Download PDF
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2015; 75(11): 1161-1166
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1558250
Original Article
GebFra Science
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Clinical Study: Change in Outlook Towards Birth After a Midwife Led Antenatal Education Programme Versus Hypnoreflexogenous Self-Hypnosis Training for Childbirth

Klinische Studie: Veränderung der mütterlichen Einstellung auf die Geburt durch einen Hebammen-geführten Geburtsvorbereitungskurs im Vergleich mit der hypnoreflexogenen Geburtsvorbereitung
L. A. Streibert
2   Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Frankfurt am Main
,
J. Reinhard
1   St. Marienkrankenhaus, Frauenklinik, Frankfurt
,
J. Yuan
2   Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Frankfurt am Main
,
S. Schiermeier
3   University Witten/Herdecke, Marien-Hospital Witten, Witten
,
F. Louwen
2   Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Frankfurt am Main
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 15 April 2015
revised 15 September 2015

accepted 18 October 2015

Publication Date:
14 December 2015 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Aim: To compare the change of maternal outlook towards birth due to a midwife led antenatal education programme versus hypnoreflexogenous self-hypnosis training for childbirth. Method: Before beginning of the classes and after the last class maternal perception on birth was evaluated using Osgood semantic differential questionnaire. The Gießen personality score was evaluated once. Results: 213 patients were enrolled in this study. 155 were in the midwife led education programme and 58 in the self-hypnosis training programme. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in regard of participantsʼ characteristics, Gießen personality score and initial Osgood semantic differential scores. After the midwife led course childbirth was emotionally more negatively scored (displeasure, tarnishing, dimension evaluation [p < 0.05]), whereas after the hypnosis course childbirth was emotionally more positively evaluated (pleasure, harmony, dimension evaluation [p < 0.01] and brightness [p < 0.05]). Summary: In this study hypnoreflexogenous self-hypnosis training resulted in a positive maternal outlook towards childbirth, in comparison to the midwife led course. Further prospective randomised studies are required to test these initial results.

Zusammenfassung

Ziel: Vergleich der Veränderung der mütterlichen Einstellung zur Geburt anhand von Hebammen-geführten Geburtsvorbereitungskursen oder hypnoreflexogenem Training zur Geburtsvorbereitung. Methode: Zu Beginn und nach Beendigung der Kurse wurde die mütterliche Einstellung zur Geburt unter Zuhilfenahme des Osgood-Ertel-Eindrucksdifferenzials gemessen. Der Gießen-Test zur Persönlichkeitsbeurteilung wurde einmalig angewendet. Ergebnisse: 213 Frauen waren in die Studie eingeschlossen. 155 davon nahmen an Hebammen-geführten Kursen teil und 58 bekamen hypnoreflexogenes Training. Es waren zu Beginn der Kurse keine statistisch signifikanten Unterschiede feststellbar in Bezug auf die Charakteristiken der Teilnehmerinnen, im Gießen-Test und in den Ergebnissen des Osgood-Ertel-Eindrucksdifferenzials. Nach der Hebammen-geführten Geburtsvorbereitung wurde die Geburt negativer wahrgenommen (Freudlosigkeit, Trübung, Valenzdimension [p < 0,05]), während die Geburt nach dem Hypnosetraining emotional positiver bewertet wurde (Freude, Harmonie, Valenzdimension [p < 0,01] und Helligkeit [p < 0,05]). Zusammenfassung: Hypnoreflexogenes Selbsthypnosetraining zur Geburtsvorbereitung scheint stärkere und positivere mütterliche emotionale Veränderungen in Bezug auf die Einstellung zur Geburt auszulösen als konventionelle Hebammen-geführte Geburtsvorbereitungskurse. Weitere prospektive randomisierte Studien sind nötig, um diese Ergebnisse zu überprüfen.

