Application of Reverse Anterolateral Thigh Flap in Infected Knee Defect Reconstruction in a Pediatric Patient with Developmental Disability

Development of the microsurgical technique and knowledge of vascular anatomy has led to a high success rate and good results in pediatric free flap reconstruction. However, in free flap reconstruction in pediatric patients, there is difficulty in flap dissection and vessel anastomosis because of the small size of the vessels and the tendency of vasospasm.[1] [2] In addition, in uncooperative patients with mental and developmental disability, disastrous results can occur postoperatively.

Reconstruction of the soft tissue defect of the knee remains difficult and challenging and becomes even more difficult in defects accompanied by infection. This is because local available tissues are often unhealthy and not sufficient to cover the large defect.[3] [4] Some reconstructive options have been introduced so far, including local muscle flap, reverse anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap, and free flap. In the free flap, major vessels are usually located deeply, requiring meticulous and tedious dissection which can result in injury to major vessel and requiring a long operation time.[3] [5] [6] Also, with a local muscle flap, there is relevant donor-site morbidity including contour deformity.[3]

ALT flap, one of the most popular flaps, has been used as a pedicled or free flap with a wide variety of clinical applications.[5] [6] [7] [8] Despite some reports on efficacy of reconstruction using ALT free flap in pediatric foot and ankle defects,[2] few cases of reverse ALT flaps successfully transferred for reconstruction of soft tissue defects of the knee have been reported. Therefore, we reconstructed an infected soft tissue knee defect in a pediatric patient, who had no cooperation capability due to mental and developmental disability, using reverse ALT flap and report the case.

• References

• 1 Song JW, Ben-Nakhi M, Hong JP. Reconstruction of lower extremity with perforator free flaps by free style approach in pediatric patients. J Reconstr Microsurg 2012; 28 (9) 589-594
• 2 Acar MA, Güleç A, Aydin BK, Erkoçak ÖF, Yilmaz G, Şenaran H. Reconstruction of foot and ankle defects with a free anterolateral thigh flap in pediatric patients. J Reconstr Microsurg 2015; 31 (3) 225-232
• 3 Hong JP, Koshima I. Using perforators as recipient vessels (supermicrosurgery) for free flap reconstruction of the knee region. Ann Plast Surg 2010; 64 (3) 291-293
• 4 Kim SW, Hwang KT, Kim JD, Kim YH. Reconstruction of postinfected scalp defects using latissimus dorsi perforator and myocutaneous free flaps. J Craniofac Surg 2012; 23 (6) 1615-1619
• 5 Lin F, Wong M, Chew KY, Tan BK. Incorporating a racket-handle skin bridge and venous supercharging to improve reliability of the distally based anterolateral thigh flap. Arch Plast Surg 2015; 42 (2) 240-241
• 6 Erba P, Raffoul W, Bauquis O. Safe dissection of the distally based anterolateral thigh flap. J Reconstr Microsurg 2012; 28 (6) 405-411
• 7 Bhadkamkar MA, Wolfswinkel EM, Hatef DA , et al. The ultra-thin, fascia-only anterolateral thigh flap. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; 30 (9) 599-606
• 8 Nosrati N, Chao AH, Chang DW, Yu P. Lower extremity reconstruction with the anterolateral thigh flap. J Reconstr Microsurg 2012; 28 (4) 227-234