J Knee Surg 2017; 30(04): 359-363
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1592150
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Utilization of Osseous Landmarks for Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Femoral Tunnel Placement

Flynn Andrew Rowan
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona
,
Tyler Marshall
2   Alabama Orthopedic, Spine & Sports Medicine Associates, Birmingham, Alabama
,
Michael R. Gombosh
3   South Florida International Orthopaedics, Miami, Florida
,
Lutul Dashaun Farrow
4   Cleveland Clinic Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland, Ohio
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

19 January 2016

25 July 2016

Publication Date:
14 September 2016 (online)

Abstract

Accurate placement of the femoral tunnel is critical for long-term clinical success following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the accuracy of femoral tunnel placement when referencing osseous landmarks during ACL reconstruction. We hypothesize that referencing osseous landmarks during ACL reconstruction consistently results in anatomic placement of the ACL femoral tunnel. This study was a retrospective case series. We reviewed 83 consecutive ACL reconstructions performed by a single surgeon. The lateral intercondylar ridge and lateral bifurcate ridge were referenced intraoperatively for anatomic placement of the ACL femoral tunnel during single-bundle reconstruction. Using these landmarks, the femoral tunnel was placed in the center of the anteromedial bundle footprint on the lateral wall of the intercondylar notch. We reviewed all operative notes and intraoperative arthroscopic images to assess tunnel placement. Postoperative anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were obtained in all patients. Anatomic placement was confirmed by review of lateral radiographs utilizing both the quadrant method (QM) and Blumensaat-ridge ratio (BRR). We used a total of 80 patients for our study. Review of arthroscopic images confirmed anatomic placement of the ACL femoral tunnel in all patients. All patients demonstrated that the femoral tunnel was placed anatomically according to the BRR method. Using the QM, all femoral tunnels were placed anatomically except for one tunnel that was placed slightly anteriorly. There was excellent agreement between the two radiographic measurement techniques. The principal finding of this study indicates that the lateral intercondylar ridge and the lateral bifurcate ridge are reliable landmarks for anatomic placement of the ACL femoral tunnel. Referencing osseous landmarks during surgery can help surgeons avoid nonanatomic placement of the ACL femoral tunnel, especially in cases where the soft-tissue footprint is no longer present. Furthermore, both the radiographic QM and the BRR are valid techniques to assess for anatomic ACL femoral tunnel placement both intraoperatively and postoperatively.

 
  • References

  • 1 Howe JG, Johnson RJ, Kaplan MJ, Fleming B, Jarvinen M. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadriceps patellar tendon graft. Part I. Long-term followup. Am J Sports Med 1991; 19 (5) 447-457
  • 2 Kaplan MJ, Howe JG, Fleming B, Johnson RJ, Jarvinen M. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadriceps patellar tendon graft. Part II. A specific sport review. Am J Sports Med 1991; 19 (5) 458-462
  • 3 Kornblatt I, Warren RF, Wickiewicz TL. Long-term followup of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the quadriceps tendon substitution for chronic anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Am J Sports Med 1988; 16 (5) 444-448
  • 4 Ardern CL, Taylor NF, Feller JA, Webster KE. Return-to-sport outcomes at 2 to 7 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Am J Sports Med 2012; 40 (1) 41-48
  • 5 Ardern CL, Webster KE, Taylor NF, Feller JA. Return to the preinjury level of competitive sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: two-thirds of patients have not returned by 12 months after surgery. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39 (3) 538-543
  • 6 McCullough KA, Phelps KD, Spindler KP , et al; MOON Group. Return to high school- and college-level football after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) cohort study. Am J Sports Med 2012; 40 (11) 2523-2529
  • 7 Farrow LD, Gillespie RJ, Victoroff BN, Cooperman DR. Radiographic location of the lateral intercondylar ridge: its relationship to Blumensaat's line. Am J Sports Med 2008; 36 (10) 2002-2006
  • 8 Bernard M, Hertel P, Hornung H, Cierpinski T. Femoral insertion of the ACL. Radiographic quadrant method. Am J Knee Surg 1997; 10 (1) 14-21 , discussion 21–22
  • 9 Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33 (1) 159-174
  • 10 Purnell ML, Larson AI, Clancy W. Anterior cruciate ligament insertions on the tibia and femur and their relationships to critical bony landmarks using high-resolution volume-rendering computed tomography. Am J Sports Med 2008; 36 (11) 2083-2090
  • 11 Hutchinson MR, Ash SA. Resident's ridge: assessing the cortical thickness of the lateral wall and roof of the intercondylar notch. Arthroscopy 2003; 19 (9) 931-935
  • 12 Ferretti M, Ekdahl M, Shen W, Fu FH. Osseous landmarks of the femoral attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic study. Arthroscopy 2007; 23 (11) 1218-1225
  • 13 Farrow LD, Chen MR, Cooperman DR, Victoroff BN, Goodfellow DB. Morphology of the femoral intercondylar notch. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (10) 2150-2155
  • 14 Tsukada S, Fujishiro H, Watanabe K , et al. Anatomic variations of the lateral intercondylar ridge: relationship to the anterior margin of the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 2014; 42 (5) 1110-1117
  • 15 Fu FH, Bennett CH, Ma CB, Menetrey J, Lattermann C. Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part II. Operative procedures and clinical correlations. Am J Sports Med 2000; 28 (1) 124-130
  • 16 Allum R. Complications of arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003; 85 (1) 12-16
  • 17 Loh JC, Fukuda Y, Tsuda E, Steadman RJ, Fu FH, Woo SL. Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison between 11 o'clock and 10 o'clock femoral tunnel placement. 2002 Richard O'Connor Award paper. Arthroscopy 2003; 19 (3) 297-304
  • 18 Odensten M, Gillquist J. Functional anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament and a rationale for reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985; 67 (2) 257-262
  • 19 Markolf KL, Hame S, Hunter DM , et al. Effects of femoral tunnel placement on knee laxity and forces in an anterior cruciate ligament graft. J Orthop Res 2002; 20 (5) 1016-1024
  • 20 Norwood Jr LA, Cross MJ. The intercondylar shelf and the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 1977; 5 (4) 171-176
  • 21 Howell SM, Taylor MA. Failure of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament due to impingement by the intercondylar roof. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75 (7) 1044-1055
  • 22 Kieffer DA, Curnow RJ, Southwell RB, Tucker WF, Kendrick KK. Anterior cruciate ligament arthroplasty. Am J Sports Med 1984; 12 (4) 301-312
  • 23 Bernard M, Hertel P. [Intraoperative and postoperative insertion control of anterior cruciate ligament-plasty. A radiologic measuring method (quadrant method)]. Unfallchirurg 1996; 99 (5) 332-340