Key words

childbirth education - pregnancy education - birth - childbirth fear - hypnosis

Schlüsselwörter

Geburtsvorbereitung - Geburt - Geburtsangst - Hypnose
 

  • References

  • 1 Jaddoe VWV. Antenatal education programmes: do they work?. Lancet 2009; 374: 863-864
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Dave T, Johnson D, Ingram J. Transition to parenthood: the needs of parents in pregnancy and early parentood. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2008; 8: 30
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Fabian HM, Radestad IJ, Waldenstroem U. Childbirth and parenthood education classes in Sweden: womenʼs opinion and possible outcomes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005; 84: 436-443
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Gagnon AJ, Sandall J. Individual or group antenatal education for childbirth or parenthood, or both. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; (3) CD002869
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 OʼMeara CM. Childbirth and parenting education – the providersʼ viewpoint. Midwifery 1993; 9: 76-84
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bergström M, Kieler H, Waldenström U. Effects of natural childbirth preparation versus standard antenatal education on epidural rates, experience of childbirth and parental stress in mothers and fathers: a randomised controlled multicentre trial. BJOG 2009; 116: 1167-1176
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Artieta-Pinedo I, Paz-Pascual C, Grandes G et al. The benefits of antenatal education for the childbirth process in Spain. Nurs Res 2010; 59: 194-202
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Paz-Pascual C, Artieta Pinedo I, Grandes G et al. Design and process of the EMA cohort Study: the value of antenatal education in childbirth and breastfeeding. BMC Nurs 2008; 7: 5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Schauble PG, Werner WE, Rai SH et al. Childbirth preparation through hypnosis: the hypnoreflexogenous protocol. Am J Clin Hypn 1998; 40: 273-283
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Reinhard J, Hüsken-Janssen H, Schiermeier S. [Childbirth preparation through the hypnoreflexogenous protocol developed by Schauble]. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2007; 211: 162-164
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Reinhard J, Hüsken-Janßen H, Hatzmann H et al. Hypnotherapie, Gestationsalter und Frühgeburtenrate. Z Geburtsh Neonatol 2010; 214: 82-87
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Reinhard J, Hüsken-Janßen H, Hatzmann H et al. Hypnotherapie bei vorzeitiger Wehentätigkeit. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2008; 68: 603-606
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Reinhard J, Hüsken-Janßen H, Hatzmann H et al. Evidenzbasierte Hypnotherapie bei Krebspatienten. KIM 2008; 49: 7-12
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Reinhard J, Roesler R, Yuan J et al. Prostaglandin E2 labour induction with intravaginal (Minprostin®) versus intracervical (Prepidil®) at term: randomized study of maternal and neonatal outcome and patientʼs perception using the Osgood semantic differential scales. BioMed Research International 2014; DOI: 10.1155/2014/682919. Online: http://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2014/682919/ Stand: 16.11.2015
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Reinhard J, Heinrich TM, Reitter A et al. Clinical hypnosis before external cephalic version. Am J Clin Hypnos 2012; 55: 184-192
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Reinhard J, Peiffer S, Sänger N et al. The Effects of Clinical Hypnosis versus Neurolinguistic Programming (NLP) before External Cephalic Version (ECV): A Prospective Off-Centre Randomised, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2012; DOI: 10.1155/2012/626740.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Montgomery GH, David D, Winkel G et al. The effectiveness of adjunctive hypnosis with surgical patients: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 1639-1645
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Montgomery GH, Weltz CR, Seltz M et al. Brief presurgery hypnosis reduces distress and pain in excisional breast biopsy patients. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 2002; 50: 17-32
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Werner A, Uldbjerg N, Yachariae R et al. Antenatal hypnosis training and childbirth experience: a randomized controlled trial. Birth 2013; 40: 272-280
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Mehl-Madrona LE. Hypnosis to facilitate uncomplicated birth. Am J Clin Hypn 2004; 46: 299-312
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Freeman RM, Macaulay AJ, Eve L et al. Randomised trial of self hypnosis for analgesia in labour. Br Med J 1986; 292: 657-658
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Cyna AM, Andrew MI, McAuliffe GL. Antenatal self-hypnosis for labour and childbirth: a pilot study. Anaesth Intensive Care 2006; 34: 464-469
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Mairs DAE. Hypnosis and pain in childbirth. Contemporary Hypnosis 1995; 12: 111-118
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Cyna A, Crowther C, Robinson J et al. Hypnosis antenatal training for childbirth: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2013; 120: 1248-1259
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Werner A, Uldbjerg N, Zachariae R et al. Self-hypnosis for coping with labour pain: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2013; 120: 346-353
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Werner A, Uldbjerg N, Zachariae R et al. Effect of self-hypnosis on duration of labor and maternal and neonatal outcomes: a randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013; 92: 816-823
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Osgood CE, Suci GJ, Tannenbaum PH. The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press; 1957
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Ertel S. Standardisierung eines Eindrucksdifferentials. Z exp angew Psychol 1965; 12: 22-58
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Ertel S. Weitere Untersuchungen zur Standardisierung eines Eindrucksdifferentials. Z exp angew Psychol 1965; 12: 177-208
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Zahler E. Frei improvisierte Musik in der Musiktherapie als Medium für Ausdruck und Kommunikation von Emotionen. Eine musikpsychologische Studie zur musiktherapeutischen Grundlagenforschung. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Musiktherapie 2006; Berlin.. Online: http://www.musiktherapie.de/fileadmin/user_upload/medien/pdf/mu_downloads/zahler_frei-improvisierte-musik.pdf Stand: 16.11.2015
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Windemuth D, Stücker M, Altmeyer P. Implizite Persönlichkeitstheorien in der Dermatologie. Hautarzt 2000; 51: 176-181
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Badia A, Meneses J, Monereo C. Affective dimension of university professors about their teaching: an exploration through the semantic differential technique. Universitas Psychologica 2014; 13: 161-173
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Beckmann D, Brähler E, Richter H. Der Gießen-Test (GT). 4. Aufl.. Göttingen: Hogrefe (Vorm. Verlag Hans Huber); 1990
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Dick-Read G. Childbirth without Fear: the Principles and Practice of natural Childbirth. New York, London: Harper and Brothers Publishers; 1994
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Lamaze F. Painless Childbirth: psychoprophylactic Method. London: Burke; 1958
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Lowe NK. The pain and discomfort of labour and birth. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 1996; 25: 82-92
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Waldenstrom U. Experience of labor and birth in 1111 women. J Psychosom Res 1999; 47: 471-482
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Waldenstrom U, Borg IM, Olsson B et al. The childbirth experience: a study of 295 new mothers. Birth 1996; 23: 144-153
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Gottval K, Waldenstrom U. Does a traumatic birth experience have an impact on future reproduction?. BJOG 2002; 109: 254-260
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Creedy DK, Shochet IM, Horsfall J. Childbirth and the development of acute trauma symptoms: incidence and contributing factors. Birth 2000; 27: 104-111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Saisto T, Halmesmaki E. Fear of childbirth: a neglected dilemma. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003; 82: 201-208
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Waldenstrom U, Hildingsson I, Ryding EL. Antenatal fear of childbirth and its association with subsequent caesarean section and experience of childbirth. BJOG 2006; 113: 638-646
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar