Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1593972
Delivery Outcomes after Term Induction of Labor in Small-for-Gestational Age Fetuses
Publication History
12 June 2016
13 October 2016
Publication Date:
04 November 2016 (online)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6fab5/6fab582e2b6c002ab7029a6e59d765288094e4c0" alt=""
Abstract
Objective The objective of this study was to estimate the delivery outcomes after induction of labor (IOL) at term in patients with small-for-gestational age (SGA) fetuses.
Study Design A secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study of all term, singleton deliveries from 2010 to 2014. Patients who underwent an IOL for any indication were included. Delivery outcomes were compared between patients with and without SGA fetuses (defined as birth weight < 10th percentile for gestational age). Analysis was stratified by parity. Indication for cesarean was compared between the two groups for those who did not achieve vaginal delivery. Logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders.
Results Of 3,787 patients who underwent an IOL, 644 patients had SGA fetuses and 3,143 were included in the non-SGA group. There was no significant difference in rate of successful vaginal delivery for patients with and without SGA fetuses (77.2 vs. 72.0% [adjusted odds ratio: 1.22, 95% confidence interval 1.00–1.50]). Of the patients who were delivered by cesarean, women with SGA fetuses were more likely to undergo cesarean for nonreassuring fetal status and less likely for arrest disorders than women without an SGA fetus.
Conclusion Term patients undergoing IOL with SGA fetuses are as likely to achieve a vaginal delivery as patients with non-SGA fetuses.
Note
This study was presented in poster format at the 36th annual meeting of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Atlanta, GA, February 1–6, 2016.
-
References
- 1 McIntire DD, Bloom SL, Casey BM, Leveno KJ. Birth weight in relation to morbidity and mortality among newborn infants. N Engl J Med 1999; 340 (16) 1234-1238
- 2 Visentin S, Londero AP, Grumolato F , et al. Timing of delivery and neonatal outcomes for small-for-gestational-age fetuses. J Ultrasound Med 2014; 33 (10) 1721-1728
- 3 Doctor BA, O'Riordan MA, Kirchner HL, Shah D, Hack M. Perinatal correlates and neonatal outcomes of small for gestational age infants born at term gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185 (3) 652-659
- 4 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin no. 134: fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 121 (5) 1122-1133
- 5 Chauhan SP, Gupta LM, Hendrix NW, Berghella V ; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Intrauterine growth restriction: comparison of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists practice bulletin with other national guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200 (4) 409.e1-409 .e6
- 6 Ben-Haroush A, Yogev Y, Glickman H, Kaplan B, Hod M, Bar J. Mode of delivery in pregnancies with suspected fetal growth restriction following induction of labor with vaginal prostaglandin E2. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004; 83 (1) 52-57
- 7 Lee HC, Gould JB. Survival rates and mode of delivery for vertex preterm neonates according to small- or appropriate-for-gestational-age status. Pediatrics 2006; 118 (6) e1836-e1844
- 8 Bernstein IM, Horbar JD, Badger GJ, Ohlsson A, Golan A ; The Vermont Oxford Network. Morbidity and mortality among very-low-birth-weight neonates with intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182 (1 Pt 1): 198-206
- 9 Savchev S, Figueras F, Cruz-Martinez R, Illa M, Botet F, Gratacos E. Estimated weight centile as a predictor of perinatal outcome in small-for-gestational-age pregnancies with normal fetal and maternal Doppler indices. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39 (3) 299-303
- 10 Fratelli N, Valcamonico A, Prefumo F, Pagani G, Guarneri T, Frusca T. Effects of antenatal recognition and follow-up on perinatal outcomes in small-for-gestational age infants delivered after 36 weeks. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013; 92 (2) 223-229