PDF herunterladen
Semin Reprod Med 2016; 34(03): 133-138
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1571439
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Contraception Counseling in the Digital Age

Allison Linton
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
,
Cassing Hammond
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
04. März 2016 (online)

    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

The digital age has revolutionized how providers and patients seek medical information and access care. The Internet, flush with online forums and other social media networks, has replaced services once provided by medical libraries. Meanwhile, downloadable apps help patients remember medications, choose treatments, and remotely access face-to-face physician encounters. Unfortunately, technology comes at a price. Reputable, data-driven sites exist alongside sites riddled with inaccuracies. The lack of peer review means that discredited ideas and therapies can resurface in the blogosphere, “going viral” and influencing the thoughts of hapless users. The Internet never forgets. Online media and digital technology pose unique challenges to family planning providers. The “net” offers a private environment to address sexual and reproductive health issues. Patients, especially adolescents, may prefer the anonymity of technology-based sources to consulting physicians or other community providers, but they may receive inaccurate information or information that fails to consider the psychosocial context of reproductive behavior. Family planning providers must become familiar with reputable technology-based options to ensure that family planning care remains accurate, accessible, and relevant in the ever-changing digital age.

Keywords

Internet - social media - digital technologies - contraception counseling
 

  • References

  • 1 Leiner BM, Clark DD, Kahn RE , et al. A Brief History of the Internet. Internet Society. 2012. Available at: http://www.Internetsociety.org/brief-history-Internet
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Shortliffe EH. The next generation Internet and health care: a civics lesson for the informatics community. Proc AMIA Symp 1998; 8-14
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 World Bank Group. Internet Users (per 100 people). World Bank Group. 2015. Available at: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IT.NET.USER.P2
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Stats IL. Internet Users in the World. Internet Live Stats. 2015. Available at: http://www.Internetlivestats.com/Internet-users/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ventola CL. Social media and health care professionals: benefits, risks, and best practices. P T 2014; 39 (7) 491-520
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Griffis HM, Kilaru AS, Werner RM , et al. Use of social media across US hospitals: descriptive analysis of adoption and utilization. J Med Internet Res 2014; 16 (11) e264
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 McGowan BS, Wasko M, Vartabedian BS, Miller RS, Freiherr DD, Abdolrasulnia M. Understanding the factors that influence the adoption and meaningful use of social media by physicians to share medical information. J Med Internet Res 2012; 14 (5) e117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Pew Research Center. Health Fact Sheet. Pew Research Center. 2015. Available at: http://www.pewInternet.org/fact-sheets/health-fact-sheet/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 PricewaterhouseCooper Health Research Center. Social Media “Likes” Healthcare: From Marketing to Social Business. Delaware: PricewaterhouseCooper; 2012
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Isaac T, Zheng J, Jha A. Use of UpToDate and outcomes in US hospitals. J Hosp Med 2012; 7 (2) 85-90
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Gainer E, Sollet C, Ulmann M, Lévy D, Ulmann A. Surfing on the morning after: analysis of an emergency contraception website. Contraception 2003; 67 (3) 195-199
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Wynn L, Trussell J. The morning after on the internet: usage of and questions to the emergency contraception website. Contraception 2005; 72 (1) 5-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ely JW, Osheroff JA, Chambliss ML, Ebell MH, Rosenbaum ME. Answering physicians' clinical questions: obstacles and potential solutions. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005; 12 (2) 217-224
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Jones RK, Biddlecom AE. Is the internet filling the sexual health information gap for teens? An exploratory study. J Health Commun 2011; 16 (2) 112-123
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Ely JW, Osheroff JA, Ebell MH , et al. Obstacles to answering doctors' questions about patient care with evidence: qualitative study. BMJ 2002; 324 (7339) 710
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Fox S. Who Doesn't Gather Information Online. Pew Research Center. 2011. Available at: http://www.pewInternet.org/2011/10/18/who-doesnt-gather-health-information-online/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Berland GK, Elliott MN, Morales LS , et al. Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. JAMA 2001; 285 (20) 2612-2621
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Neumark Y, Flum L, Lopez-Quintero C, Shtarkshall R. Quality of online health information about oral contraceptives from Hebrew-language websites. Isr J Health Policy Res 2012; 1 (1) 38
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Levy K, Minnis AM, Lahiff M, Schmittdiel J, Dehlendorf C. Bringing patients' social context into the examination room: an investigation of the discussion of social influence during contraceptive counseling. Womens Health Issues 2015; 25 (1) 13-21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Sedgh G, Singh S, Hussain R. Intended and unintended pregnancies worldwide in 2012 and recent trends. Stud Fam Plann 2014; 45 (3) 301-314
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Finer LB, Zolna MR. Unintended pregnancy in the United States: incidence and disparities, 2006. Contraception 2011; 84 (5) 478-485
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Finer LB, Zolna MR. Shifts in intended and unintended pregnancies in the United States, 2001-2008. Am J Public Health 2014; 104 (Suppl. 01) S43-S48
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Frost JJ, Darroch JE, Remez L. Improving contraceptive use in the United States. Issues Brief (Alan Guttmacher Inst) 2008; (1) 1-8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ , et al. Births: final data for 2009. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2011; 60 (1) 1-70
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Donnelly KZ, Foster TC, Thompson R. What matters most? The content and concordance of patients' and providers' information priorities for contraceptive decision making. Contraception 2014; 90 (3) 280-287
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Dehlendorf C, Levy K, Kelley A, Grumbach K, Steinauer J. Women's preferences for contraceptive counseling and decision making. Contraception 2013; 88 (2) 250-256
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Lindberg LD, Santelli JS, Singh S. Changes in formal sex education: 1995-2002. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2006; 38 (4) 182-189
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Ott MA, Santelli JS. Abstinence and abstinence-only education. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2007; 19 (5) 446-452
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. School Health Policies and Practices Study 2014. Atlanta, GA: CDC; 2015
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Yee L, Simon M. Urban minority women's perceptions of and preferences for postpartum contraceptive counseling. J Midwifery Womens Health 2011; 56 (1) 54-60
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Gressel GM, Lundsberg LS, Illuzzi JL , et al. Patient and provider perspectives on Bedsider.org, an online contraceptive information tool, in a low income, racially diverse clinic population. Contraception 2014; 90 (6) 588-593
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Garbers S, Meserve A, Kottke M, Hatcher R, Ventura A, Chiasson MA. Randomized controlled trial of a computer-based module to improve contraceptive method choice. Contraception 2012; 86 (4) 383-390
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Kofinas JD, Varrey A, Sapra KJ, Kanj RV, Chervenak FA, Asfaw T. Adjunctive social media for more effective contraceptive counseling: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123 (4) 763-770
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Giorgio MM, Kantor LM, Levine DS, Arons W. Using chat and text technologies to answer sexual and reproductive health questions: Planned Parenthood pilot study. J Med Internet Res 2013; 15 (9) e203
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Castaño PM, Bynum JY, Andrés R, Lara M, Westhoff C. Effect of daily text messages on oral contraceptive continuation: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 119 (1) 14-20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Hall KS, Westhoff CL, Castaño PM. The impact of an educational text message intervention on young urban women's knowledge of oral contraception. Contraception 2013; 87 (4) 449-454
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Stevenson AJ. Finding the Twitter users who stood with Wendy. Contraception 2014; 90 (5) 502-507
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Altshuler AL, Gerns Storey HL, Prager SW. Exploring abortion attitudes of US adolescents and young adults using social media. Contraception 2015; 91 (3) 226-233
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar