Children with Specific Language Impairment and Their Families: A Future View of Nature Plus Nurture and New Technologies for Comprehensive Language Intervention Strategies

Abstract

Future perspectives on children with language impairments are framed from what is known about children with specific language impairment (SLI). A summary of the current state of services is followed by discussion of how these children can be overlooked and misunderstood and consideration of why it is so hard for some children to acquire language when it is effortless for most children. Genetic influences are highlighted, with the suggestion that nature plus nurture should be considered in present as well as future intervention approaches. A nurture perspective highlights the family context of the likelihood of SLI for some of the children. Future models of the causal pathways may provide more specific information to guide gene–treatment decisions, in ways parallel to current personalized medicine approaches. Future treatment options can build on the potential of electronic technologies and social media to provide personalized treatment methods available at a time and place convenient for the person to use as often as desired. The speech-language pathologist could oversee a wide range of treatment options and monitor evidence provided electronically to evaluate progress and plan future treatment steps. Most importantly, future methods can provide lifelong language acquisition activities that maintain the privacy and dignity of persons with language impairment, and in so doing will in turn enhance the effectiveness of speech-language pathologists.

Keywords:

Child language impairment - specific language impairment - intervention - genetics

• References

• 1 Morgan PL, Farkas G, Hillemeier MM , et al. Minorities are disproportionately underrepresented in special education: longitudinal evidence across five disability conditions. Educ Res 2015; 44 (5) 278-292
• 2 Tomblin JB, Records NL, Buckwalter P, Zhang X, Smith E, O'Brien M. Prevalence of specific language impairment in kindergarten children. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1997; 40 (6) 1245-1260
• 3 Norbury CF, Gooch D, Wray C , et al. The impact of nonverbal ability on prevalence and clinical presentation of language disorder: evidence from a population study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2016;
• 4 U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD). Specific language impairment. Available at: https://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/specific-language-impairment . Accessed August 8, 2016
• 5 Shriberg LD, Tomblin JB, McSweeny JL. Prevalence of speech delay in 6-year-old children and comorbidity with language impairment. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1999; 42 (6) 1461-1481
• 6 Tomblin JB, Nippold MA. Understanding Individual Differences in Language Development across the School Years. New York, NY: Psychology Press; 2014
• 7 Rice ML, Hadley PA, Alexander AL. Social biases toward children with speech and language impairments: a correlative causal model of language limitations. Appl Psycholinguist 1993; 14: 445-471
• 8 Rice ML. Specific language impairment, nonverbal IQ, ADHD, ASD, cochlear implants, bilingualism and dialectal variants: defining the boundaries, clarifying clinical conditions and sorting out causes. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2016; 59: 122-132
• 9 Redmond SM, Rice ML. Stability of behavioral ratings of children with SLI. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2002; 45 (1) 190-201
• 10 Redmond SM, Rice ML. The socioemotional behaviors of children with SLI: social adaptation or social deviance?. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1998; 41 (3) 688-700
• 11 Redmond SM. Peer victimization among students with specific language impairment, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and typical development. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2011; 42 (4) 520-535
• 12 Gertner BL, Rice ML, Hadley PA. Influence of communicative competence on peer preferences in a preschool classroom. J Speech Hear Res 1994; 37 (4) 913-923
• 13 Rice ML, Sell MA, Hadley PA. Social interactions of speech- and language-impaired children. J Speech Hear Res 1991; 34 (6) 1299-1307
• 14 Ash AC, Rice ML, Redmond SM. Effect of language context on ratings of shy and unsociable behaviors in English language learner children. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2014; 45 (1) 52-66
• 15 Rice ML, Hoffman L. Predicting vocabulary growth in children with and without specific language impairment: a longitudinal study from 2;6 to 21 years of age. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2015; 58 (2) 345-359
• 16 Rice ML, Wexler K. Toward tense as a clinical marker of specific language impairment in English-speaking children. J Speech Hear Res 1996; 39 (6) 1239-1257
• 17 Rice ML, Wexler K. Rice/Wexler Test of Early Grammatical Impairment. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 2001
• 18 Rice ML, Hoffman L, Wexler K. Judgments of omitted BE and DO in questions as extended finiteness clinical markers of specific language impairment (SLI) to 15 years: a study of growth and asymptote. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2009; 52 (6) 1417-1433
• 19 Rice ML. Language growth and genetics of specific language impairment. Int J Speech-Language Pathol 2013; 15 (3) 223-233
• 20 Rice ML. Toward epigenetic and gene regulation models of specific language impairment: looking for links among growth, genes, and impairments. J Neurodev Disord 2012; 4 (1) 27
• 21 Rice ML, Zubrick SR, Taylor CL, Gayán J, Bontempo DE. Late language emergence in 24 month twins: heritable and increased risk for twins. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2014; 57: 917-928
• 22 Hayiou-Thomas ME, Dale PS, Plomin R. Language impairment from 4 to 12 years: prediction and etiology. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2014; 57 (3) 850-864
• 23 Hayiou-Thomas ME, Dale PS, Plomin R. The etiology of variation in language skills changes with development: a longitudinal twin study of language from 2 to 12 years. Dev Sci 2012; 15 (2) 233-249
• 24 Dale PS, Tosto MG, Hayiou-Thomas ME, Plomin R. Why does parental language input style predict child language development? A twin study of gene-environment correlation. J Commun Disord 2015; 57: 106-117
• 25 Rice ML, Haney KR, Wexler K. Family histories of children with SLI who show extended optional infinitives. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1998; 41 (2) 419-432
• 26 Raza MH, Mattera R, Morell R , et al. Association between rare variants in AP4E1, a component of intracullular trafficking, and persistent stuttering. Am J Hum Genet 2015; 97 (5) 715-725
• 27 Redmond SM. Language impairment in the attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder context. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2016; 59 (1) 133-142