Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2016; 33(01): 047-056
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1556756
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Identifying Barriers to Initiating Minimal Enteral Feedings in Very Low-Birth-Weight Infants: A Mixed Methods Approach

Yogangi Malhotra
1   Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
,
Nneka Nzegwu
2   Department of Pediatric Newborn Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Jamie Harrington
3   Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
,
Richard A. Ehrenkranz
4   Section of Neonatal Perinatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
,
Janet P. Hafler
5   Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

06 January 2015

27 May 2015

Publication Date:
14 July 2015 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective This study aims to elicit physician and nursing perceptions about initiation of minimal enteral feedings (MEF) in very low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants.

Study Design A three-phase, mixed methods study including a quantitative chart review of 37 VLBW infants, followed by 26 qualitative observations of morning rounds, 26 interviews of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) medical team members, tailored interventions based on the identified barriers to MEF, and finally a postintervention chart audit of 50 VLBW infants.

Results The main barriers to initiation of MEF were failure to appreciate the differences between the goals of MEF versus nutritive feedings, inconsistent definition of “sick” infant, indomethacin for intraventricular hemorrhage prophylaxis, awaiting mother's own milk, complicated feeding protocols/algorithms for feeding intolerance, and lack of buy-in from nurses/nurse practitioners. The compliance with early initiation of MEF per the feeding guidelines rose from 25 to 92% after our interventions.

Conclusion Understanding the complex interplay of provider, system and patient-based factors that interfere with initiation of MEF may enable NICUs to develop consensus guidelines and targeted interventions and to achieve timely initiation of nonnutritive feedings.

Keywords

enteral nutrition - nonnutritive feedings - trophic feedings - extrauterine growth restriction - feeding protocol
 

  • References

  • 1 Ehrenkranz RA, Younes N, Lemons JA , et al. Longitudinal growth of hospitalized very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 1999; 104 (2 Pt 1): 280-289
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Embleton NE, Pang N, Cooke RJ. Postnatal malnutrition and growth retardation: an inevitable consequence of current recommendations in preterm infants?. Pediatrics 2001; 107 (2) 270-273
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Ehrenkranz RA, Dusick AM, Vohr BR, Wright LL, Wrage LA, Poole WK. Growth in the neonatal intensive care unit influences neurodevelopmental and growth outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2006; 117 (4) 1253-1261
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Frondas-Chauty A, Simon L, Branger B , et al. Early growth and neurodevelopmental outcome in very preterm infants: impact of gender. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2014; 99 (5) F366-F372
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Olsen IE, Richardson DK, Schmid CH, Ausman LM, Dwyer JT. Intersite differences in weight growth velocity of extremely premature infants. Pediatrics 2002; 110 (6) 1125-1132
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Klingenberg C, Embleton ND, Jacobs SE, O'Connell LA, Kuschel CA. Enteral feeding practices in very preterm infants: an international survey. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2012; 97 (1) F56-F61
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Schanler RJ, Shulman RJ, Lau C, Smith EO, Heitkemper MM. Feeding strategies for premature infants: randomized trial of gastrointestinal priming and tube-feeding method. Pediatrics 1999; 103 (2) 434-439
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Ehrenkranz RA. Early, aggressive nutritional management for very low birth weight infants: what is the evidence?. Semin Perinatol 2007; 31 (2) 48-55
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Martin CR, Brown YF, Ehrenkranz RA , et al; Extremely Low Gestational Age Newborns Study Investigators. Nutritional practices and growth velocity in the first month of life in extremely premature infants. Pediatrics 2009; 124 (2) 649-657
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Dinerstein A, Nieto RM, Solana CL, Perez GP, Otheguy LE, Larguia AM. Early and aggressive nutritional strategy (parenteral and enteral) decreases postnatal growth failure in very low birth weight infants. J Perinatol 2006; 26 (7) 436-442
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Berseth CL, Nordyke C. Enteral nutrients promote postnatal maturation of intestinal motor activity in preterm infants. Am J Physiol 1993; 264 (6 Pt 1): G1046-G1051
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Slagle TA, Gross SJ. Effect of early low-volume enteral substrate on subsequent feeding tolerance in very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr 1988; 113 (3) 526-531
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Lucas A, Bloom SR, Aynsley-Green A. Gut hormones and ‘minimal enteral feeding’. Acta Paediatr Scand 1986; 75 (5) 719-723
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Simpson C, Schanler RJ, Lau C. Early introduction of oral feeding in preterm infants. Pediatrics 2002; 110 (3) 517-522
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Moss RL, Kalish LA, Duggan C , et al. Clinical parameters do not adequately predict outcome in necrotizing enterocolitis: a multi-institutional study. J Perinatol 2008; 28 (10) 665-674
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Fukatsu K, Lundberg AH, Hanna MK , et al. Route of nutrition influences intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression and neutrophil accumulation in intestine. Arch Surg 1999; 134 (10) 1055-1060
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Kudsk KA. Effect of route and type of nutrition on intestine-derived inflammatory responses. Am J Surg 2003; 185 (1) 16-21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Cakmak Celik F, Aygun C, Cetinoglu E. Does early enteral feeding of very low birth weight infants increase the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis?. Eur J Clin Nutr 2009; 63 (4) 580-584
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Morgan J, Bombell S, McGuire W. Early trophic feeding versus enteral fasting for very preterm or very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 3: CD000504
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Morgan J, Young L, McGuire W. Delayed introduction of progressive enteral feeds to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 12: CD001970
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 McCallie KR, Lee HC, Mayer O, Cohen RS, Hintz SR, Rhine WD. Improved outcomes with a standardized feeding protocol for very low birth weight infants. J Perinatol 2011; 31 (Suppl. 01) S61-S67
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB. Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA 1995; 274 (9) 700-705
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Albright K, Gechter K, Kempe A. Importance of mixed methods in pragmatic trials and dissemination and implementation research. Acad Pediatr 2013; 13 (5) 400-407
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research. New Jersey, NJ: Aldine Transaction; 1967
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Cochrane LJ, Olson CA, Murray S, Dupuis M, Tooman T, Hayes S. Gaps between knowing and doing: understanding and assessing the barriers to optimal health care. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2007; 27 (2) 94-102
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Miles MB, Huberman MA. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. California, CA: Sage Publications; 1994
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Nzegwu NI, Malhotra Y, Ehrenkranz RA. Early enteral nutrition in Preterm Infants <1250 grams: A Quality Improvement Initiative in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Abstract presented at: the Annual Eastern SPR Poster Session; Mar 21–23, 2014; Philadelphia, PA
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Curry LA, Nembhard IM, Bradley EH. Qualitative and mixed methods provide unique contributions to outcomes research. Circulation 2009; 119 (10) 1442-1452
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Bradley EH, Curry LA, Webster TR , et al. Achieving rapid door-to-balloon times: how top hospitals improve complex clinical systems. Circulation 2006; 113 (8) 1079-1085
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

    • References

    • 1 Schanler RJ, Shulman RJ, Lau C. Feeding strategies for premature infants: beneficial outcomes of feeding fortified human milk versus preterm formula. Pediatrics 1999; 103 (6 Pt 1): 1150-1157
      CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
    • 2 Schanler RJ, Shulman RJ, Lau C, Smith EO, Heitkemper MM. Feeding strategies for premature infants: randomized trial of gastrointestinal priming and tube-feeding method. Pediatrics 1999; 103 (2) 434-439
      CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
    • 3 Mihatsch WA, von Schoenaich P, Fahnenstich H , et al. Randomized, multicenter trial of two different formulas for very early enteral feeding advancement in extremely-low-birth-weight infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2001; 33 (2) 155-159
      CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
    • 4 Mihatsch WA, Franz AR, Högel J, Pohlandt F. Hydrolyzed protein accelerates feeding advancement in very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2002; 110 (6) 1199-1203
      CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
    • 5 Mihatsch WA, von Schoenaich P, Fahnenstich H , et al. The significance of gastric residuals in the early enteral feeding advancement of extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2002; 109 (3) 457-459
      CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar