Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1602759
One versus Two Venous Anastomoses in Microvascular Upper Extremity Reconstruction
Publication History
27 November 2016
23 March 2017
Publication Date:
04 May 2017 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/jrm/201707/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055-s-0037-1602759_160332-1.jpg)
Abstract
Background Free tissue transfers are routinely performed for reconstruction of the upper limb. Main complication in free flap surgery still stems from vascular compromise and many technical controversies exist regarding the technical details of how to perform the microvascular anastomosis. This study evaluates outcomes regarding the execution of one versus two venous anastomoses for upper limb reconstruction.
Methods In this study, 79 patients underwent 86 free anterolateral thigh (ALT) or groin flaps for upper limb reconstruction after trauma, infection, or malignancies. The data were retrospectively screened for patients' demographics, perioperative details, flap survival, and surgical complications. The cases were divided into two groups regarding the number of performed venous anastomoses: one versus two veins.
Results No significant differences existed between the two groups regarding preoperative comorbidities (ALT: 16 one, 21 two veins; groin: 16 one, 33 two veins). Overall, there was no significant difference regarding the rate of major (1 vein: 18.8% vs. 2 veins: 20.4%; p > 0.05) and minor (1 vein: 3.1% vs. 2 veins: 3.7%; p > 0.05) surgical complications during the 3-month follow-up period. Major complications included total flap losses of 9.4% (1 vein) versus 7.4% (2 veins) (p > 0.05).
Conclusion This study analyzed a series of microsurgical reconstructions with a focus on the impact of the number of performed venous anastomoses. The findings suggest that successful free tissue transfer for upper limb reconstruction can be achieved independent of the number of venous anastomoses. However, to promote additional safety, a second vein should be performed whenever technically possible.
-
References
- 1 Lin CH, Lin YT, Yeh JT, Chen CT. Free functioning muscle transfer for lower extremity posttraumatic composite structure and functional defect. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (07) 2118-2126
- 2 Lorenzo AR, Lin CH, Lin CH. , et al. Selection of the recipient vein in microvascular flap reconstruction of the lower extremity: analysis of 362 free-tissue transfers. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011; 64 (05) 649-655
- 3 Pederson WC. Upper extremity microsurgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 107 (06) 1524-1537 , discussion 1538–1539, 1540–1543
- 4 Spindler N, Al-Benna S, Ring A. , et al. Free anterolateral thigh flaps for upper extremity soft tissue reconstruction. GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW 2015; 4: Doc05
- 5 Riot S, Herlin C, Mojallal A. , et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of double venous anastomosis in free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 136 (06) 1299-1311
- 6 Tran NV, Buchel EW, Convery PA. Microvascular complications of DIEP flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (05) 1397-1405 , discussion 1406–1408
- 7 Hanasono MM, Kocak E, Ogunleye O, Hartley CJ, Miller MJ. One versus two venous anastomoses in microvascular free flap surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (05) 1548-1557
- 8 Khouri RK, Cooley BC, Kunselman AR. , et al. A prospective study of microvascular free-flap surgery and outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (03) 711-721
- 9 Fernandez EJ, Nadal RD, Gonzalez SM, Caffee HH. The effect of stasis on a microvascular anastomosis. Microsurgery 1983; 4 (03) 176-177
- 10 Strecker WB, Wood MB, Schroeder AR. Stasis-induced thrombosis of rat microvascular anastomosis. J Reconstr Microsurg 1987; 4 (01) 69-73
- 11 Chen WF, Kung YP, Kang YC, Lawrence WT, Tsao CK. An old controversy revisited-one versus two venous anastomoses in microvascular head and neck reconstruction using anterolateral thigh flap. Microsurgery 2014; 34 (05) 377-383
- 12 Ichinose A, Terashi H, Nakahara M. , et al. Do multiple venous anastomoses reduce risk of thrombosis in free-flap transfer? Efficacy of dual anastomoses of separate venous systems. Ann Plast Surg 2004; 52 (01) 61-63
- 13 Ross GL, Ang ES, Lannon D. , et al. Ten-year experience of free flaps in head and neck surgery. How necessary is a second venous anastomosis?. Head Neck 2008; 30 (08) 1086-1089
- 14 Miller TJ, Jeong HS, Davis K. , et al. Evaluation of the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification system in risk assessment for plastic and reconstructive surgery patients. Aesthet Surg J 2014; 34 (03) 448-456
- 15 Muramatsu K, Shigetomi M, Ihara K, Kawai S, Doi K. Vascular complication in free tissue transfer to the leg. Microsurgery 2001; 21 (08) 362-365
- 16 Spector JA, Levine S, Levine JP. Free tissue transfer to the lower extremity distal to the zone of injury: indications and outcomes over a 25-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (04) 952-959
- 17 Tsai TM, Bennett DL, Pederson WC, Matiko J. Complications and vascular salvage of free-tissue transfers to the extremities. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988; 82 (06) 1022-1026
- 18 Gorman PW, Barnes CL, Fischer TJ, McAndrew MP, Moore MM. Soft-tissue reconstruction in severe lower extremity trauma. A review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; (243) 57-64
- 19 Grotting JC. Prevention of complications and correction of postoperative problems in microsurgery of the lower extremity. Clin Plast Surg 1991; 18 (03) 485-489
- 20 Han Z, Li J, Li H, Su M, Qin L. Single versus dual venous anastomoses of the free fibula osteocutaneous flap in mandibular reconstruction: a retrospective study. Microsurgery 2013; 33 (08) 652-655
- 21 Lee YC, Chen WC, Chen SH. , et al. One versus two venous anastomoses in anterolateral thigh flap reconstruction after oral cancer ablation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (02) 481-489
- 22 Ahmadi I, Herle P, Rozen WM, Leong J. One versus two venous anastomoses in microsurgical free flaps: a meta-analysis. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; 30 (06) 413-418
- 23 Enajat M, Rozen WM, Whitaker IS, Smit JM, Acosta R. A single center comparison of one versus two venous anastomoses in 564 consecutive DIEP flaps: investigating the effect on venous congestion and flap survival. Microsurgery 2010; 30 (03) 185-191
- 24 Futran ND, Stack Jr BC. Single versus dual venous drainage of the radial forearm free flap. Am J Otolaryngol 1996; 17 (02) 112-117
- 25 Liu Y, Jiang X, Huang J. , et al. Reliability of the superficial venous drainage of the radial forearm free flaps in oral and maxillofacial reconstruction. Microsurgery 2008; 28 (04) 243-247
- 26 Fahmy HW, Moneim MS. The effect of prolonged blood stasis on a microarterial repair. J Reconstr Microsurg 1988; 4 (02) 139-143
- 27 Ghosh A, Jayakumar R. Free groin flap for recurrent severe contractures of the neck in children. Indian J Plast Surg 2010; 43 (Suppl): S80-S84
- 28 Matsuda K, Tomita K, Fukai M. , et al. Vein/arterial grafts harvested within the incision for a free groin flap. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2015; 3 (06) e407
- 29 Khashaba AA, McGregor IA. Haemodynamics of the radial forearm flap. Br J Plast Surg 1986; 39 (04) 441-450