The Influence of a Crosshair Visual Aid on Observer Detection of Simulated Fetal Heart Rate Signals

Abstract

Objective To determine whether a visual aid overlaid on fetal heart rate (FHR) tracings increases detection of critical signals relative to images with no visual aid.

Study Design In an experimental study, 21 undergraduate students viewed 240 images of simulated FHR tracings twice, once with the visual aids and once without aids. Performance was examined for images containing three different types of FHR signals (early deceleration, late deceleration, and acceleration) and four different FHR signal-to-noise ratios corresponding to FHR variability types (absent, minimal, moderate, and marked) identified by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (2008). Performance was analyzed using repeated-measures analyses of variance.

Results The presence of the visual aid significantly improved correct detections of signals overall and decreased false alarms for the marked variability condition.

Conclusion The results of the study provide evidence that the presence of a visual aid was useful in helping novices identify FHR signals in simulated maternal-fetal heart rate images. Further, the visual aid was most useful for conditions in which the signal is most difficult to detect (when FHR variability is highest).

Keywords

maternal-fetal heart rate monitoring - signal detection - visual aid - fetal heart rate

• References

• 1 Miller DA, Miller LA. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: applying principles of patient safety. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206 (4) 278-283
• 2 Macones GA, Hankins GD, Spong CY, Hauth J, Moore T. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112 (3) 661-666
• 3 Belfore II LA, Scerbo MW, Anderson BL. A fetal heart rate monitor simulator. In: Proceedings from ModSim World September 2004; Virginia Beach, VA
• 4 Anderson BL, Scerbo MW, Belfore II LA, Abuhamad A. When is a deceleration perceived as a late deceleration?. Simul Healthc 2010; 4: 311
• 5 Anderson BL, Scerbo MW, Belfore II LA, Abuhamad AZ, Davis SS. Can clinicians tell when a decel is a late decel? In: 11th International Meeting on Simulation in Healthcare. New Orleans, LA: Society for Simulation in Healthcare; 2011
• 6 Kennedy RA, Anderson-Montoya BL, Scerbo MW , et al. The influence of visual aids on detecting early and late decelerations in maternal-fetal heart rate patterns. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 56th Annual Meeting. Boston, MA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society; 2012:1317–1321
• 7 Anderson BL, Scerbo MW, Belfore II LA, Abuhamad A. Detecting critical patterns in maternal-fetal heart rate signals. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 52nd Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society; 2008:1478–1482
• 8 Chaney FB, Teel KS. Improving inspector performance through training and visual aids. J Appl Psychol 1967; 51 (4) 311-315
• 9 Posner ML, Nissen MJ, Ogden WC. Attended and unattended processing modes: the role of set for spatial location. In: Pick JHI, Saltzman E, eds. Modes of perceiving and processing information. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1978: 137-157
• 10 Hall LM, Hannon DJ, Leisk GG, Wolfberg AJ, House MD. Measurement of fetal heart rate variability on an electronic monitor using a prototype electronic ruler. Am J Perinatol 2012; 29 (6) 409-413