Download PDF
Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2017; 30(01): 063-075
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1593425
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Functional Disorders: Rectocele

W. Conan Mustain
1   Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
22 December 2016 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Rectoceles are a very common finding in patients, and symptoms most commonly include pelvic pain, pressure, or difficulty with passing stool. However, there are often other associated pelvic floor disorders that accompany rectoceles, making the clinical significance of it in an individual patient often hard to determine. When evaluating a patient with a rectocele, a thorough history and physical exam must be conducted to help delineate other causes of these symptoms. Treatment consists of addressing other defecatory disorders through various methods, with surgery reserved for select cases in which obstructed defecation is well documented.

Keywords

rectocele - pelvic floor - posterior compartment - obstructed defecation syndrome
 

  • References

  • 1 Lefevre R, Davila GW. Functional disorders: rectocele. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2008; 21 (2) 129-137
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Porter WE, Summitt RL. The Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management of Rectoceles. Global Library of Women's Medicine; 2008
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE, Somers S, Stevenson GW. Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications. Gut 1989; 30 (12) 1737-1749
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Dietz HP, Clarke B. Prevalence of rectocele in young nulliparous women. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2005; 45 (5) 391-394
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89 (4) 501-506
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Van Laarhoven CJ, Kamm MA, Bartram CI, Halligan S, Hawley PR, Phillips RK. Relationship between anatomic and symptomatic long-term results after rectocele repair for impaired defecation. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42 (2) 204-210 , discussion 210–211
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Murthy VK, Orkin BA, Smith LE, Glassman LM. Excellent outcome using selective criteria for rectocele repair. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39 (4) 374-378
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Hall GM, Shanmugan S, Nobel T , et al. Symptomatic rectocele: what are the indications for repair?. Am J Surg 2014; 207 (3) 375-379 , discussion 378–379
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Hicks CW, Weinstein M, Wakamatsu M, Savitt L, Pulliam S, Bordeianou L. In patients with rectoceles and obstructed defecation syndrome, surgery should be the option of last resort. Surgery 2014; 155 (4) 659-667
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Parks AG, Porter NH, Melzak J. Experimental study of the reflex mechanism controlling the muscle of the pelvic floor. Dis Colon Rectum 1962; 5: 407-414
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 DeLancey JO. The anatomy of the pelvic floor. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1994; 6 (4) 313-316
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Strohbehn K. Normal pelvic floor anatomy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1998; 25 (4) 683-705
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 DeLancey JO. Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 166 (6, Pt 1): 1717-1724 , discussion 1724–1728
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Leffler KS, Thompson JR, Cundiff GW, Buller JL, Burrows LJ, Schön Ybarra MA. Attachment of the rectovaginal septum to the pelvic sidewall. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185 (1) 41-43
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 DeLancey JO. Structural anatomy of the posterior pelvic compartment as it relates to rectocele. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180 (4) 815-823
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Kleeman SD, Westermann C, Karram MM. Rectoceles and the anatomy of the posteriorvaginal wall: revisited. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193 (6) 2050-2055
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Ricci JV, Lisa JR , et al. The relationship of the vagina to adjacent organs in reconstructive surgery; a histologic study. Am J Surg 1947; 74 (4) 387-410
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Goff B. An histological study of the perivaginal fascia in a nullipara. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1931; 52: 32-42
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Uhlenhuth E, Wolfe WM , et al. The rectogenital septum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1948; 86 (2) 148-163
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Milley PS, Nichols DH. A correlative investigation of the human rectovaginal septum. Anat Rec 1969; 163 (3) 443-451
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Richardson AC. The anatomic defects in rectocele and enterocele. J Pelvic Surg 1995; 1 (4) 214-221
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Richardson AC. The rectovaginal septum revisited: its relationship to rectocele and its importance in rectocele repair. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1993; 36 (4) 976-983
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Farrell SA, Dempsey T, Geldenhuys L. Histologic examination of “fascia” used in colporrhaphy. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98 (5, Pt 1): 794-798
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Weber AM, Walters MD. Anterior vaginal prolapse: review of anatomy and techniques of surgical repair. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89 (2) 311-318
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Cundiff GW, Fenner D. Evaluation and treatment of women with rectocele: focus on associated defecatory and sexual dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104 (6) 1403-1421
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, Aragaki A, Barnabei V, McTiernan A. Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women's Health Initiative: gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186 (6) 1160-1166
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Röckner G, Jonasson A, Olund A. The effect of mediolateral episiotomy at delivery on pelvic floor muscle strength evaluated with vaginal cones. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1991; 70 (1) 51-54
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Allen RE, Hosker GL, Smith AR, Warrell DW. Pelvic floor damage and childbirth: a neurophysiological study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97 (9) 770-779
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Handa VL, Harris TA, Ostergard DR. Protecting the pelvic floor: obstetric management to prevent incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 88 (3) 470-478
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 DeLancey JO. Anatomy and biomechanics of genital prolapse. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1993; 36 (4) 897-909
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Luo J, Larson KA, Fenner DE, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JO. Posterior vaginal prolapse shape and position changes at maximal Valsalva seen in 3-D MRI-based models. Int Urogynecol J 2012; 23 (9) 1301-1306
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Higgins PD, Johanson JF. Epidemiology of constipation in North America: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99 (4) 750-759
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Suares NC, Ford AC. Prevalence of, and risk factors for, chronic idiopathic constipation in the community: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106 (9) 1582-1591 , quiz 1581, 1592
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Drossman DA. The functional gastrointestinal disorders and the Rome III process. Gastroenterology 2006; 130 (5) 1377-1390
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 35 Longstreth GF, Thompson WG, Chey WD, Houghton LA, Mearin F, Spiller RC. Functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology 2006; 130 (5) 1480-1491
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 36 Bharucha AE, Pemberton JH, Locke III GR. American Gastroenterological Association technical review on constipation. Gastroenterology 2013; 144 (1) 218-238
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Altomare DF, Spazzafumo L, Rinaldi M, Dodi G, Ghiselli R, Piloni V. Set-up and statistical validation of a new scoring system for obstructed defaecation syndrome. Colorectal Dis 2008; 10 (1) 84-88
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Rotholtz NA, Efron JE, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD. Anal manometric predictors of significant rectocele in constipated patients. Tech Coloproctol 2002; 6 (2) 73-76 , discussion 76–77
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Johansson C, Nilsson BY, Holmström B, Dolk A, Mellgren A. Association between rectocele and paradoxical sphincter response. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35 (5) 503-509
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Hicks CW, Weinstein M, Wakamatsu M, Pulliam S, Savitt L, Bordeianou L. Are rectoceles the cause or the result of obstructed defaecation syndrome? A prospective anorectal physiology study. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15 (8) 993-999
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Burrows LJ, Meyn LA, Walters MD, Weber AM. Pelvic symptoms in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104 (5, Pt 1): 982-988
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Fialkow MF, Gardella C, Melville J, Lentz GM, Fenner DE. Posterior vaginal wall defects and their relation to measures of pelvic floor neuromuscular function and posterior compartment symptoms. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187 (6) 1443-1448 , discussion 1448–1449
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Bradley CS, Brown MB, Cundiff GW , et al; Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Bowel symptoms in women planning surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195 (6) 1814-1819
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Altman D, López A, Kierkegaard J , et al. Assessment of posterior vaginal wall prolapse: comparison of physical findings to cystodefecoperitoneography. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2005; 16 (2) 96-103 , discussion 103
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Halligan S, Bartram CI. Is barium trapping in rectoceles significant?. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38 (7) 764-768
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Ting KH, Mangel E, Eibl-Eibesfeldt B, Müller-Lissner SA. Is the volume retained after defecation a valuable parameter at defecography?. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35 (8) 762-767
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Carter D, Gabel MB. Rectocele—does the size matter?. Int J Colorectal Dis 2012; 27 (7) 975-980
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Pescatori M, Spyrou M, Pulvirenti d'Urso A. A prospective evaluation of occult disorders in obstructed defecation using the ‘iceberg diagram’. Colorectal Dis 2007; 9 (5) 452-456
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 49 Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, Reissman P, Wexner SD. A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39 (6) 681-685
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 50 Varma MG, Wang JY, Berian JR, Patterson TR, McCrea GL, Hart SL. The constipation severity instrument: a validated measure. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51 (2) 162-172
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 51 Wang JY, Hart SL, Lee J, Berian JR, McCrea GL, Varma MG. A valid and reliable measure of constipation-related quality of life. Dis Colon Rectum 2009; 52 (8) 1434-1442
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 52 Baden WF, Walker TA. Genesis of the vaginal profile: a correlated classification of vaginal relaxation. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1972; 15 (4) 1048-1054
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 53 Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K , et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175 (1) 10-17
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 54 Bharucha AE, Dorn SD, Lembo A, Pressman A ; American Gastroenterological Association. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on constipation. Gastroenterology 2013; 144 (1) 211-217
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 55 Karlbom U, Graf W, Nilsson S, Påhlman L. Does surgical repair of a rectocele improve rectal emptying?. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39 (11) 1296-1302
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 56 van Dam JH, Ginai AZ, Gosselink MJ , et al. Role of defecography in predicting clinical outcome of rectocele repair. Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40 (2) 201-207
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 57 Gufler H, Ohde A, Grau G, Grossmann A. Colpocystoproctography in the upright and supine positions correlated with dynamic MRI of the pelvic floor. Eur J Radiol 2004; 51 (1) 41-47
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 58 Lienemann A, Anthuber C, Baron A, Kohz P, Reiser M. Dynamic MR colpocystorectography assessing pelvic-floor descent. Eur Radiol 1997; 7 (8) 1309-1317
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 59 Pannu HK, Scatarige JC, Eng J. Comparison of supine magnetic resonance imaging with and without rectal contrast to fluoroscopic cystocolpoproctography for the diagnosis of pelvic organ prolapse. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2009; 33 (1) 125-130
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 60 Gufler H, Laubenberger J, DeGregorio G, Dohnicht S, Langer M. Pelvic floor descent: dynamic MR imaging using a half-Fourier RARE sequence. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 9 (3) 378-383
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 61 Lalwani N, Moshiri M, Lee JH, Bhargava P, Dighe MK. Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic floor dysfunction. Radiol Clin North Am 2013; 51 (6) 1127-1139
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 62 Davila GW, Ghoniem GM, Kapoor DS, Contreras-Ortiz O. Pelvic floor dysfunction management practice patterns: a survey of members of the International Urogynecological Association. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2002; 13 (5) 319-325
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 63 Devroede G. Early life abuses in the past history of patients with gastrointestinal tract and pelvic floor dysfunctions. Prog Brain Res 2000; 122: 131-155
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 64 Rao SS, Seaton K, Miller M , et al. Randomized controlled trial of biofeedback, sham feedback, and standard therapy for dyssynergic defecation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 5 (3) 331-338
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 65 Chiarioni G, Salandini L, Whitehead WE. Biofeedback benefits only patients with outlet dysfunction, not patients with isolated slow transit constipation. Gastroenterology 2005; 129 (1) 86-97
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 66 Mimura T, Roy AJ, Storrie JB, Kamm MA. Treatment of impaired defecation associated with rectocele by behavioral retraining (biofeedback). Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43 (9) 1267-1272
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 67 Lau CW, Heymen S, Alabaz O, Iroatulam AJ, Wexner SD. Prognostic significance of rectocele, intussusception, and abnormal perineal descent in biofeedback treatment for constipated patients with paradoxical puborectalis contraction. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43 (4) 478-482
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 68 Lone F, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Karamalis G. A 5-year prospective study of vaginal pessary use for pelvic organ prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2011; 114 (1) 56-59
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 69 Yamada T, Matsubara S. Rectocoele, but not cystocoele, may predict unsuccessful pessary fitting. J Obstet Gynaecol 2011; 31 (5) 441-442
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 70 Sand PK, Koduri S, Lobel RW , et al. Prospective randomized trial of polyglactin 910 mesh to prevent recurrence of cystoceles and rectoceles. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 184 (7) 1357-1362 , discussion 1362–1364
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 71 Sung VW, Rardin CR, Raker CA, Lasala CA, Myers DL. Porcine subintestinal submucosal graft augmentation for rectocele repair: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 119 (1) 125-133
