Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Arquivos Brasileiros de Neurocirurgia: Brazilian Neurosurgery 2016; 35(03): 197-206
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1586761
Original Article | Artigo Original

The Extended Pterional Approach and Microsurgery Resection for Craniopharyngiomas, Operative Nuances and Results: A Series of 29 Patients

Craniotomia pterional estendida e remoção microcirúrgica dos craniofaringiomas, nuances cirúrgicas e resultados: uma série de 29 pacientes
Jose Carlos Lynch
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Federal dos Servidores do Estado (HFSE), Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
,
Celestino Pereira
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Federal dos Servidores do Estado (HFSE), Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
,
Valérie Manicacci
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Federal dos Servidores do Estado (HFSE), Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
,
Mariangela Gonçalves
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Federal dos Servidores do Estado (HFSE), Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
,
Leonardo Welling
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Federal dos Servidores do Estado (HFSE), Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
,
Rudy Lenk
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Federal dos Servidores do Estado (HFSE), Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective The aim of this paper is to observe if the extended pterional approach for the removal of craniopharyngiomas is safe and effective. The mortality, morbidity, and recurrence rates are presented and discussed.

Method This is a retrospective analysis of 29 craniopharyngioma patients who underwent surgery between January 1988 and December 2014 at the Department of Neurosurgery of the Hospital Federal dos Servidores do Estado, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The charts, operative reports and imaging studies were reviewed.

Results We identified 17 males (58.6%) and 12 females (41.3%) ranging in age from 0.6 to 84 years (mean 57.4 years). Thirteen (44.8%) patients were infants or adolescents. Surgical mortality occurred in one patient (3.4%). Gross total tumor removal was achieved in 15 (51.7%) patients. The median follow-up time was 7.1 years.

Conclusion The extended pterional approach provides adequate access to craniopharyngiomas, and the majority of lesions could be totally removed, with a low mortality rate, but the best treatment for craniopharyngiomas remains controversial.

Resumo

Objetivo Observar se a craniotomia pterional estendida é uma técnica segura e efetiva.

Método É um estudo retrospectivo de 29 pacientes com craniofaringiomas que foram submetidos a craniotomia pterional estendida entre 1988 e 2014. As imagens e os prontuários foram analisados.

Resultados Esse grupo é composto por 17 homens (58,6%) e 12 mulheres (41,3%), e a idade variou de 0,6 a 84 anos (media 57,4 anos). Treze (44,8%) pacientes eram crianças ou adolescentes. A remoção total da lesão ocorreu em 15 (51,7%) indivíduos. A mortalidade cirúrgica: um paciente (3,4%). O follow-up médio é de 7,1 anos.

Conclusão A craniotomia pterional estendida permitiu a remoção total da lesão na maioria dos pacientes, com baixa mortalidade, porém o melhor tratamento para o craniofaringioma ainda gera muita controvérsia.

Keywords

extended pterional approach craniopharyngiomas - microsurgery - intracranial tumors - radical resection - tumor recurrence

Palavras-chave

acesso pterional estendido - craniofaringiomas - microcirurgia - tumores intracranianos - remoção radical - recorrência tumoral


Publication History

Received: 29 April 2016

Accepted: 22 June 2016

Publication Date:
09 August 2016 (online)

© 2016. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Publicações Ltda
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

 

  • References

  • 1 Bunin GR, Surawicz TS, Witman PA, Preston-Martin S, Davis F, Bruner JM. The descriptive epidemiology of craniopharyngioma. J Neurosurg 1998; 89 (04) 547-551
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Yaşargil MG, Curcic M, Kis M, Siegenthaler G, Teddy PJ, Roth P. Total removal of craniopharyngiomas. Approaches and long-term results in 144 patients. J Neurosurg 1990; 73 (01) 3-11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Teixeira Ribeiro JA, Plese JP, Marino Jr R. Tratamento dos craniofaringiomas por via transesfenoidal: resultados e seguimento pós-operatórios. J Bras Neurocir 2005; 16 (01) 5-12
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Fahlbusch R, Honegger J, Paulus W, Huk W, Buchfelder M. Surgical treatment of craniopharyngiomas: experience with 168 patients. J Neurosurg 1999; 90 (02) 237-250
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Hoffman HJ, De Silva M, Humphreys RP, Drake JM, Smith ML, Blaser SI. Aggressive surgical management of craniopharyngiomas in children. J Neurosurg 1992; 76 (01) 47-52
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Symon L, Sprich W. Radical excision of craniopharyngioma. Results in 20 patients. J Neurosurg 1985; 62 (02) 174-181
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Caldarelli M, di Rocco C, Papacci F, Colosimo Jr C. Management of recurrent craniopharyngioma. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1998; 140 (05) 447-454
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Gerganov V, Metwali H, Samii A, Fahlbusch R, Samii M. Microsurgical resection of extensive craniopharyngiomas using a frontolateral approach: operative technique and outcome. J Neurosurg 2014; 120 (02) 559-570
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Cavallo LM, Frank G, Cappabianca P. et al. The endoscopic endonasal approach for the management of craniopharyngiomas: a series of 103 patients. J Neurosurg 2014; 121 (01) 100-113
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Cabezudo JM, Vaquero J, Areitio E, Martinez R, de Sola RG, Bravo G. Craniopharyngiomas: a critical approach to treatment. J Neurosurg 1981; 55 (03) 371-375
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Fischer EG, Welch K, Shillito Jr J, Winston KR, Tarbell NJ. Craniopharyngiomas in children. Long-term effects of conservative surgical procedures combined with radiation therapy. J Neurosurg 1990; 73 (04) 534-540
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Al-Mefty O, Ayoubi S, Kadri PA. The petrosal approach for the total removal of giant retrochiasmatic craniopharyngiomas in children. J Neurosurg 2007; 106 02 87-92
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Sainte-Rose C, Puget S, Wray A. et al. Craniopharyngioma: the pendulum of surgical management. Childs Nerv Syst 2005; 21 8-9 691-695
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Minamida Y, Mikami T, Hashi K, Houkin K. Surgical management of the recurrence and regrowth of craniopharyngiomas. J Neurosurg 2005; 103 (02) 224-232
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Pang D, Surgical management of craniopharyngioma, in surgery of cranial base tumors Seckhar LN, Janeka IP. (eds) NY: Raven press; 1993: 787-807
  • 16 Samii M, Samii A. Surgical management of craniopharyngioma, in Schmidek HH (ed): Schmidek and Sweet. Operative Neurological Techniques: Indications, Methods, and Results, ed 4. Philadelphia, WB Saunders: 2000: 489-502
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Kassam AB, Gardner PA, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Mintz AH, Prevedello DM. Expanded endonasal approach, a fully endoscopic transnasal approach for the resection of midline suprasellar craniopharyngiomas: a new classification based on the infundibulum. J Neurosurg 2008; 108 (04) 715-728
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 de Divitiis E, Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, Esposito F, de Divitiis O, Messina A. Extended endoscopic transsphenoidal approach for extrasellar craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurgery 2007; 61 (05) 02 219-227 discussion 228
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Jane Jr JA, Kiehna E, Payne SC, Early SV, Laws Jr ER. Early outcomes of endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for adult craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurg Focus 2010; 28 (04) E9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Elliott RE, Wisoff JH. Surgical management of giant pediatric craniopharyngiomas. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2010; 6 (05) 403-416
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Mortini P, Losa M, Pozzobon G. et al. Neurosurgical treatment of craniopharyngioma in adults and children: early and long-term results in a large case series. J Neurosurg 2011; 114 (05) 1350-1359
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Lee EJ, Cho YH, Hong SH, Kim JH, Kim CJ. Is the Complete Resection of Craniopharyngiomas in Adults Feasible Considering Both the Oncologic and Functional Outcomes?. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2015; 58 (05) 432-441
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Lena G, Paz Paredes A, Scavarda D, Giusiano B. Craniopharyngioma in children: Marseille experience. Childs Nerv Syst 2005; 21 8–9 778-784
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Tomita T, McLone DG. Radical resections of childhood craniopharyngiomas. Pediatr Neurosurg 1993; 19 (01) 6-14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Gonc EN, Yordam N, Ozon A, Alikasifoglu A, Kandemir N. Endocrinological outcome of different treatment options in children with craniopharyngioma: a retrospective analysis of 66 cases. Pediatr Neurosurg 2004; 40 (03) 112-119
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Leng LZ, Greenfield JP, Souweidane MM, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Endoscopic, endonasal resection of craniopharyngiomas: analysis of outcome including extent of resection, cerebrospinal fluid leak, return to preoperative productivity, and body mass index. Neurosurgery 2012; 70 (01) 110-123 discussion 123–124
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Patel KS, Raza SM, McCoul ED. et al. Long-term quality of life after endonasal endoscopic resection of adult craniopharyngiomas. J Neurosurg 2015; 123 (03) 571-580
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Gardner PA, Kassam AB, Snyderman CH. et al. Outcomes following endoscopic, expanded endonasal resection of suprasellar craniopharyngiomas: a case series. J Neurosurg 2008; 109 (01) 6-16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Frank G, Pasquini E, Doglietto F. et al. The endoscopic extended transsphenoidal approach for craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurgery 2006; 59 (01) ONS75-ONS83 discussion ONS75–ONS83
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Merchant TE, Kiehna EN, Sanford RA. et al. Craniopharyngioma: the St. Jude Children's Research Hospital experience 1984-2001. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002; 53 (03) 533-542
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Perneczky A, Reisch R. Keyhole approaches in neurosurgery. Vol 1. Concept and surgical technique. Austria: Springer; 2008: 37-83
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Fatemi N, Dusick JR, de Paiva Neto MA, Malkasian D, Kelly DF. Endonasal versus supraorbital keyhole removal of craniopharyngiomas and tuberculum sellae meningiomas. Neurosurgery 2009; 64 (05) 269-284 2 discussion 284–286
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Wilson DA, Duong H, Teo C, Kelly DF. The supraorbital endoscopic approach for tumors. World Neurosurg 2014; 82 1-2 e243-e256
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Hoogenhout J, Otten BJ, Kazem I, Stoelinga GB, Walder AH. Surgery and radiation therapy in the management of craniopharyngiomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1984; 10 (12) 2293-2297
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Julow J, Lányi F, Hajda M. et al. Further experiences in the treatment of cystic craniopharyngeomas with yttrium 90 silicate colloid. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 1988; 42: 113-119
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Kobayashi T, Kida Y, Hasegawa T. Long-term results of gamma knife surgery for craniopharyngioma. Neurosurg Focus 2003; 14 (05) e13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Hukin J, Steinbok P, Lafay-Cousin L. et al. Intracystic bleomycin therapy for craniopharyngioma in children: the Canadian experience. Cancer 2007; 109 (10) 2124-2131
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Cavalheiro S, Dastoli PA, Silva NS, Toledo S, Lederman H, da Silva MC. Use of interferon alpha in intratumoral chemotherapy for cystic craniopharyngioma. Childs Nerv Syst 2005; 21 8–9 719-724
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar