Arquivos Brasileiros de Neurocirurgia: Brazilian Neurosurgery 2016; 35(04): 279-284
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1593957
Original Article | Artigo Original
Thieme Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Analysis of Learning Curves for Transpedicular Puncture

Análise da curva de aprendizado para punção transpedicular
João de Deus Costa Alves
1   Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
,
José Roberto Falco Fonseca
1   Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
,
Darcio Roberto Nalli
1   Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
,
Nitamar Abdala
1   Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

23 February 2016

13 October 2016

Publication Date:
21 November 2016 (online)

Abstract

Objective The authors propose the analysis of quantitative and qualitative learning curves of transpedicular puncture in a manikin-type training simulator model for transpedicular puncture (SMTP)

Methods Six students (S1 to S6) were selected to perform the puncture training under radiological control. Quantitative parameters such as the procedure time (total time spent in performing each procedure) and fluoroscopy time (fluoroscopy usage time for each punch) were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test. For the qualitative evaluation, the punctures were categorized into type AB (adequate) or CD (inadequate) according to the path and positioning of the needle. Qualitative data were analyzed by Fisher's exact test.

Results The curves of the examination times and fluoroscopy decreased steadily as expected, especially for the trainee S3. In addition, there was a predominance of punctures AB of the third subsequent session; however, this result was statistically significant for the S1 and S2 trainees.

Conclusion The learning curves indicate that qualitative performance improves as students become more familiar with the process.

Resumo

Objetivo Os autores propõem a análise de curvas de aprendizado quantitativa e qualitativa para punção transpedicular em modelo simulador tipo manequim (SMTP).

Método Foram selecionados seis estudantes (S1 a S6) para treinamento de punção transpedicular sob controle radiológico. Parâmetros quantitativos como tempo de procedimento (tempo total gasto na performance de cada punção) e tempo de fluoroscopia (tempo de utilização fluoroscopia em cada punção) foram analisados através do teste Mann-Whitney. Análise qualitativa categorizada em punção AB (adequada) ou CD (inadequada) de acordo com o trajeto e posicionamento da agulha. Os dados qualitativos foram analisados através do teste de Fisher.

Resultado As curvas dos tempos de exame e fluoroscopia diminuíram de forma constante conforme esperado, especialmente para o estagiário S3. Adicionalmente, houve predominância de punções AB na terceira sessão; entretanto, este resultado foi estatisticamente significante para os estagiários S1 e S2.

Conclusão As curvas de aprendizado qualitativas indicaram melhora da performance a medida que o processo torna-se mais familiar aos estudantes.

 
  • References

  • 1 Higashida RT, Hopkins LN, Berenstein A, Halbach VV, Kerber C. Program requirements for residency/fellowship education in neuroendovascular surgery/interventional neuroradiology: a special report on graduate medical education. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21 (6) 1153-1159
  • 2 Friedman DP, Pramanik BK. Fellowship and practice trends in neuroradiology training programs in the United States. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22 (9) 1650-1653
  • 3 Higashida RT. Evolution of a new multidisciplinary subspecialty: interventional neuroradiology/neuroendovascular surgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21 (6) 1151-1152
  • 4 Schijven MP, Jakimowicz J. The learning curve on the Xitact LS 500 laparoscopy simulator: profiles of performance. Surg Endosc 2004; 18 (1) 121-127
  • 5 Hands-on workshops. European Congress of Radiology. 2004 . Postgraduate Educational Program [on line]. Available at: http://www.diagnostico.com.ar/diagnostico/dia130/d-euc3130.asp [accessed on 24/09/2004].
  • 6 Abdala N, Oliveira RAS, Alves JDC, Spindola T. Manikin-type training simulator model for transpedicular puncture in percutaneous vertebroplasty. Radiol Bras 2007; 40 (4) 231-234
  • 7 Kneebone R. Simulation in surgical training: educational issues and practical implications. Med Educ 2003; 37 (3) 267-277
  • 8 Newton PO, Shea KG, Granlund KF. Defining the pediatric spinal thoracoscopy learning curve: sixty-five consecutive cases. Spine 2000; 25 (8) 1028-1035
  • 9 Schauer P, Ikramuddin S, Hamad G, Gourash W. The learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is 100 cases. Surg Endosc 2003; 17 (2) 212-215
  • 10 Singh V, Gress DR, Higashida RT, Dowd CF, Halbach VV, Johnston SC. The learning curve for coil embolization of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002; 23 (5) 768-771
  • 11 Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M , et al. Learning curve of video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy and extensive lymphadenectomy for squamous cell cancer of the thoracic esophagus and results. Surg Endosc 2003; 17 (3) 515-519
  • 12 Uribe JI, Ralph Jr WM, Glaser AY, Fried MP. Learning curves, acquisition, and retention of skills trained with the endoscopic sinus surgery simulator. Am J Rhinol 2004; 18 (2) 87-92
  • 13 Hernandez JD, Bann SD, Munz Y , et al. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the learning curve of a simulated surgical task on the da Vinci system. Surg Endosc 2004; 18 (3) 372-378
  • 14 Liberman L, Benton CL, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, LaTrenta LR, Morris EA. Learning curve for stereotactic breast biopsy: how many cases are enough?. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176 (3) 721-727