Analysis of Flap Weight and Postoperative Complications Based on Flap Weight in Patients Undergoing Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction

Abstract

Background Higher body mass index (BMI) has been shown to increase postoperative complications in autologous breast reconstruction. However, the correlation with flap weight is unknown. Here, we explore the relationship of flap weights and complication rates in patients undergoing microvascular breast reconstruction.

Methods Retrospective chart review identified all patients undergoing microvascular breast reconstruction with abdominally based flaps at a single institution between November 2007 and April 2013. Breasts with documented flap weight and 1-year follow-up were included. Patients undergoing stacked deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps were excluded. Breasts were divided into quartiles based on flap weight and examined by demographics, surgical characteristics, complications, and revisions.

Results A total of 130 patients undergoing 225 flaps were identified. Patients had a mean age of 50.4 years, mean BMI of 27.1 kg/m², and mean flap weight of 638.4 g (range: 70–1640 g). Flap weight and BMI were directly correlated. Flaps were divided into weight-based quartiles: first (70–396 g), second (397–615 g), third (616–870 g), and fourth (871–1640 g). There were no associations between flap weight and incidences of venous thrombosis, arterial thrombosis, hematoma, flap loss, fat necrosis, or donor site hernia. However, increased flap weight was associated with increased rate of donor site wound healing problems in both univariate and multivariate analysis.

Conclusions Increased flap weight is not associated with added flap complications among patients undergoing microvascular breast reconstruction, however, patients with flaps of 667.5 g or more are more likely to have donor site healing problems. The success and evidence contrary to previous studies may be attributed to surgeon intraoperative flap choice.

Keywords

microsurgical breast reconstruction - flap weight - postoperative complications

• References

• 1 Andree C, Langer S, Seidenstuecker K , et al. A single center prospective study of bilateral breast reconstruction with free abdominal flaps: a critical analyses of 144 patients. Med Sci Monit 2013; 19: 467-474
• 2 Chang DW, Wang B, Robb GL , et al. Effect of obesity on flap and donor-site complications in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (5) 1640-1648
• 3 Fischer JP, Nelson JA, Kovach SJ, Serletti JM, Wu LC, Kanchwala S. Impact of obesity on outcomes in breast reconstruction: analysis of 15,937 patients from the ACS-NSQIP datasets. J Am Coll Surg 2013; 217 (4) 656-664
• 4 Fischer JP, Nelson JA, Sieber B , et al. Free tissue transfer in the obese patient: an outcome and cost analysis in 1258 consecutive abdominally based reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131 (5) 681e-692e
• 5 Jandali S, Nelson JA, Sonnad SS , et al. Breast reconstruction with free tissue transfer from the abdomen in the morbidly obese. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (6) 2206-2213
• 6 Kubo T, Miki A, Osaki Y, Onoda M. Simple volume estimation of the latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap in Asian breast reconstruction. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2014; 48 (2) 148-151
• 7 Hanwright PJ, Davila AA, Hirsch EM , et al. The differential effect of BMI on prosthetic versus autogenous breast reconstruction: a multivariate analysis of 12,986 patients. Breast 2013; 22 (5) 938-945
• 8 Nahabedian MY, Momen B, Galdino G, Manson PN. Breast reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: patient selection, choice of flap, and outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110 (2) 466-475 , discussion 476–477
• 9 Scheflan M, Kalisman M. Complications of breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 1984; 11 (2) 343-350
• 10 Booi DI, Debats IB, Boeckx WD, van der Hulst RR. Risk factors and blood flow in the free transverse rectus abdominis (TRAM) flap: smoking and high flap weight impair the free TRAM flap microcirculation. Ann Plast Surg 2007; 59 (4) 364-371
• 11 Bozikov K, Arnez T, Hertl K, Arnez ZM. Fat necrosis in free DIEAP flaps: incidence, risk, and predictor factors. Ann Plast Surg 2009; 63 (2) 138-142
• 12 Momeni A, Ahdoot MA, Kim RY, Leroux E, Galaiya DJ, Lee GK. Should we continue to consider obesity a relative contraindication for autologous microsurgical breast reconstruction?. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65 (4) 420-425
• 13 Wu LC, Iteld L, Song DH. Supercharging the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap: breast reconstruction for the overweight and obese population. Ann Plast Surg 2008; 60 (6) 609-613
• 14 Krishnan NM, Purnell C, Nahabedian MY , et al. The cost effectiveness of the DIEP flap relative to the muscle-sparing TRAM flap in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (4) 948-958
• 15 Chen CM, Halvorson EG, Disa JJ , et al. Immediate postoperative complications in DIEP versus free/muscle-sparing TRAM flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (6) 1477-1482
• 16 Butler PD, Wu LC. Abdominal perforator vs. muscle sparing flaps for breast reconstruction. Gland Surg 2015; 4 (3) 212-221
• 17 Nelson JA, Guo Y, Sonnad SS , et al. A Comparison between DIEP and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps in breast reconstruction: a single surgeon's recent experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (5) 1428-1435
• 18 Salgarello M, Tambasco D, Farallo E. DIEP flap donor site versus elective abdominoplasty short-term complication rates: a meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2012; 36 (2) 363-369
• 19 Mirzabeigi MN, Wilson AJ, Fischer JP , et al. Predicting and managing donor-site wound complications in abdominally based free flap breast reconstruction: improved outcomes with early reoperative closure. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (1) 14-23
• 20 Weichman KE, Broer PN, Tanna N , et al. The role of autologous fat grafting in secondary microsurgical breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2013; 71 (1) 24-30