J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33(06): 441-445
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1600133
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA

Surgeon-Based 3D Printing for Microvascular Bone Flaps

Erin M. Taylor
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Matthew L. Iorio
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
2   Department of Orthopaedics, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

22 October 2016

29 January 2017

Publication Date:
04 March 2017 (online)

Abstract

Background Three-dimensional (3D) printing has developed as a revolutionary technology with the capacity to design accurate physical models in preoperative planning. We present our experience in surgeon-based design of 3D models, using home 3D software and printing technology for use as an adjunct in vascularized bone transfer.

Methods Home 3D printing techniques were used in the design and execution of vascularized bone flap transfers to the upper extremity. Open source imaging software was used to convert preoperative computed tomography scans and create 3D models. These were printed in the surgeon's office as 3D models for the planned reconstruction. Vascularized bone flaps were designed intraoperatively based on the 3D printed models.

Results Three-dimensional models were created for intraoperative use in vascularized bone flaps, including (1) medial femoral trochlea (MFT) flap for scaphoid avascular necrosis and nonunion, (2) MFT flap for lunate avascular necrosis and nonunion, (3) medial femoral condyle (MFC) flap for wrist arthrodesis, and (4) free fibula osteocutaneous flap for distal radius septic nonunion. Templates based on the 3D models allowed for the precise and rapid contouring of well-vascularized bone flaps in situ, prior to ligating the donor pedicle.

Conclusions Surgeon-based 3D printing is a feasible, innovative technology that allows for the precise and rapid contouring of models that can be created in various configurations for pre- and intraoperative planning. The technology is easy to use, convenient, and highly economical as compared with traditional send-out manufacturing. Surgeon-based 3D printing is a useful adjunct in vascularized bone transfer.

Level of Evidence Level IV.

 
  • References

  • 1 Chae MP, Rozen WM, McMenamin PG, Findlay MW, Spychal RT, Hunter-Smith DJ. Emerging applications of bedside 3d printing in plastic surgery. Front Surg 2015; 2: 25
  • 2 Gerstle TL, Ibrahim AM, Kim PS, Lee BT, Lin SJ. A plastic surgery application in evolution: three-dimensional printing. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133 (02) 446-451
  • 3 Burn MB, Ta A, Gogola GR. Three- dimensional printing of prosthetic hands for c hildren. J Hand Surg Am 2016; 41 (05) e103-e109
  • 4 Winder J, Bibb R. Medical rapid prototyping technologies: state of the art and current limitations for application in oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 63 (07) 1006-1015
  • 5 Choi JW, Kim N. Clinical application of three-dimensional printing technology in craniofacial plastic surgery. Arch Plast Surg 2015; 42 (03) 267-277
  • 6 Liu YF, Xu LW, Zhu HY, Liu SS. Technical procedures for template-guided surgery for mandibular reconstruction based on digital design and manufacturing. Biomed Eng Online 2014; 13: 63
  • 7 Ventola CL. Medical a pplications for 3D Printing: c urrent and p rojected u ses. P&T 2014; 39 (10) 704-711
  • 8 Tan H, Yang K, Wei P. , et al. A novel preoperative planning technique using a combination of ct angiography and three-dimensional printing for complex toe-to-hand reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2015; 31 (05) 369-377
  • 9 Chae MP, Hunter-Smith DJ, De-Silva I, Tham S, Spychal RT, Rozen WM. Four-d imensional (4D) printing: a new evolution in computed tomography-guided stereolithographic modeling. Principles and a pplication. J Reconstr Microsurg 2015; 31 (06) 458-463