Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2016; 33(01): 079-083
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1556884
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Prevalence of Congenital Cutaneous Anomalies in 1000 Newborns and a Review of the Literature

Sezgi Sarikaya Solak
1   Department of Dermatology, Sisli Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
,
Ilknur Kivanc Altunay
1   Department of Dermatology, Sisli Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
,
Gulsen Tukenmez Demirci
2   Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Baskent University, Istanbul Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
,
Burce Can
3   Department of Dermatology, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Goztepe Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

11 March 2015

01 June 2015

Publication Date:
14 July 2015 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective There are limited reports studying on congenital cutaneous anomalies in newborns, particularly in Turkey. Some of congenital cutaneous anomalies serve as an important clue for accompanying syndromes or other medical conditions. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of congenital cutaneous anomalies in newborns and to discuss their clinical significance with a brief review of literature.

Study Design A total of 1,000 newborns were examined by a dermatologist in a hospital-based, cross-sectional, prospective study between October 2011 and April 2012.

Results We observed 11 different congenital cutaneous anomalies in 48 newborns of 1,000 (4.8%). The most commonly seen anomalies were sacral dimple, accessory nipple, acrochordon, hypospadias, open spinal dysraphism, and accessory tragus. None of the newborns with cutaneous anomalies had any association.

Conclusions Although congenital cutaneous anomalies are rare in newborns, clinicians should be aware of them as they may be in association with syndromes and other medical conditions. It is also important to give appropriately provided information to avoid parents concerns.

Keywords

newborn - cutaneous anomalies - sacral dimple - accessory nipple - accessory tragus
 

  • References

  • 1 Monteagudo B, Labandeira J, León-Muiños E , et al. Frequency of birthmarks and transient skin lesions in newborns according to maternal factors (diseases, drugs, dietary supplements, and tobacco). Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2011; 77 (4) 535
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Sachdeva M, Kaur S, Nagpal M, Dewan SP. Cutaneous lesions in new born. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2002; 68 (6) 334-337
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Zagne V, Fernandes NC. Dermatoses in the first 72 h of life: a clinical and statistical survey. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2011; 77 (4) 470-476
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Haveri FT, Inamadar AC. A cross-sectional prospective study of cutaneous lesions in newborn. ISRN Dermatol [eCollection] 2014. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3918370/pdf/ISRN.DERMATOLOGY2014-360590.pdf Accessed December 22, 2014
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Gokdemir G, Erdogan HK, Köşlü A, Baksu B. Cutaneous lesions in Turkish neonates born in a teaching hospital. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2009; 75 (6) 638
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Ferahbas A, Utas S, Akcakus M, Gunes T, Mistik S. Prevalence of cutaneous findings in hospitalized neonates: a prospective observational study. Pediatr Dermatol 2009; 26 (2) 139-142
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ekiz O, Gül U, Mollamahmutoğlu L, Gönül M. Skin findings in newborns and their relationship with maternal factors: observational research. Ann Dermatol 2013; 25 (1) 1-4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Sarikaya Solak S, Tukenmez Demirci G, Kivanc Altunay I, Kucukunal A. The relationship of birthmarks observed in 1000 Newborns with neonatal/maternal parameters: A prospective and cross-sectional study. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2013; 33: 1388-1394
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 McGovern M, Mulligan S, Carney O, Wall D, Moylett E. Ultrasound investigation of sacral dimples and other stigmata of spinal dysraphism. Arch Dis Child 2013; 98 (10) 784-786
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kriss VM, Desai NS. Occult spinal dysraphism in neonates: assessment of high-risk cutaneous stigmata on sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171 (6) 1687-1692
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Robinson AJ, Russell S, Rimmer S. The value of ultrasonic examination of the lumbar spine in infants with specific reference to cutaneous markers of occult spinal dysraphism. Clin Radiol 2005; 60 (1) 72-77
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Urbani CE, Betti R. Accessory mammary tissue associated with congenital and hereditary nephrourinary malformations. Int J Dermatol 1996; 35 (5) 349-352
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ferrara P, Giorgio V, Vitelli O , et al. Polythelia: still a marker of urinary tract anomalies in children?. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2009; 43 (1) 47-50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Grimshaw EC, Cohen PR. Supernumerary nipple and seminoma: case report and review of polythelia and genitourinary cancers. Dermatol Online J 2013; 19 (1) 4
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kugelman A, Hadad B, Ben-David J, Podoshin L, Borochowitz Z, Bader D. Preauricular tags and pits in the newborn: the role of hearing tests. Acta Paediatr 1997; 86 (2) 170-172
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Bahrani B, Khachemoune A. Review of accessory tragus with highlights of its associated syndromes. Int J Dermatol 2014; 53 (12) 1442-1446
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Scheinfeld NS, Silverberg NB, Weinberg JM, Nozad V. The preauricular sinus: a review of its clinical presentation, treatment, and associations. Pediatr Dermatol 2004; 21 (3) 191-196
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Roth DA, Hildesheimer M, Bardenstein S , et al. Preauricular skin tags and ear pits are associated with permanent hearing impairment in newborns. Pediatrics 2008; 122 (4) e884-e890
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Beder LB, Kemaloğlu YK, Maral I, Serdaroğlu A, Bumin MA. A study on the prevalence of accessory auricle anomaly in Turkey. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2002; 63 (1) 25-27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Firat Y, Sireci S, Yakinci C , et al. Isolated preauricular pits and tags: is it necessary to investigate renal abnormalities and hearing impairment?. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2008; 265 (9) 1057-1060
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Leung AK, Robson WL. Association of preauricular sinuses and renal anomalies. Urology 1992; 40 (3) 259-261
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kohelet D, Arbel E. A prospective search for urinary tract abnormalities in infants with isolated preauricular tags. Pediatrics 2000; 105 (5) E61
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Wang RY, Earl DL, Ruder RO, Graham Jr JM. Syndromic ear anomalies and renal ultrasounds. Pediatrics 2001; 108 (2) E32
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Deshpande SA, Watson H. Renal ultrasonography not required in babies with isolated minor ear anomalies. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2006; 91 (1) F29-F30
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Tsai FJ, Tsai CH. Birthmarks and congenital skin lesions in Chinese newborns. J Formos Med Assoc 1993; 92 (9) 838-841
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Browning JC. Aplasia cutis congenita: approach to evaluation and management. Dermatol Ther 2013; 26 (6) 439-444
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Kraft KH, Shukla AR, Canning DA. Hypospadias. Urol Clin North Am 2010; 37 (2) 167-181
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Kass E, Kogan SJ, Manley C ; American Academy of Pediatrics. Timing of elective surgery on the genitalia of male children with particular reference to the risks, benefits, and psychological effects of surgery and anesthesia. Pediatrics 1996; 97 (4) 590-594
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Bellet JS. Developmental anomalies of the skin. Semin Perinatol 2013; 37 (1) 20-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Mueller DT, Callanan VP. Congenital malformations of the oral cavity. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2007; 40 (1) 141-160 , vii
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar