Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1588494
Bromine-Radical-Mediated Synthesis of β-Functionalized β,γ- and δ,ε-Unsaturated Ketones via C–H Functionalization of Aldehydes
This work has been supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the MEXT (no. 15H05850). T.K. acknowledges the Research Fellowship of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for Young Scientists.Publication History
Received: 26 April 2017
Accepted after revision: 15 June 2017
Publication Date:
29 June 2017 (online)
Published as part of the ISHC Conference Special Section
Abstract
The bromine-radical-mediated allylation reaction of aldehydes was studied. In the presence of V-65 as radical initiator, the reaction of aldehydes with allyl bromides gave β,γ-unsaturated ketones in good yields (13 examples, 45–84%). The reaction is triggered by hydrogen abstraction from the aldehyde by bromine radical to form an acyl radical, which undergoes an SH2′-type addition–elimination reaction with allyl bromides to give coupling products with liberation of bromine radical. Three-component coupling reactions comprising aldehydes, electron-deficient alkenes, and methallyl bromide also proceeded to give δ,ε-unsaturated ketones.
Key words
bromine radical - SH2′ reaction - β,γ-unsaturated ketones - δ,ε-unsaturated ketones - three-component reactionSupporting Information
- Supporting information for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1588494.
- Supporting Information
-
References and Notes
- 1a Estévez RE. Justicia J. Bazdi B. Fuentes N. Paradas M. Choquesillo-Lazarte D. Garca-Ruiz JM. Robles R. Gansäuer A. Cuerva JM. Oltra JE. Chem. Eur. J. 2009; 15: 2774
- 1b Yus M. González-Gómez JC. Foubelo F. Chem. Rev. 2011; 111: 7774
- 1c Moody CL. Pugh DS. Taylor RJ. K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011; 52: 2511
- 1d Anand RC. Singh V. Heterocycles 1993; 36: 1333
- 1e Yang W. Zhou Y. Sun H. Zhang L. Zhao F. Liu H. RSC Adv. 2014; 4: 15007
- 2a Barbier reaction with nitrile and allylzinc: Lee AS.-Y. Lin L.-S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000; 41: 8803
- 2b Allylmercury and acid chloride: Larock RC. Lu Y.-D. J. Org. Chem. 1993; 58: 2846
- 2c Yadav JS. Reddy BV. S. Reddy MS. Paramala G. Synthesis 2003; 2390
- 2d Gohain M. Gogoi BJ. Prajapati D. Sandhu JS. New. J. Chem. 2003; 27: 1038
- 3 For a review on acyl radicals; see: Chatgilialoglu C. Crich D. Komatsu M. Ryu I. Chem. Rev. 1999; 99: 1991
- 4a Ryu I. Sonoda N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996; 35: 1050
- 4b Ryu I. Sonoda N. Curran DP. Chem. Rev. 1996; 96: 177
- 4c Ryu I. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2001; 30: 16
- 4d Ryu I. Chem. Rec. 2002; 2: 249
- 4e Fusano A. Ryu I. In Science of Synthesis:Multicomponent Reactions 2 . Müller TJ. J. Thieme; Stuttgart: 2014
- 5 Ryu I. Yamazaki H. Kusano K. Ogawa A. Sonoda N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991; 113: 8558
- 6a Ryu I. Yamazaki H. Ogawa A. Kambe N. Sonoda N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993; 115: 1187
- 6b Ryu I. Niguma T. Minakata S. Komatsu M. Luo Z. Curran DP. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999; 40: 2367
- 6c Uenoyama Y. Fukuyama T. Ryu I. Synlett 2006; 2342
- 7a Curran DP. Xu J. Lazzarini E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995; 117: 6603
- 7b Curran DP. Xu J. Lazzarini E. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1995; 3049
- 8a Kharasch MS. Sage M. J. Org. Chem. 1949; 14: 79
- 8b Kharasch MS. Büchi G. J. Org. Chem. 1949; 14: 84
- 9a Tanko JM. Sadeghipour M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999; 38: 159
- 9b Struss JA. Sadeghipour M. Tanko JM. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009; 50: 2119
- 10a Kippo T. Fukuyama T. Ryu I. Org. Lett. 2010; 12: 4006
- 10b Kippo T. Fukuyama T. Ryu I. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 3864
- 10c Kippo T. Hamaoka K. Ryu I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013; 135: 632
- 10d Kippo T. Ryu I. Chem. Commun. 2014; 50: 5993
- 10e Kippo T. Kimura Y. Maeda A. Matsubara H. Fukuyama T. Ryu I. Org. Chem. Front. 2014; 1: 755
- 11a Marko IE. Mekhalfia A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990; 31: 7237
- 11b Marko IE. Mekhalfia A. Ollis WD. Synlett 1990; 347
- 11c Kraus GA. Liu F. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012; 53: 111
- 12 This isomerization is presumably due to HBr, byproduct of the reaction, and probably V-65 has an advantage of running the radical reaction at lower temperature, which slows down the isomerization reaction.
