Semin intervent Radiol 2016; 33(01): 031-038
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1572547
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Update on Insertion and Complications of Central Venous Catheters for Hemodialysis

Peter R. Bream Jr.
1   Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
2   Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
22 March 2016 (online)

Abstract

Central venous catheters are a popular choice for the initiation of hemodialysis or for bridging between different types of access. Despite this, they have many drawbacks including a high morbidity from thrombosis and infection. Advances in technology have allowed placement of these lines relatively safely, and national guidelines have been established to help prevent complications. There is an established algorithm for location and technique for placement that minimizes harm to the patient; however, there are significant short- and long-term complications that proceduralists who place catheters should be able to recognize and manage. This review covers insertion and complications of central venous catheters for hemodialysis, and the social and economic impact of the use of catheters for initiating dialysis is reviewed.

 
  • References

  • 1 KDOQI. 2006 Updates Clinical Practice Guidelines. Blood Press; 2006. ;33(5)
  • 2 Ash SR. Fluid mechanics and clinical success of central venous catheters for dialysis—answers to simple but persisting problems. Semin Dial 2007; 20 (3) 237-256
  • 3 Knuttinen MG, Bobra S, Hardman J, Gaba RC, Bui JT, Owens CA. A review of evolving dialysis catheter technologies. Semin Intervent Radiol 2009; 26 (2) 106-114
  • 4 Clark TWI, Jacobs D, Charles HW , et al. Comparison of heparin-coated and conventional split-tip hemodialysis catheters. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2009; 32 (4) 703-706
  • 5 Kakkos SK, Haddad GK, Haddad RK, Scully MM. Effectiveness of a new tunneled catheter in preventing catheter malfunction: a comparative study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2008; 19 (7) 1018-1026
  • 6 Spector M, Mojibian H, Eliseo D , et al. Clinical outcome of the Tal Palindrome chronic hemodialysis catheter: single institution experience. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2008; 19 (10) 1434-1438
  • 7 Caridi J, Ross E, Aspilcueta A, Wiley S. The cannon catheter—a prospective analysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010; 21 (10) 1588-1590
  • 8 Falk A, Parthasarathy S. Conversion of temporary hemodialysis catheters to tunneled hemodialysis catheters. Clin Nephrol 2005; 63 (3) 209-214
  • 9 Ibeas-Lopez J. New technology: heparin and antimicrobial-coated catheters. J Vasc Access 2015; 16 (Suppl. 09) S48-S53
  • 10 Cho SK, Shin SW, Do YS, Park KB, Choo SW, Choo IW. Use of the right external jugular vein as the preferred access site when the right internal jugular vein is not usable. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2006; 17 (5) 823-829
  • 11 Trerotola SO, Kuhn-Fulton J, Johnson MS, Shah H, Ambrosius WT, Kneebone PH. Tunneled infusion catheters: increased incidence of symptomatic venous thrombosis after subclavian versus internal jugular venous access. Radiology 2000; 217 (1) 89-93
  • 12 Vesely TM. Central venous catheter tip position: a continuing controversy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14 (5) 527-534
  • 13 Mahlon MA, Yoon H-C. CT angiography of the superior vena cava: normative values and implications for central venous catheter position. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2007; 18 (9) 1106-1110
  • 14 Baskin KM, Jimenez RM, Cahill AM, Jawad AF, Towbin RB. Cavoatrial junction and central venous anatomy: implications for central venous access tip position. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2008; 19 (3) 359-365
  • 15 Bhutta ST, Culp WC. Evaluation and management of central venous access complications. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2011; 14 (4) 217-224
  • 16 Bagwell CE, Salzberg AM, Sonnino RE, Haynes JH. Potentially lethal complications of central venous catheter placement. J Pediatr Surg 2000; 35 (5) 709-713
  • 17 McGee WT, Mailloux PT, Martin RT. Safe placement of central venous catheters: a measured approach. J Intensive Care Med 2011; 26 (6) 392-396
  • 18 Aslam S, Vaida F, Ritter M, Mehta RL. Systematic review and meta-analysis on management of hemodialysis catheter-related bacteremia. J Am Soc Nephrol 2014; 25 (12) 2927-2941
  • 19 Beathard GA, Urbanes A. Infection associated with tunneled hemodialysis catheters. Semin Dial 2008; 21 (6) 528-538
  • 20 Miller DL, O'Grady NP. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections: recommendations relevant to interventional radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14 (2, Pt 1): 133-136
  • 21 Forauer AR, Theoharis CG, Dasika NL. Jugular vein catheter placement: histologic features and development of catheter-related (fibrin) sheaths in a swine model. Radiology 2006; 240 (2) 427-434
  • 22 Janne d'Othée B, Tham JC, Sheiman RG. Restoration of patency in failing tunneled hemodialysis catheters: a comparison of catheter exchange, exchange and balloon disruption of the fibrin sheath, and femoral stripping. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2006; 17 (6) 1011-1015
  • 23 Malas MB, Canner JK, Hicks CW , et al. Trends in incident hemodialysis access and mortality. JAMA Surg 2015; 150 (5) 441-448