Do Flow and Pulsatility Index within the Accepted Ranges Predict Long-Term Outcomes after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting?

Abstract

Background Transit-time flow measurement (TTFM) is the gold standard for intraoperative detection of graft failure. Several reports show that TTFM and distal coronary bed quality (DCBQ) may also be useful for midterm detection of graft failure. Nonetheless, there are no data regarding their predictive role on long-term outcomes.

Methods Patients with three-vessel disease who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in 2006 and received at least one graft to the left anterior descending artery (LAD) or to the first obtuse marginal (OM1) or posterior descending artery (PDA) were included. Baseline characteristics, mean graft flow, pulsatility index, and subjective impression of DCBQ for each coronary territory were collected. Long-term cardiovascular (CV) and overall survival, operative mortality, and new percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were evaluated.

Results A total of 177 patients underwent isolated CABG. The OM1 was grafted in 131 patients, the LAD in 169 patients, and the PDA in 100 patients. Neither DQCB nor TTFM were predictors for new PCI. Independent predictors for overall survival were age, previous acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and DQCB of OM1 (odds ratio [OR] = 2.97; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15–7.71). Age, previous AMI, and DCBQ of OM1 (OR = 2.5; 95% CI: 1.39–4.81) were independent predictors for CV survival.

Conclusions TTFM on patients with functioning grafts does not predict long-term survival or performance of new PCI. Subjective evaluation of distal coronary bed, especially of the OM1, has a strong impact on long-term outcomes.

Keywords

coronary artery bypass grafts - CABG - coronary artery disease - transit-time flow measurement

• References

• 1 D'Ancona G, Karamanoukian HL, Ricci M, Schmid S, Bergsland J, Salerno TA. Graft revision after transit time flow measurement in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000; 17 (03) 287-293
• 2 Walpoth BH, Bosshard A, Genyk I. , et al. Transit-time flow measurement for detection of early graft failure during myocardial revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66 (03) 1097-1100
• 3 Becit N, Erkut B, Ceviz M, Unlu Y, Colak A, Kocak H. The impact of intraoperative transit time flow measurement on the results of on-pump coronary surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007; 32 (02) 313-318
• 4 Waseda K, Ako J, Hasegawa T. , et al. Intraoperative fluorescence imaging system for on-site assessment of off-pump coronary artery bypass graft. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009; 2 (05) 604-612
• 5 Canver CC, Dame NA. Ultrasonic assessment of internal thoracic artery graft flow in the revascularized heart. Ann Thorac Surg 1994; 58 (01) 135-138
• 6 Marcus JT, Smeenk HG, Kuijer JP, Van der Geest RJ, Heethaar RM, Van Rossum AC. Flow profiles in the left anterior descending and the right coronary artery assessed by MR velocity quantification: effects of through-plane and in-plane motion of the heart. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999; 23 (04) 567-576
• 7 Hirotani T, Kameda T, Shirota S, Nakao Y. An evaluation of the intraoperative transit time measurements of coronary bypass flow. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001; 19 (06) 848-852
• 8 Tokuda Y, Song MH, Oshima H, Usui A, Ueda Y. Predicting midterm coronary artery bypass graft failure by intraoperative transit time flow measurement. Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 86 (02) 532-536
• 9 Jokinen JJ, Werkkala K, Vainikka T, Peräkylä T, Simpanen J, Ihlberg L. Clinical value of intra-operative transit-time flow measurement for coronary artery bypass grafting: a prospective angiography-controlled study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011; 39 (06) 918-923
• 10 Leong DK, Ashok V, Nishkantha A, Shan YH, Sim EK. Transit-time flow measurement is essential in coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 79 (03) 854-857 , discussion 857–858
• 11 Kieser TM, Rose S, Kowalewski R, Belenkie I. Transit-time flow predicts outcomes in coronary artery bypass graft patients: a series of 1000 consecutive arterial grafts. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010; 38 (02) 155-162
• 12 Herman C, Sullivan JA, Buth K, Legare JF. Intraoperative graft flow measurements during coronary artery bypass surgery predict in-hospital outcomes. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2008; 7 (04) 582-585
• 13 Balacumaraswami L, Abu-Omar Y, Selvanayagam J, Pigott D, Taggart DP. The effects of on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on intraoperative graft flow in arterial and venous conduits defined by a flow/pressure ratio. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008; 135 (03) 533-539
• 14 Onorati F, Olivito S, Mastroroberto P. , et al. Perioperative patency of coronary artery bypass grafting is not influenced by off-pump technique. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 80 (06) 2132-2140
• 15 Di Giammarco G, Pano M, Cirmeni S, Pelini P, Vitolla G, Di Mauro M. Predictive value of intraoperative transit-time flow measurement for short-term graft patency in coronary surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 132 (03) 468-474
• 16 Takami Y, Ina H. Relation of intraoperative flow measurement with postoperative quantitative angiographic assessment of coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 72 (04) 1270-1274
• 17 Balacumaraswami L, Taggart DP. Digital tools to facilitate intraoperative coronary artery bypass graft patency assessment. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 16 (03) 266-271
• 18 Lopes RD, Mehta RH, Hafley GE. Relationship between vein graft failure and subsequent clinical outcomes after coronary artery bypass surgery. Project of Ex Vivo Vein Graft Engineering via Transfection IV (PREVENT IV) Investigators. Circulation 2012; 125: 749-756
• 19 Brevetti G, Giugliano G, Brevetti L, Hiatt WR. Inflammation in peripheral artery disease. Circulation 2010; 122: 1862-1875