Impact of Standardized Communication Techniques on Errors during Simulated Neonatal Resuscitation

Abstract

Aim Current patterns of communication in high-risk clinical situations, such as resuscitation, are imprecise and prone to error. We hypothesized that the use of standardized communication techniques would decrease the errors committed by resuscitation teams during neonatal resuscitation.

Methods In a prospective, single-blinded, matched pairs design with block randomization, 13 subjects performed as a lead resuscitator in two simulated complex neonatal resuscitations. Two nurses assisted each subject during the simulated resuscitation scenarios. In one scenario, the nurses used nonstandard communication; in the other, they used standardized communication techniques. The performance of the subjects was scored to determine errors committed (defined relative to the Neonatal Resuscitation Program algorithm), time to initiation of positive pressure ventilation (PPV), and time to initiation of chest compressions (CC).

Results In scenarios in which subjects were exposed to standardized communication techniques, there was a trend toward decreased error rate, time to initiation of PPV, and time to initiation of CC. While not statistically significant, there was a 1.7-second improvement in time to initiation of PPV and a 7.9-second improvement in time to initiation of CC.

Conclusions Should these improvements in human performance be replicated in the care of real newborn infants, they could improve patient outcomes and enhance patient safety.

Keywords

neonatal resuscitation - communication - resuscitation lexicon - errors

• References

• 1 American Academy of Pediatrics. Textbook of Neonatal Resuscitation. 6th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2011: 2
• 2 Thomas EJ, Sexton JB, Lasky RE, Helmreich RL, Crandell DS, Tyson J. Teamwork and quality during neonatal care in the delivery room. J Perinatol 2006; 26 (3) 163-169
• 3 Carbine DN, Finer NN, Knodel E, Rich W. Video recording as a means of evaluating neonatal resuscitation performance. Pediatrics 2000; 106 (4) 654-658
• 4 The Joint Commission. Sentinel Event Statistics Data–Root Causes by Event Type (2004–Q2 2015). Published August 26, 2015. Available at: http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/Root_Causes _Event_Type_2004-2Q_2015.pdf . Accessed October 10, 2015
• 5 Chan PS, Krumholz HM, Nichol G, Nallamothu BK ; American Heart Association National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Investigators. Delayed time to defibrillation after in-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 2008; 358 (1) 9-17
• 6 Billings CE, Reynard WD. Dimensions of the information transfer problem. In: Billings CE, Cheaney ES, eds. Information Transfer Problems in the Aviation System (NASA Technical Paper 1875; pp. 9–15). Moffett Field, CA: NASA-Ames Research Center; 1981
• 7 Aviation Safety. Statistical summary of commercial jet airplane accidents: Worldwide operations 1959–2012. Available at: http://www.boeing.com/news/techissues/pdf/statsum.pdf . Accessed September 20, 2014
• 8 Hunziker S, Johansson AC, Tschan F , et al. Teamwork and leadership in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57 (24) 2381-2388
• 9 Mancini ME, Soar J, Bhanji F , et al; Education, Implementation, and Teams Chapter Collaborators. Part 12: Education, implementation, and teams: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. Circulation 2010; 122 (16) (Suppl. 02) S539-S581
• 10 Brindley PG, Reynolds SF. Improving verbal communication in critical care medicine. J Crit Care 2011; 26 (2) 155-159
• 11 Marsch SC, Müller C, Marquardt K, Conrad G, Tschan F, Hunziker PR. Human factors affect the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in simulated cardiac arrests. Resuscitation 2004; 60 (1) 51-56
• 12 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. TeamSTEPPS fundamental course: Module 3. Communication. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/education/curriculum-tools/teamstepps/instructor/fundamentals/module3/igcommunication.html . Accessed Month DD, YYYY
• 13 Yamada NK, Halamek LP. Communication during resuscitation: time for a change?. Resuscitation 2014; 85 (12) e191-e192
• 14 Yamada NK, Halamek LP. On the need for precise, concise communication during resuscitation: a proposed solution. J Pediatr 2015; 166 (1) 184-187
• 15 Nevile M. Beyond the Black Box: Talk-In-Interaction in the Airline Cockpit. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company; 2004: 9-11
• 16 Finer NN, Horbar JD, Carpenter JH. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the very low birth weight infant: the Vermont Oxford Network experience. Pediatrics 1999; 104 (3 Pt 1): 428-434
• 17 Shah PS, Shah P, Tai KFY. Chest compression and/or epinephrine at birth for preterm infants <32 weeks gestational age: matched cohort study of neonatal outcomes. J Perinatol 2009; 29 (10) 693-697
• 18 Shah PS. Extensive cardiopulmonary resuscitation for VLBW and ELBW infants: a systematic review and meta-analyses. J Perinatol 2009; 29 (10) 655-661
• 19 Wyckoff MH, Salhab WA, Heyne RJ, Kendrick DE, Stoll BJ, Laptook AR ; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Outcome of extremely low birth weight infants who received delivery room cardiopulmonary resuscitation. J Pediatr 2012; 160 (2) 239-244.e2
• 20 Sarter NB, Alexander HM. Error types and related error detection mechanisms in the aviation domain: An analysis of aviation safety reporting system incident reports. Int J Aviat Psychol 2000; 10 (2) 189-206