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 72 Paraiso MF, Barber MD, Muir TW, Walters MD. Rectocele repair: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques including graft augmentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195 (6) 1762-1771
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 73 Marks MM. The rectal side of the rectocele. Dis Colon Rectum 1967; 10 (5) 387-388
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 74 Brusciano L, Limongelli P, Tolone S , et al. Technical aspect of stapled transanal rectal resection. From PPH-01 to Contour to both: an optional combined approach to treat obstructed defecation?. Dis Colon Rectum 2015; 58 (8) 817-820
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 75 Gagliardi G, Pescatori M, Altomare DF , et al; Italian Society of Colo-Rectal Surgery (SICCR). Results, outcome predictors, and complications after stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51 (2) 186-195 , discussion 195
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 76 Pescatori M, Gagliardi G. Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures. Tech Coloproctol 2008; 12 (1) 7-19
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 77 Naldini G. Serious unconventional complications of surgery with stapler for haemorrhoidal prolapse and obstructed defaecation because of rectocoele and rectal intussusception. Colorectal Dis 2011; 13 (3) 323-327
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 78 Martellucci J, Talento P, Carriero A. Early complications after stapled transanal rectal resection performed using the Contour® Transtar™ device. Colorectal Dis 2011; 13 (12) 1428-1431
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 79 Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Roviaro G. What is the benefit of a new stapler device in the surgical treatment of obstructed defecation? Three-year outcomes from a randomized controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54 (1) 77-84
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 80 Asteria CR, Bellarosa S, Chiarioni G , et al. Long-term follow-up of after STARR for obstructed defecation. Tech Coloproctol 2014; 18 (2) 213-214
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 81 Ohazuruike NL, Martellucci J, Menconi C, Panicucci S, Toniolo G, Naldini G. Short-term results after STARR versus internal Delorme for obstructed defecation: a non-randomized prospective study. Updates Surg 2014; 66 (2) 151-156
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 82 Panicucci S, Martellucci J, Menconi C, Toniolo G, Naldini G. Correlation between outcome and instrumental findings after stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation syndrome. Surg Innov 2014; 21 (5) 469-475
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 83 Ribaric G, D'Hoore A, Schiffhorst G, Hempel E ; TRANSTAR Registry Study Group. STARR with CONTOUR® TRANSTAR™ device for obstructed defecation syndrome: one-year real-world outcomes of the European TRANSTAR registry. Int J Colorectal Dis 2014; 29 (5) 611-622
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 84 Bock S, Wolff K, Marti L, Schmied BM, Hetzer FH. Long-term outcome after transanal rectal resection in patients with obstructed defecation syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56 (2) 246-252
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 85 Cundiff GW, Harris RL, Coates K, Low VH, Bump RC, Addison WA. Abdominal sacral colpoperineopexy: a new approach for correction of posterior compartment defects and perineal descent associated with vaginal vault prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177 (6) 1345-1353 , discussion 1353–1355
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 86 Grimes CL, Quiroz LH, Gutman RE, Shippey S, Cundiff GW, Handa VL. Long-term impact of abdominal sacral colpoperineopexy on symptoms of obstructed defecation. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2010; 16 (4) 234-237
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 87 D'Hoore A, Cadoni R, Penninckx F. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 2004; 91 (11) 1500-1505
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 88 Wong MT, Abet E, Rigaud J, Frampas E, Lehur PA, Meurette G. Minimally invasive ventral mesh rectopexy for complex rectocoele: impact on anorectal and sexual function. Colorectal Dis 2011; 13 (10) e320-e326
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 89 Formijne Jonkers HA, Poierrie N, Draaisma WA, Broeders IA, Consten EC. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and symptomatic rectocele: an analysis of 245 consecutive patients. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15 (6) 695-699
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 90 Kahn MA, Stanton SL. Posterior colporrhaphy: its effects on bowel and sexual function. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104 (1) 82-86
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 91 Abramov Y, Gandhi S, Goldberg RP, Botros SM, Kwon C, Sand PK. Site-specific rectocele repair compared with standard posterior colporrhaphy. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105 (2) 314-318
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 92 Karram M, Maher C. Surgery for posterior vaginal wall prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 2013; 24 (11) 1835-1841
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 93 Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Schmid C. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 4 (4) CD004014
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar