J Knee Surg 2017; 30(09): 960-964
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1599251
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Comparison of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Isometry between Paired Femoral and Tibial Tunnels

E. Lyle Cain Jr.
1   American Sports Medicine Institute, Birmingham, Alabama
2   Andrews Sports Medicine and Orthopaedic Center, Birmingham, Alabama
,
Marcus D. Biggers
1   American Sports Medicine Institute, Birmingham, Alabama
,
David P. Beason
1   American Sports Medicine Institute, Birmingham, Alabama
,
Benton A. Emblom
1   American Sports Medicine Institute, Birmingham, Alabama
2   Andrews Sports Medicine and Orthopaedic Center, Birmingham, Alabama
,
Jeffrey R. Dugas
1   American Sports Medicine Institute, Birmingham, Alabama
2   Andrews Sports Medicine and Orthopaedic Center, Birmingham, Alabama
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

07 November 2016

14 January 2017

Publication Date:
10 March 2017 (online)

Abstract

Accurate tunnel placement is important for a successful anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Controversy exists concerning the preferred method of femoral tunnel preparation, with proponents of both medial portal and transtibial drilling techniques. Current ACL literature suggests that placement of the femoral ACL attachment site posterior or “low” in the ACL footprint leads to more anatomically correct ACL mechanics and better rotational control. There is limited literature focusing on ACL graft displacement through knee range of motion based on specific paired placement of femoral and tibial tunnels. Our purpose was to assess ACL isometry between multiple combinations of femoral and tibial tunnels. We hypothesized that placement of the graft at the posterior aspect of the ACL footprint on the femur would be significantly less isometric and lead to more graft displacement as compared with central or anterior placement. The ACL of matched pairs of cadaveric knees was arthroscopically debrided while leaving the soft tissue footprint on the femur and tibia intact. One knee from each pair underwent notchplasty. In all knees, three femoral and three tibial tunnels were created at the anterior, central, and posterior aspects of the ACL footprint. A suture was passed through each tunnel combination (nine potential pairs), and the change in isometry was measured throughout full knee range of motion. Placement of the femoral tunnel along the posterior aspect of the ACL footprint was less isometric compared with a central or anterior position in the femoral footprint. Placement of a posterior tibial tunnel also led to decreased isometry, but tibial tunnel placement affected isometry to a lesser extent than femoral tunnel placement. The combination of a posterior femoral and posterior tibial tunnel resulted in greater than 1 cm of graft excursion from full flexion to extension. Placement of ACL tunnels at anisometric sites may adversely affect the mechanical properties and behavior of the ACL graft, resulting in either graft laxity in flexion or overconstraint and loss of extension.

 
  • References

  • 1 Miller RH, Azar FM. Knee injuries. In: Canale ST, Beaty JH. , eds. Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics. 12th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2013: 2052-2212
  • 2 Niska JA, Petrigliano FA, McCallister DR. Anterior cruciate ligament injuries (including revision). In: Miller MD, Thompson SR. , eds. DeLee & Drez's Orthopaedic Sports Medicine: Principles and Practice. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2015: 1149-1163
  • 3 Sasaki N, Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E. , et al. The femoral insertion of the anterior cruciate ligament: discrepancy between macroscopic and histological observations. Arthroscopy 2012; 28 (08) 1135-1146
  • 4 Pearle AD, McAllister D, Howell SM. Rationale for strategic graft placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: I.D.E.A.L. femoral tunnel position. Am J Orthop 2015; 44 (06) 253-258
  • 5 Giron F, Cuomo P, Aglietti P, Bull AMJ, Amis AA. Femoral attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2006; 14 (03) 250-256
  • 6 Marchant BG, Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD, Fleckenstein C. Prevalence of nonanatomical graft placement in a series of failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38 (10) 1987-1996
  • 7 Diamantopoulos AP, Lorbach O, Paessler HH. Anterior cruciate ligament revision reconstruction: results in 107 patients. Am J Sports Med 2008; 36 (05) 851-860
  • 8 Loh JC, Fukuda Y, Tsuda E, Steadman RJ, Fu FH, Woo SLY. Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison between 11 o'clock and 10 o'clock femoral tunnel placement. 2002 Richard O'Connor Award paper. Arthroscopy 2003; 19 (03) 297-304
  • 9 Beynnon BD, Uh BS, Johnson RJ, Fleming BC, Renström PA, Nichols CE. The elongation behavior of the anterior cruciate ligament graft in vivo. A long-term follow-up study. Am J Sports Med 2001; 29 (02) 161-166
  • 10 O'Meara PM, O'Brien WR, Henning CE. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction stability with continuous passive motion. The role of isometric graft placement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992; (277) 201-209
  • 11 Amis AA, Jakob RP. Anterior cruciate ligament graft positioning, tensioning and twisting. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1998; 6 (Suppl. 01) S2-S12
  • 12 Hefzy MS, Grood ES, Noyes FR. Factors affecting the region of most isometric femoral attachments. Part II: the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 1989; 17 (02) 208-216
  • 13 Howell SM, Gittins ME, Gottlieb JE, Traina SM, Zoellner TM. The relationship between the angle of the tibial tunnel in the coronal plane and loss of flexion and anterior laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2001; 29 (05) 567-574
  • 14 Simmons R, Howell SM, Hull ML. Effect of the angle of the femoral and tibial tunnels in the coronal plane and incremental excision of the posterior cruciate ligament on tension of an anterior cruciate ligament graft: an in vitro study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85-A (06) 1018-1029
  • 15 Chouliaras V, Ristanis S, Moraiti C, Stergiou N, Georgoulis AD. Effectiveness of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with quadrupled hamstrings and bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts: an in vivo study comparing tibial internal-external rotation. Am J Sports Med 2007; 35 (02) 189-196
  • 16 Logan MC, Williams A, Lavelle J, Gedroyc W, Freeman M. Tibiofemoral kinematics following successful anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using dynamic multiple resonance imaging. Am J Sports Med 2004; 32 (04) 984-992
  • 17 Papannagari R, Gill TJ, Defrate LE, Moses JM, Petruska AJ, Li G. In vivo kinematics of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a clinical and functional evaluation. Am J Sports Med 2006; 34 (12) 2006-2012
  • 18 Tashman S, Collon D, Anderson K, Kolowich P, Anderst W. Abnormal rotational knee motion during running after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2004; 32 (04) 975-983
  • 19 Wallace MP, Hull ML, Howell SM. Can an isometer predict the tensile behavior of a double-looped hamstring graft during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?. J Orthop Res 1998; 16 (03) 386-393
  • 20 Rahr-Wagner L, Thillemann TM, Pedersen AB, Lind MC. Increased risk of revision after anteromedial compared with transtibial drilling of the femoral tunnel during primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results from the Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Register. Arthroscopy 2013; 29 (01) 98-105
  • 21 Clatworthy M. Transtibial versus transportal ACLR: results of a consecutive series of ACLR with hamstring autograft. Presented at Herodicus Annual Meeting, Lyon, France, June 3, 2015