Download PDF
Semin Hear 2015; 36(04): 216-236
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1564457
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Results from a National Central Auditory Processing Disorder Service: A Real-World Assessment of Diagnostic Practices and Remediation for Central Auditory Processing Disorder

Sharon Cameron
1   National Acoustic Laboratories, Macquarie University, NSW, Australia
,
Helen Glyde
1   National Acoustic Laboratories, Macquarie University, NSW, Australia
,
Harvey Dillon
1   National Acoustic Laboratories, Macquarie University, NSW, Australia
,
Alison King
2   Australian Hearing, Macquarie University, NSW, Australia.
,
Karin Gillies
2   Australian Hearing, Macquarie University, NSW, Australia.
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
26 October 2015 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

This article describes the development and evaluation of a national service to diagnose and remediate central auditory processing disorder (CAPD). Data were gathered from 38 participating Australian Hearing centers over an 18-month period from 666 individuals age 6, 0 (years, months) to 24, 8 (median 9, 0). A total of 408 clients were diagnosed with either a spatial processing disorder (n = 130), a verbal memory deficit (n = 174), or a binaural integration deficit (n = 104). A hierarchical test protocol was used so not all children were assessed on all tests in the battery. One hundred fifty clients decided to proceed with deficit-specific training (LiSN & Learn or Memory Booster) and/or be fitted with a frequency modulation system. Families were provided with communication strategies targeted to a child's specific listening difficulties and goals. Outcomes were measured using repeat assessment of the relevant diagnostic test, as well as the Client Oriented Scale of Improvement measure and Listening Inventories for Education teacher questionnaire. Group analyses revealed significant improvements postremediation for all training/management options. Individual posttraining performance and results of outcome measures also are discussed.

Keywords

Central auditory processing disorder - spatial processing disorder - deficit-specific auditory training
 

  • References

  • 1 Australian Hearing. CAPD service offered by Australian. Available at: http://www.hearing.com.au/capd-service-offered-australian-hearing/ 2013 . Accessed September 10, 2015
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Musiek F, Chermak G. Preface. In: Chermak GD, Musiek FE, eds. Handbook of Central Auditory Processing Disorder. Comprehensive Intervention. Vol. I. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing; 2014: xi-xiii
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Cameron S, Dillon H. Remediation of spatial processing issues in central auditory processing disorder. In Chermak GD, Musiek FE, eds. Handbook of Central Auditory Processing Disorder. Comprehensive Intervention. Vol. II. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing; 2014: 201-224
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Brown DK, Cameron S, Martin JS, Watson C, Dillon H. The North American Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences test (NA LiSN-S): normative data and test-retest reliability studies for adolescents and young adults. J Am Acad Audiol 2010; 21 (10) 629-641
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Cameron S, Brown D, Keith R, Martin J, Watson C, Dillon H. Development of the North American Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences test (NA LiSN-S): sentence equivalence, normative data, and test-retest reliability studies. J Am Acad Audiol 2009; 20 (2) 128-146
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Cameron S, Dillon H. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S). Ear Hear 2007; 28 (2) 196-211
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Cameron S, Dillon H. The listening in spatialized noise-sentences test (LISN-S): test-retest reliability study. Int J Audiol 2007; 46 (3) 145-153
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Cameron S, Dillon H. The listening in spatialized noise-sentences test (LISN-S): comparison to the prototype LISN and results from children with either a suspected (central) auditory processing disorder or a confirmed language disorder. J Am Acad Audiol 2008; 19 (5) 377-391
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Cameron S, Dillon H. Listening in Spatialized Noise–Sentences test (LISN-S) (Version 2.003) [Computer software]. Murten, Switzerland: Phonak Communications AG; 2009
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Cameron S, Glyde H, Dillon H. Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LiSN-S): normative and retest reliability data for adolescents and adults up to 60 years of age. J Am Acad Audiol 2011; 22 (10) 697-709
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Cameron S, Dillon H, Glyde H, Kanthan S, Kania A. Prevalence and remediation of spatial processing disorder (SPD) in indigenous children in regional Australia. Int J Audiol 2014; 53 (5) 326-335
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Tomlin D, Rance G. Long-term hearing deficits after childhood middle ear disease. Ear Hear 2014; 35 (6) e233-e242
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Cameron S, Dillon H. LISN & Learn Auditory Training Software (Version 3.0.0) [Computer software]. Sydney, Australia: National Acoustic Laboratories; 2012
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Cameron S, Dillon H. Development and evaluation of the LiSN & learn auditory training software for deficit-specific remediation of binaural processing deficits in children: preliminary findings. J Am Acad Audiol 2011; 22 (10) 678-696
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Cameron S, Glyde H, Dillon H. Efficacy of the LiSN & Learn auditory training software: randomized blinded controlled study. Audiol Res 2012; 2: e15
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Dillon H, Cameron S, Glyde H, Wilson W, Tomlin D. An opinion on the assessment of people who may have an auditory processing disorder. J Am Acad Audiol 2012; 23 (2) 97-105
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Tomlin D, Dillon H, Sharma M, Rance G. The impact of auditory processing and cognitive abilities in children. Ear Hear 2015; 35 (6) 233-242
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Keith WJ, Purdy SC. Assistive and therapeutic effects of amplification for auditory processing disorder. Semin Hear 2014; 35 (1) 27-38
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Hornickel J, Zecker SG, Bradlow AR, Kraus N. Assistive listening devices drive neuroplasticity in children with dyslexia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012; 109 (41) 16731-16736
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Martin N, Brownell R. Test of Auditory Processing Skills. 3rd ed. Novato, CA: Academic Therapy Publications; 2005
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Wilson RH, Strouse A. Tonal & speech materials for auditory perceptual assessment (Disc 2.0) [CD]. Mountain Home, TN: VA Medical Centres; 1998
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Singer J, Hurley RM, Preece JP. Effectiveness of central auditory processing tests with children. Am J Audiol 1998; 7 (2) 73-84
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Ahmmed AU, Ahmmed AA, Bath JR, Ferguson MA, Plack CJ, Moore DR. Assessment of children with suspected auditory processing disorder: a factor analysis study. Ear Hear 2014; 35 (3) 295-305
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Bryden MP. Order of report in dichotic listening. Can J Psychol 1962; 16 (14) 291-299
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Lawfield A, McFarland DJ, Cacace AT. Dichotic and dichoptic digit perception in normal adults. J Am Acad Audiol 2011; 22 (6) 332-341
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Maerlender AC, Wallis DJ, Isquith PK. Psychometric and behavioral measures of central auditory function: the relationship between dichotic listening and digit span tasks. Child Neuropsychol 2004; 10 (4) 318-327
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Leedale R, Singleton C, Thomas K. Memory Booster [Computer software]. East Yorkshire, UK: Lucid Innovations Ltd; 2008
    Google Scholar
  • 28 NAL. COSI-C: Client Oriented Scale of Improvement for Children. Available at: http://www.nal.gov.au/outcome-measures_tab_cosi.shtml . Accessed September 29, 2015
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Anderson KL, Smaldino JJ. Listening Inventory for Education: An Efficacy Tool—Teacher Appraisal of Listening Difficulty. Tampa, FL: Educational Audiology Association; 1998
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Anderson KL, Smaldino JJ. Listening inventories for education: a classroom measurement tool. Hear J 1999; 52 (10) 74-76
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 St Clair-Thompson H, Stevens R, Hunt A, Bolder E. Improving children's working memory and classroom performance. Educ Psychol 2010; 30 (2) 203-219
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Doran GT. There's a S.M.A.R.T. way to write management's goals and objectives. Manage Rev 1981; 70 (11) 35-36
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Dillon H. Hearing Aids. Turramurra, Australia: Boomerang Press; 2012
    Google Scholar