (05) 286-293
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Walsh SR, Tang TY, Sadat U. , et al. Endovascular stenting versus open surgery for thoracic aortic disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative results. J Vasc Surg 2008; 47 (05) 1094-1098
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Coady MA, Rizzo JA, Hammond GL, Kopf GS, Elefteriades JA. Surgical intervention criteria for thoracic aortic aneurysms: a study of growth rates and complications. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 67 (06) 1922-1926 , discussion 1953–1958
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Dake MD, Miller DC, Semba CP, Mitchell RS, Walker PJ, Liddell RP. Transluminal placement of endovascular stent-grafts for the treatment of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med 1994; 331 (26) 1729-1734
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Xiong J, Jiang B, Guo W, Wang SM, Tong XY. Endovascular stent graft placement in patients with type B aortic dissection: a meta-analysis in China. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009; 138 (04) 865-872
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Fann JI, Smith JA, Miller DC. , et al. Surgical management of aortic dissection during a 30-year period. Circulation 1995; 92 (9, Suppl): II113-II121
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Duarte JJ, Pontes JC, Benfatti RA, Ferrachini AL, Karakhanian WK, Razuk Filho A. Indication of endovascular treatment of type B aortic dissection—literature review. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc 2014; 29 (03) 396-401
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Jonker FH, Trimarchi S, Verhagen HJ, Moll FL, Sumpio BE, Muhs BE. Meta-analysis of open versus endovascular repair for ruptured descending thoracic aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 2010; 51 (04) 1026-1032 , 1032.e1–1032.e2
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Nienaber CA, Rousseau H, Eggebrecht H. , et al; INSTEAD Trial. Randomized comparison of strategies for type B aortic dissection: the INvestigation of STEnt Grafts in Aortic Dissection (INSTEAD) trial. Circulation 2009; 120 (25) 2519-2528
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Parsa CJ, Schroder JN, Daneshmand MA, McCann RL, Hughes GC. Midterm results for endovascular repair of complicated acute and chronic type B aortic dissection. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 89 (01) 97-102 , discussion 102–104
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Eggebrecht H, Nienaber CA, Neuhäuser M. , et al. Endovascular stent-graft placement in aortic dissection: a meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 2006; 27 (04) 489-498
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Evangelista A, Salas A, Ribera A. , et al. Long-term outcome of aortic dissection with patent false lumen: predictive role of entry tear size and location. Circulation 2012; 125 (25) 3133-3141
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Kitada S, Akutsu K, Tamori Y, Yoshimuta T, Hashimoto H, Takeshita S. Usefulness of fibrinogen/fibrin degradation product to predict poor one-year outcome of medically treated patients with acute type B aortic dissection. Am J Cardiol 2008; 101 (09) 1341-1344
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Luebke T, Brunkwall J, Type B. Type B aortic dissection: a review of prognostic factors and meta-analysis of treatment options. Aorta (Stamford) 2014; 2 (06) 265-278
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Jonker FH, Trimarchi S, Rampoldi V. , et al; International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) Investigators. Aortic expansion after acute type B aortic dissection. Ann Thorac Surg 2012; 94 (04) 1223-1229
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Tolenaar JL, van Keulen JW, Jonker FH. , et al. Morphologic predictors of aortic dilatation in type B aortic dissection. J Vasc Surg 2013; 58 (05) 1220-1225
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Clough RE, Albayati MA, Donati T, Taylor PR. Uncomplicated type B dissections: which patients should be treated? Lessons learned from the recent literature. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2014; 55 (02) (Suppl. 01) 145-150
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Grommes J, Greiner A, Bendermacher B. , et al. Risk factors for mortality and failure of conservative treatment after aortic type B dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 148 (05) 2155-2160.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Tsai TT, Evangelista A, Nienaber CA. , et al; International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection. Partial thrombosis of the false lumen in patients with acute type B aortic dissection. N Engl J Med 2007; 357 (04) 349-359
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Song JM, Kim SD, Kim JH. , et al. Long-term predictors of descending aorta aneurysmal change in patients with aortic dissection. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50 (08) 799-804
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Loewe C, Czerny M, Sodeck GH. , et al. A new mechanism by which an acute type B aortic dissection is primarily complicated, becomes complicated, or remains uncomplicated. Ann Thorac Surg 2012; 93 (04) 1215-1222
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Kitamura T, Torii S, Oka N. , et al. Key success factors for thoracic endovascular aortic repair for non-acute Stanford type B aortic dissection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2014; 46 (03) 432-437 , discussion 437
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Fattori R, Cao P, De Rango P. , et al. Interdisciplinary expert consensus document on management of type B aortic dissection. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 61 (16) 1661-1678
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Fattori R, Tsai TT, Myrmel T. , et al. Complicated acute type B dissection: is surgery still the best option? A report from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2008; 1 (04) 395-402
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Trimarchi S, Eagle KA, Nienaber CA. , et al; International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) Investigators. Importance of refractory pain and hypertension in acute type B aortic dissection: insights from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD). Circulation 2010; 122 (13) 1283-1289
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Leurs LJ, Bell R, Degrieck Y, Thomas S, Hobo R, Lundbom J. ; EUROSTAR; UK Thoracic Endograft Registry collaborators. Endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic diseases: combined experience from the EUROSTAR and United Kingdom Thoracic Endograft registries. J Vasc Surg 2004; 40 (04) 670-679 , discussion 679–680
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Fattori R, Montgomery D, Lovato L. , et al. Survival after endovascular therapy in patients with type B aortic dissection: a report from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013; 6 (08) 876-882
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Zeeshan A, Woo EY, Bavaria JE. , et al. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for acute complicated type B aortic dissection: superiority relative to conventional open surgical and medical therapy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 140 (6, Suppl): S109-S115 , discussion S142–S146
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Nienaber CA, Kische S, Rousseau H. , et al; INSTEAD-XL trial. Endovascular repair of type B aortic dissection: long-term results of the randomized investigation of stent grafts in aortic dissection trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2013; 6 (04) 407-416
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Garbade J, Jenniches M, Borger MA. , et al. Outcome of patients suffering from acute type B aortic dissection: a retrospective single-centre analysis of 135 consecutive patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010; 38 (03) 285-292
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Brunkwall J, Kasprzak P, Verhoeven E. , et al; ADSORB Trialists. Endovascular repair of acute uncomplicated aortic type B dissection promotes aortic remodelling: 1 year results of the ADSORB trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2014; 48 (03) 285-291
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 VIRTUE Registry Investigators. Mid-term outcomes and aortic remodelling after thoracic endovascular repair for acute, subacute, and chronic aortic dissection: the VIRTUE Registry. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2014; 48 (04) 363-371
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Akutsu K, Nejima J, Kiuchi K. , et al. Effects of the patent false lumen on the long-term outcome of type B acute aortic dissection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004; 26 (02) 359-366
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar