Download PDF
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016; 20(03): 271-274
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1581091
Original Research
Thieme Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Minimally Invasive Surgery for Intracochlear Schwannoma Removal and Simultaneous Cochlear Implantation

Ricardo Ferreira Bento
1   Department of Otolaryngology, School of Medicine, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
,
Eloisa Maria Mello Santiago Gebrim
2   Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
,
Ana Tereza de Matos Magalhães
1   Department of Otolaryngology, School of Medicine, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
,
Larissa Vilela Pereira
1   Department of Otolaryngology, School of Medicine, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
,
Anna Carolina de Oliveira Fonseca
1   Department of Otolaryngology, School of Medicine, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

19 October 2016

12 February 2016

Publication Date:
07 April 2016 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction Hearing preservation has not yet been reported in patients undergoing resection of intracochlear schwannomas. This study describes a minimally invasive procedure for intracochlear schwannoma resection with simultaneous cochlear implantation that resulted in good hearing.

Objective This study aims to describe a minimally invasive procedure for intracochlear schwannoma resection with simultaneous cochlear implantation.

Data Synthesis The technique described in this study was developed for a 55-year-old male with a 20-year history of bilateral progressive hearing loss and tinnitus that had a mass in the left apical turn of the cochlea measuring 0.3 cm. Surgery accessed the apical turn of the cochlea. We performed mastoidectomy and posterior tympanotomy and removed incus and tensor tympani muscle to expose the cochlear apex. The tumor was identified and completely resected. After the cochlea was anatomically preserved, it was implanted with a straight electrode via round window insertion. The histopathological examination confirmed intracochlear schwannoma. Speech perception test revealed 100% speech recognition with closed sentences and the average audiometric threshold (500 to 2000 Hz) was 23 dB.

Conclusion Our technique led to rehabilitation of the patient and improved hearing without damaging the intracochlear structure, making it possible to perform CI in the same procedure with good results.

Keywords

cochlea - intracochlear schwannoma - hearing loss - hearing rehabilitation - cochlear implantation
 

  • References

  • 1 Bento RF. Tratado de Implante Coclear e Próteses Auditivas Implantáveis. 1st ed. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Thieme Publicações Ltda; 2014
    Google Scholar
  • 2 von Ilberg C, Kiefer J, Tillein J , et al. Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. New technology for severe hearing loss. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 1999; 61 (6) 334-340
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Skarzyński H, Lorens A, D'Haese P , et al. Preservation of residual hearing in children and post-lingually deafened adults after cochlear implantation: an initial study. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2002; 64 (4) 247-253
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bento RF, Brito Neto R, Castilho AM , et al. Resultados auditivos com o implante coclear multicanal em pacientes submetidos a cirurgia no Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2004; 70: 632-637
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Kiefer J, Pok M, Adunka O , et al. Combined electric and acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a clinical study. Audiol Neurootol 2005; 10 (3) 134-144
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Salzman KL, Childs AM, Davidson HC, Kennedy RJ, Shelton C, Harnsberger HR. Intralabyrinthine schwannomas: imaging diagnosis and classification. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012; 33 (1) 104-109
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Miller ME, Moriarty JM, Linetsky M, Lai C, Ishiyama A. Intracochlear schwannoma presenting as diffuse cochlear enhancement: diagnostic challenges of a rare cause of deafness. Ir J Med Sci 2012; 181 (1) 131-134
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Jiang ZY, Kutz Jr JW, Roland PS, Isaacson B. Intracochlear schwannomas confined to the otic capsule. Otol Neurotol 2011; 32 (7) 1175-1179
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Kronenberg J, Horowitz Z, Hildesheimer M. Intracochlear schwannoma and cochlear implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1999; 108 (7 Pt 1): 659-660
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Neff BA, Willcox Jr TO, Sataloff RT. Intralabyrinthine schwannomas. Otol Neurotol 2003; 24 (2) 299-307
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Magliulo G, Colicchio G, Romana AF, Stasolla A. Intracochlear schwannoma. Skull Base 2010; 20 (2) 115-118
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Green Jr JD, McKenzie JD. Diagnosis and management of intralabyrinthine schwannomas. Laryngoscope 1999; 109 (10) 1626-1631
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kennedy RJ, Shelton C, Salzman KL, Davidson HC, Harnsberger HR. Intralabyrinthine schwannomas: diagnosis, management, and a new classification system. Otol Neurotol 2004; 25 (2) 160-167
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar