Download PDF
Semin intervent Radiol 2016; 33(02): 075-078
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1582123
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Permanent versus Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava Filters: Rethinking the “One-Filter-for-All” Approach to Mechanical Thromboembolic Prophylaxis

Christine E. Ghatan
1   Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado
,
Robert K. Ryu
1   Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
10 May 2016 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Inferior vena cava (IVC) filtration for thromboembolic protection is not without risks, and there are important differences among commercially available IVC filters. While retrievable filters are approved for permanent implantation, they may be associated with higher device-related complications in the long term when compared with permanent filters. Prospective patient selection in determining which patients might be better served by permanent or retrievable filter devices is central to resource optimization, in addition to improved clinical follow-up and a concerted effort to retrieve filters when no longer needed. This article highlights the differences between permanent and retrievable devices, describes the interplay between these differences and the clinical indications for IVC filtration, advises against a “one-filter-for-all” approach to mechanical thromboembolic prophylaxis, and discusses strategies for optimizing personalized device selection.

Keywords

inferior vena cava filters - optional filter - retrievable filter - complications - patient selection - interventional radiology
 

  • References

  • 1 Stein PD, Kayali F, Olson RE. Twenty-one-year trends in the use of inferior vena cava filters. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164 (14) 1541-1545
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Gaspard SF, Gaspard DJ. Retrievable inferior vena cava filters are rarely removed. Am Surg 2009; 75 (5) 426-428
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Kaufman JA, Rundback JH, Kee ST , et al. Development of a research agenda for inferior vena cava filters: proceedings from a multidisciplinary research consensus panel. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2009; 20 (6) 697-707
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Kaufman JA, Kinney TB, Streiff MB , et al. Guidelines for the use of retrievable and convertible vena cava filters: report from the Society of Interventional Radiology multidisciplinary consensus conference. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2006; 17 (3) 449-459
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Tamrazi A, Wadhwa V, Holly B , et al. Percutaneous retrieval of permanent inferior vena cava filters. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2016; 39 (4) 538-546
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Mousa AY, AbuHalimah S, Yacoub M, Sheikh I, AbuRahma AF. Tips and tricks for retrieval of permanent TRAPEASE filters for inferior vena cava. Vascular 2015; 23 (6) 648-652
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ray Jr CE, Mitchell E, Zipser S, Kao EY, Brown CF, Moneta GL. Outcomes with retrievable inferior vena cava filters: a multicenter study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2006; 17 (10) 1595-1604
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Haas SK. Venous thromboembolic risk and its prevention in hospitalized medical patients. Semin Thromb Hemost 2002; 28 (6) 577-584
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Geerts WH, Bergqvist D, Pineo GF , et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008; 133 (6, Suppl): 381S-453S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Geerts WH, Pineo GF, Heit JA , et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest 2004; 126 (3, Suppl): 338S-400S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Büller HR, Agnelli G, Hull RD, Hyers TM, Prins MH, Raskob GE. Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest 2004; 126 (3, Suppl): 401S-428S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Gerotziafas GT, Samama MM. Prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in medical patients. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2004; 10 (5) 356-365
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 McRae SJ, Ginsberg JS. Initial treatment of venous thromboembolism. Circulation 2004; 110 (9) (Suppl. 01) I3-I9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Bergmann JF, Elkharrat D. Prevention of venous thromboembolic risk in non-surgical patients. Haemostasis 1996; 26 (Suppl. 02) 16-23
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Decousus H, Leizorovicz A, Parent F , et al. A clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis. Prévention du Risque d'Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave Study Group. N Engl J Med 1998; 338 (7) 409-415
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Morales JP, Li X, Irony TZ, Ibrahim NG, Moynahan M, Cavanaugh KJ. Decision analysis of retrievable inferior vena cava filters in patients without pulmonary embolism. J Vasc Surg 2013; 1 (4) 376-384
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Stein PD, Matta F, Hull RD. Increasing use of vena cava filters for prevention of pulmonary embolism. Am J Med 2011; 124 (7) 655-661
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Division of Small Manufacturers IaCAD, Food and Drug Administration. Removing Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava Filters: Initial Communication. 2010; Available at: http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/ucm221676.htm . Accessed November 19, 2015
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Hemmila MR, Osborne NH, Henke PK , et al. Prophylactic inferior vena cava filter placement does not result in a survival benefit for trauma patients. Ann Surg 2015; 262 (4) 577-585
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Rowland SP, Dharmarajah B, Moore HM , et al. Inferior vena cava filters for prevention of venous thromboembolism in obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Ann Surg 2015; 261 (1) 35-45
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Lee MJ, Valenti D, de Gregorio MA, Minocha J, Rimon U, Pellerin O. The CIRSE Retrievable IVC Filter Registry: Retrieval Success Rates in Practice. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2015; 38 (6) 1502-1507
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Eifler AC, Lewandowski RJ, Gupta R , et al. Optional or permanent: clinical factors that optimize inferior vena cava filter utilization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013; 24 (1) 35-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Andreoli JM, Lewandowski RJ, Vogelzang RL, Ryu RK. Comparison of complication rates associated with permanent and retrievable inferior vena cava filters: a review of the MAUDE database. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2014; 25 (8) 1181-1185
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) FaDA. Removing Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava Filters: FDA Safety Communication. 2014 ; Available at: http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/ucm396377.htm . Accessed November 19, 2015
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Caplin DM, Nikolic B, Kalva SP, Ganguli S, Saad WE, Zuckerman DA ; Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee. Quality improvement guidelines for the performance of inferior vena cava filter placement for the prevention of pulmonary embolism. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2011; 22 (11) 1499-1506
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Kinney TB. Update on inferior vena cava filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14 (4) 425-440
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 An T, Moon E, Bullen J , et al. Prevalence and clinical consequences of fracture and fragment migration of the Bard G2 filter: imaging and clinical follow-up in 684 implantations. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2014; 25 (6) 941-948
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Bélénotti P, Sarlon-Bartoli G, Bartoli MA , et al. Vena cava filter migration: an unappreciated complication. About four cases and review of the literature. Ann Vasc Surg 2011; 25 (8) 1141.e9-1141.e14
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Chalhoub V, Richa F, Hachem K, Slaba S, Yazbeck P. Contributing factors to inferior vena cava filter migration. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2015; 38 (6) 1676-1677
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Streiff MB. Vena caval filters: a comprehensive review. Blood 2000; 95 (12) 3669-3677
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Jia Z, Wu A, Tam M, Spain J, McKinney JM, Wang W. Caval penetration by inferior vena cava filters: a systematic literature review of clinical significance and management. Circulation 2015; 132 (10) 944-952
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Group PS ; PREPIC Study Group. Eight-year follow-up of patients with permanent vena cava filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism: the PREPIC (Prevention du Risque d'Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave) randomized study. Circulation 2005; 112 (3) 416-422
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Athanasoulis CA, Kaufman JA, Halpern EF, Waltman AC, Geller SC, Fan CM. Inferior vena caval filters: review of a 26-year single-center clinical experience. Radiology 2000; 216 (1) 54-66
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Shaw CM, Scorza LB, Waybill PN, Singh H, Lynch FC. Optional vena cava filter use in the elderly population. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2011; 22 (6) 824-828
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Kim HS, Young MJ, Narayan AK, Hong K, Liddell RP, Streiff MB. A comparison of clinical outcomes with retrievable and permanent inferior vena cava filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2008; 19 (3) 393-399
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Janne d'Othée B, Faintuch S, Reedy AW, Nickerson CF, Rosen MP. Retrievable versus permanent caval filter procedures: when are they cost-effective for interventional radiology?. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2008; 19 (3) 384-392
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Ryu RK, Parikh P, Gupta R , et al. Optimizing IVC filter utilization: a prospective study of the impact of interventional radiologist consultation. J Am Coll Radiol 2012; 9 (9) 657-660
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Minocha J, Idakoji I, Riaz A , et al. Improving inferior vena cava filter retrieval rates: impact of a dedicated inferior vena cava filter clinic. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010; 21 (12) 1847-1851
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Albrecht RM, Garwe T, Carter SM, Maurer AJ. Retrievable inferior vena cava filters in trauma patients: factors that influence removal rate and an argument for institutional protocols. Am J Surg 2012; 203 (3) 297-302 , discussion 302
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar