J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2016; 77(06): 473-478
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1583947
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Superolateral Orbitotomy for Intraorbital Tumors: Comparison with the Conventional Approach

Mine Seiichiro
1   Division of Neurosurgery, Chiba Prefectural Sawara Hospital, Katori, Chiba, Japan
,
Higuchi Yoshinori
2   Department of Neurological Surgery, Chiba University, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
,
Horiguchi Kentaro
2   Department of Neurological Surgery, Chiba University, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
,
Saeki Naokatu
2   Department of Neurological Surgery, Chiba University, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

01 November 2015

04 April 2016

Publication Date:
09 May 2016 (online)

Abstract

Objectives This study aims to compare the surgical and functional outcomes of superolateral orbitotomy (group A) and conventional superior orbitotomy (group B) for benign orbital tumors.

Design A retrospective review of 31 consecutive orbital tumor surgeries with the fronto-orbital approach was conducted.

Setting Procedures were performed at two institutions by a single surgeon.

Participants A total of 31 orbital tumor patients participated in this study. Overall, 11 intraconal and 2 extraconal tumors in group A and 11 intraconal and 7 extraconal tumors in group B were resected by superolateral orbitotomy, respectively.

Main Outcome Measures Demographic information, pre- and postoperative neurological findings and neuroimaging data, and pathological data were collected. Surgical and functional outcomes were compared and statistically analyzed between the two different surgical procedures.

Results The surgical outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups. In patients with intraconal tumors, the functional outcome was significantly better in group A than in group B.

Conclusion Superolateral orbitotomy provides better functional outcomes.

 
  • References

  • 1 Natori Y, Rhoton Jr AL. Transcranial approach to the orbit: microsurgical anatomy. J Neurosurg 1994; 81 (1) 78-86
  • 2 Kiratli H, Bulur B, Bilgiç S. Transconjunctival approach for retrobulbar intraconal orbital cavernous hemangiomas. Orbital surgeon's perspective. Surg Neurol 2005; 64 (1) 71-74
  • 3 Sieskiewicz A, Lyson T, Mariak Z, Rogowski M. Endoscopic trans-nasal approach for biopsy of orbital tumours using image-guided neuro-navigation system. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2008; 150 (5) 441-445 , discussion 445
  • 4 Maroon JC, Kennerdell JS. Microsurgical approach to orbital tumors. Clin Neurosurg 1979; 26: 479-489
  • 5 Maier W, Ridder GJ, Kaminsky J, Grosu AL. Therapy of posterior orbital tumors [in German]. Ophthalmologe 2011; 108 (6) 531-539
  • 6 Maroon JC, Kennerdell JS. Surgical approaches to the orbit. Indications and techniques. J Neurosurg 1984; 60 (6) 1226-1235
  • 7 Jane JA, Park TS, Pobereskin LH, Winn HR, Butler AB. The supraorbital approach: technical note. Neurosurgery 1982; 11 (4) 537-542
  • 8 Al-Mefty O, Fox JL. Superolateral orbital exposure and reconstruction. Surg Neurol 1985; 23 (6) 609-613
  • 9 Fukushima T, Nonaka Y. Exercise 4: Orbital approach. In: Fukushima T, ed. Fukushima Manual of Skull Base Dissection. Raleigh, NC: AF-Neuro Video Inc.; 2011: 82-95
  • 10 Mine S, Optic sheath meningioma. In: Kodama M, Kawase T, Yoshida J, Hashimoto N. , eds. Principles and Advances in Neurological Surgery. Vol. 7. Tokyo, Japan: Nakayama-Shoten; 2004: 98-106
  • 11 Markakis E, Kolenda H, Behnke J, Mühlendyck H. Frontobasal osteoplastic orbitotomy in surgical treatment of intraorbital processes [in German]. Neurochirurgia (Stuttg) 1990; 33 (3) 73-77
  • 12 Fukushima T, Tsuchimochi H, Yamamoto M , et al. Surgical approach to the cavernous angioma of the orbit with special reference to the orbital microsurgical anatomy. Jpn J Neurosurg (Tokyo) 1998; 7: 609-614
  • 13 Purgason PA, Hornblass A. Complications of surgery for orbital tumors. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 8 (2) 88-93
  • 14 Abuzayed B, Kucukyuruk B, Tanriover N , et al. Transcranial superior orbitotomy for the treatment of intraorbital intraconal tumors: surgical technique and long-term results in single institute. Neurosurg Rev 2012; 35 (4) 573-582 , discussion 582
  • 15 Missori P, Tarantino R, Delfini R, Lunardi P, Cantore G. Surgical management of orbital cavernous angiomas: prognosis for visual function after removal. Neurosurgery 1994; 35 (1) 34-38
  • 16 Bernardini FP, Kersten RC, Devoto MH, Morton AD, Johnson TE. Outcomes after surgical excision of large and massive orbital tumors. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 24 (4) 280-283
  • 17 Singh D, Pushker N, Bajaj MS, Saxena R, Sharma S, Ghose S. Visual function alterations in orbital tumors and factors predicting visual outcome after surgery. Eye (Lond) 2012; 26 (3) 448-453
  • 18 Carta F, Siccardi D, Cossu M, Viola C, Maiello M. Removal of tumours of the orbital apex via a postero-lateral orbitotomy. J Neurosurg Sci 1998; 42 (4) 185-188
  • 19 Goldberg RA, Shorr N, Arnold AC, Garcia GH. Deep transorbital approach to the apex and cavernous sinus. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 14 (5) 336-341
  • 20 Mourier KL, Cophignon J, D'Hermies F, Clay C, Lot G, George B. Superolateral approach to orbital tumors. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 1994; 37 (1) 9-11
  • 21 Shriver EM, Ragheb J, Tse DT. Combined transcranial-orbital approach for resection of optic nerve gliomas: a clinical and anatomical study. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 28 (3) 184-191