- 13a Fujiwara T. Morita K. Takeda T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1989; 62: 1524
- 13b Kuroda C. Kobayashi K. Koito A. Anzai S. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2001; 74: 1947
- 13c Takayama H. Sudo R. Kitajima M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005; 46: 5795
- 14 General Procedure for the Synthesis of 3 To a 20 mL two-necked round-bottom flask attached with a reflux condenser were added V-65 (25 mg, 0.1 mmol) and K2CO3 (138 mg, 1.0 mmol), and this flask was purged with argon. Then, 1-nonanal (1a, 71 mg, 0.5 mmol), methyl 2-(bromomethyl)acrylate (2a, 269 mg, 1.5 mmol), and degassed benzene (5 mL) were added. The mixture was stirred at 60 °C for 1 h. The reaction mixture was filtered through a short plug of Celite, and the filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by flash column chromatography on SiO2 (hexane/EtOAc = 1:0 to 30:1) and preparative HPLC (chloroform) to give methyl 2-methylene-4-oxododecanoate (3b, 101 mg, 84%). Colorless oil; Rf = 0.55 (hexane/EtOAc = 5:1). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 0.87 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 3 H), 1.20–1.33 (m, 10 H), 1.55–1.65 (m, 2 H), 2.47 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2 H), 3.40 (s, 2 H), 3.74 (s, 3 H), 5.63 (s, 1 H), 6.33 (s, 1 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 14.02, 22.58, 23.67, 29.10, 29.30, 31.76, 42.63, 45.63, 52.00, 128.53, 134.25, 166.78, 207.42. IR (neat): 2953, 2926, 2855, 1720, 1638 cm–1. MS (EI): m/z (relative intensity): 240 (12) [M]+, 209 (5) [M – OMe]+, 141 (100), 82 (14), 71 (25), 57 (26), 55 (11). HRMS (EI): m/z calcd for C14H23O3 [M]+: 240.1725; found: 240.1725.
- 15 General Procedure for the Synthesis of 5 To a 20 mL two-necked round-bottom flask attached with a reflux condenser were added AIBN (16 mg, 0.1 mmol) and K2CO3 (138 mg, 1.0 mmol), and this flask was purged with argon. Then, 1-nonanal (1a, 71 mg, 0.5 mmol), acrylonitrile (4a, 53 mg, 1.0 mmol), methallyl bromide (2e, 203 mg, 1.5 mmol), and degassed benzene (5 mL) were added. The mixture was stirred at 80 °C for 4 h. The reaction mixture was filtered through a short plug of Celite, and the filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by flash column chromatography on SiO2 (hexane/EtOAc = 1:0 to 30:1) and preparative HPLC (CHCl3) to give 2-(2-methylallyl)-4-oxododecanenitrile (5a, 71.1 mg, 57%). Compound 5a is known in literature, and all spectral data matched that reported.6b
For typical preparative methods, see:
For reviews on radical carbonylations, see:
For examples of the UMCT concept, see:
For earlier work, see:
For a recent example, see: