Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2016; 124(03): 148-156
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1565177
Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Fasting C-peptide and Related Parameters Characterizing Insulin Secretory Capacity for Correctly Classifying Diabetes Type and for Predicting Insulin Requirement in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

F. S. Becht
1   Diabeteszentrum Bad Lauterberg (Harz), Germany (where work was performed)
,
K. Walther
1   Diabeteszentrum Bad Lauterberg (Harz), Germany (where work was performed)
,
E. Martin
1   Diabeteszentrum Bad Lauterberg (Harz), Germany (where work was performed)
,
M. A. Nauck
1   Diabeteszentrum Bad Lauterberg (Harz), Germany (where work was performed)
2   Division of Diabetology, ST. Josef Hospital, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany (address for correspondence)
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 03 June 2015
first decision 26 October 2015

accepted 28 October 2015

Publication Date:
29 January 2016 (online)

Abstract

Background/aims: C-peptide allows estimation of insulin secretion even in the presence of insulin treatment. C-peptide may be suitable for the differential diagnosis of type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and, within type 2 diabetes, of insulin-requiring vs. non-insulin-requiring patients. Relating C-peptide concentrations to ambient glucose levels might improve its diagnostic potential.

Patients/methods: The diagnostic value (a) fasting C-peptide, (b) C-peptide/glucose ratios, and (c) the HOMA-ßC-peptide-index for predicting a diagnosis of type 1 (vs. type 2) diabetes were assessed. Setting: Specialised hospital for the care of diabetic patients (inpatient treatment). 303 patients with type 1 diabetes and 841 patients with type 2 diabetes. Main outcome measure: Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for a clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes or for insulin treatment by deciles of (a) fasting C-peptide, (b) C-peptide/glucose ratios, and (c) HOMA-ßC-peptide-index.

Results: Low C-peptide concentrations were associated with a high odds ratio for type 1 diabetes and vice versa (p<0.0001). Concentrations of 0.13–0.36 nmol/l did not discriminate. C-peptide/glucose ratios or HOMA-ßC-Peptide did not perform better. The ability of all 3 parameters to predict the necessity for insulin treatment within the population of type 2-diabetic patients was low.

Conclusions: Fasting C-peptide and derived parameters help to differentiate type 1 from type 2 diabetes, but there is a range of C-peptide concentrations that does not help discriminate. Relating C-peptide to glucose did not improve diagnostic accuracy. C-peptide does not help predicting a need for insulin treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Supplementary Material

 
  • References

  • 1 Steiner DF, Cho S, Oyer PE et al. Isolation and characterization of proinsulin C-peptide from bovine pancreas. The Journal of biological chemistry 1971; 246: 1365-1374
  • 2 Rubenstein AH, Block MB, Starr J et al. Proinsulin and C-peptide in blood. Diabetes 1972; 21 Suppl 661-672
  • 3 Melani F, Rubenstein AH, Oyer PE et al. Identification of proinsulin and C-peptide in human serum by a specific immunoassay. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1970; 67: 148-155
  • 4 Horwitz DL, Starr JI, Mako ME et al. Proinsulin, insulin, and C-peptide concentrations in human portal and peripheral blood. The Journal of clinical investigation 1975; 55: 1278-1283
  • 5 Klinke 2nd DJ. Age-corrected beta cell mass following onset of type 1 diabetes mellitus correlates with plasma C-peptide in humans. PloS one 2011; 6: e26873 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026873.
  • 6 Malka D, Hammel P, Sauvanet A et al. Risk factors for diabetes mellitus in chronic pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 2000; 119: 1324-1332
  • 7 Larsen S. Diabetes mellitus secondary to chronic pancreatitis. Danish medical bulletin 1993; 40: 153-162
  • 8 Relimpio F, Losada F, Pumar A et al. Relationships of C-peptide levels and the C-peptide/bloodsugar ratio with clinical/biochemical variables associated with insulin resistance in orally-treated, well-controlled type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes research and clinical practice 1997; 36: 173-180
  • 9 Weyer C, Bogardus C, Mott DM et al. The natural history of insulin secretory dysfunction and insulin resistance in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The Journal of clinical investigation 1999; 104: 787-794 DOI: 10.1172/JCI7231.
  • 10 Grill V, Bjorklund A. Type 2 diabetes – effect of compensatory oversecretion as a reason for beta-cell collapse. International journal of experimental diabetes research 2002; 3: 153-158
  • 11 Welborn TA, Garcia-Webb P, Bonser AM. Basal C-peptide in the dicrimination of type I from type II diabetes. Diabetes care 1981; 4: 616-619
  • 12 Katzeff HL, Savage PJ, Barclay-White B et al. C-peptide measurement in the differentiation of type 1 (insulin-dependent) and type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 1985; 28: 264-268
  • 13 Cravarezza P, Radaeli E, Toffoli C et al. Discrimination of type I from insulin-treated type II diabetic patients by C-peptide measurement. Acta diabetologica latina 1986; 23: 345-350
  • 14 Gjessing HJ, Matzen LE, Faber OK et al. Fasting plasma C-peptide, glucagon stimulated plasma C-peptide, and urinary C-peptide in relation to clinical type of diabetes. Diabetologia 1989; 32: 305-311
  • 15 Service FJ, Rizza RA, Zimmerman BR et al. The classification of diabetes by clinical and C-peptide criteria. A prospective population-based study. Diabetes care 1997; 20: 198-201
  • 16 Polonsky KS, Sturis J, Bell GI. Seminars in Medicine of the Beth Israel Hospital. Boston. Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus-a genetically programmed failure of the beta cell to compensate for insulin resistance. The New England journal of medicine 1996; 334: 777-783 DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199603213341207.
  • 17 Meier JJ, Menge BA, Breuer TG et al. Functional assessment of pancreatic beta-cell area in humans. Diabetes 2009; 58: 1595-1603 DOI: 10.2337/db08-1611.
  • 18 Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS et al. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia 1985; 28: 412-419
  • 19 Wallace TM, Levy JC, Matthews DR. Use and abuse of HOMA modeling. Diabetes care 2004; 27: 1487-1495
  • 20 Bonora E, Targher G, Alberiche M et al. Homeostasis model assessment closely mirrors the glucose clamp technique in the assessment of insulin sensitivity: studies in subjects with various degrees of glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity. Diabetes care 2000; 23: 57-63
  • 21 [Anonymous]. http://labmed.ucsf.edu/labmanual/db/resource/proc-Centaur_C-Peptide_Rev_F.pdf
  • 22 Conrad K, Roggenbuck D, Reinhold D et al. Autoantibody diagnostics in clinical practice. Autoimmun Rev 2012; 11: 207-211 DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2011.05.014.
  • 23 Reghina AD, Florea S, Constantin M et al. The Impact of Thyroid Autoimmunity on the Clinical and Diabetes Parameters of Patients with Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Adults. Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes: official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association 2015; DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1555764.