Download PDF
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2017; 78(03): 250-254
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1597893
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Emergency Lumbar Disk Operation: How Safe Is it?

Shadi Al-Afif
,
Kerstin Schwabe
,
Mohamed Jabarin
,
Zafer Cinibulak
,
Joachim K. Krauss
Further Information

Publication History

10 October 2015

14 November 2016

Publication Date:
09 January 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background and Study Aims It was suggested that emergency operations could represent a risk factor for complications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether complication rates are higher in emergency lumbar disk operations compared with elective lumbar disk surgery.

Materials and Methods Patient data sets from 575 microscopic lumbar disk surgeries performed within a 5-year period were evaluated in a retrospective study design. There were 498 patients after excluding those who had surgery for recurrent disk herniation. Overall, 460 patients (92.4%) underwent elective surgery (nonemergency group), and 38 patients (7.6%) were operated on in an emergency setting (emergency group). The incidence of dural tears, the frequency of intra- and perioperative complications, the rate of recurrent disk herniation, and the length of hospital stay were evaluated.

Results No statistically significant differences between the two groups were found with regard to the incidence of dural tears (7.9% in the emergency group, 4.3% in the nonemergency group; p = 0.32), the rate of complications (2.6% in the emergency group, 2.8% in the nonemergency group; p = 0.95), the rate of recurrent disk herniation (8.9% versus 10.5%; p = 0.74), and the length of hospital stay (p = 0.22).

Conclusions Emergency lumbar disk surgery has a similar safety profile as elective surgery. Patients who present with acute or progressive neurologic deficits and need emergency surgery are not exposed to a higher risk of surgery.

Keywords

complications - dural tears - emergency lumbar disk operation - recurrent disk herniation
 

  • References

  • 1 Rompe JD, Eysel P, Zöllner J, Heine J. Intra- and postoperative risk analysis after lumbar intervertebral disk operation [in German]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1999; 137 (3) 201-205
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Wiese M, Krämer J, Bernsmann K, Ernst Willburger R. The related outcome and complication rate in primary lumbar microscopic disc surgery depending on the surgeon's experience: comparative studies. Spine J 2004; 4 (5) 550-556
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Jensen RL. Cauda equina syndrome as a postoperative complication of lumbar spine surgery. Neurosurg Focus 2004; 16 (6) e7
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Schüwer U, Roosen K. Complications in lumbar intervertebral disk operations [in German]. Neurochirurgia (Stuttg) 1988; 31 (Suppl. 01) 192-195
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Tay EC, Chacha PB. Midline prolapse of a lumbar intervertebral disc with compression of the cauda equina. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1979; 61 (1) 43-46
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Kostuik JP, Harrington I, Alexander D, Rand W, Evans D. Cauda equina syndrome and lumbar disc herniation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986; 68 (3) 386-391
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 O'Laoire SA, Crockard HA, Thomas DG. Prognosis for sphincter recovery after operation for cauda equina compression owing to lumbar disc prolapse. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1981; 282 (6279): 1852-1854
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Dinning TA, Schaeffer HR. Discogenic compression of the cauda equina: a surgical emergency. Aust N Z J Surg 1993; 63 (12) 927-934
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Nielsen B, de Nully M, Schmidt K, Hansen RI. A urodynamic study of cauda equina syndrome due to lumbar disc herniation. Urol Int 1980; 35 (3) 167-170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Ahn UM, Ahn NU, Buchowski JM, Garrett ES, Sieber AN, Kostuik JP. Cauda equina syndrome secondary to lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis of surgical outcomes. Spine 2000; 25 (12) 1515-1522
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD , et al. Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: four-year results for the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine 2008; 33 (25) 2789-2800
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Fourney DR, Dettori JR, Norvell DC, Dekutoski MB. Does minimal access tubular assisted spine surgery increase or decrease complications in spinal decompression or fusion?. Spine 2010; 35 (9, Suppl): S57-S65
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Barrios C, Ahmed M, Arrotegui JI, Björnsson A. Clinical factors predicting outcome after surgery for herniated lumbar disc: an epidemiological multivariate analysis. J Spinal Disord 1990; 3 (3) 205-209
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Kotilainen E, Valtonen S, Carlson CA. Microsurgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation: follow-up of 237 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1993; 120 (3–4): 143-149
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Wera GD, Dean CL, Ahn UM , et al. Reherniation and failure after lumbar discectomy: a comparison of fragment excision alone versus subtotal discectomy. J Spinal Disord Tech 2008; 21 (5) 316-319
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Bärlocher CB, Krauss JK, Seiler RW. Central lumbar disc herniation. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2000; 142 (12) 1369-1374 ; discussion 1374–1375
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Junge A, Dvorak J, Ahrens S. Predictors of bad and good outcomes of lumbar disc surgery. A prospective clinical study with recommendations for screening to avoid bad outcomes. Spine 1995; 20 (4) 460-468
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Neumayer L, Hosokawa P, Itani K, El-Tamer M, Henderson WG, Khuri SF. Multivariable predictors of postoperative surgical site infection after general and vascular surgery: results from the patient safety in surgery study. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 204 (6) 1178-1187
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Sjo OH, Larsen S, Lunde OC, Nesbakken A. Short term outcome after emergency and elective surgery for colon cancer. Colorectal Dis 2009; 11 (7) 733-739
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Attenello FJ, Christian E, Wen T , et al. Reevaluating the weekend effect on patients with hydrocephalus undergoing operative shunt intervention. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2015; 17 (February) 1-7
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Desai V, Gonda D, Ryan SL , et al. The effect of weekend and after-hours surgery on morbidity and mortality rates in pediatric neurosurgery patients. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2015; 16 (6) 726-731
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Papadoulas S, Konstantinou D, Kourea HP, Kritikos N, Haftouras N, Tsolakis JA. Vascular injury complicating lumbar disc surgery. A systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2002; 24 (3) 189-195
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Shih P-Y, Lau H-P, Jeng C-S, Hung M-H, Chan K-C, Cheng Y-J. Iatrogenic left internal iliac artery perforation during lumbar discectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan 2009; 47 (4) 196-199
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Bartels RH, de Vries J. Hemi-cauda equina syndrome from herniated lumbar disc: a neurosurgical emergency?. Can J Neurol Sci 1996; 23 (4) 296-299
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Choudhury AR, Taylor JC. Cauda equina syndrome in lumbar disc disease. Acta Orthop Scand 1980; 51 (3) 493-499 h
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Cummins J, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD , et al. Descriptive epidemiology and prior healthcare utilization of patients in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial's (SPORT) three observational cohorts: disc herniation, spinal stenosis, and degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine 2006; 31 (7) 806-814
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Shamim MS, Parekh MA, Bari ME, Enam SA, Khursheed F. Microdiscectomy for lumbosacral disc herniation and frequency of failed disc surgery. World Neurosurg 2010; 74 (6) 611-616
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Desai A, Bekelis K, Ball PA , et al. Spine patient outcomes research trial: do outcomes vary across centers for surgery for lumbar disc herniation?. Neurosurgery 2012; 71 (4) 833-842
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Cammisa Jr FP, Girardi FP, Sangani PK, Parvataneni HK, Cadag S, Sandhu HS. Incidental durotomy in spine surgery. Spine 2000; 25 (20) 2663-2667
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Desai A, Ball PA, Bekelis K , et al. SPORT: does incidental durotomy affect long-term outcomes in cases of spinal stenosis?. Neurosurgery 2011; 69 (1) 38-44 ; discussion 44
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Swartz KR, Trost GR. Recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Neurosurg Focus 2003; 15 (3) E10
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Suk KS, Lee HM, Moon SH, Kim NH. Recurrent lumbar disc herniation: results of operative management. Spine 2001; 26 (6) 672-676
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 McGirt MJ, Ambrossi GLG, Datoo G , et al. Recurrent disc herniation and long-term back pain after primary lumbar discectomy: review of outcomes reported for limited versus aggressive disc removal. Neurosurgery 2009; 64 (2) 338-344 ; discussion 344–345
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Moliterno JA, Knopman J, Parikh K , et al. Results and risk factors for recurrence following single-level tubular lumbar microdiscectomy. J Neurosurg Spine 2010; 12 (6) 680-686
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Barth M, Diepers M, Weiss C, Thomé C. Two-year outcome after lumbar microdiscectomy versus microscopic sequestrectomy: part 2: radiographic evaluation and correlation with clinical outcome. Spine 2008; 33 (3) 273-279
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Carragee EJ, Han MY, Suen PW, Kim D. Clinical outcomes after lumbar discectomy for sciatica: the effects of fragment type and anular competence. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85-A (1) 102-108
    PubMedGoogle Scholar