The Reverse-Flow Facial Artery Buccinator Flap for Skull Base Reconstruction: Key Anatomical and Technical Considerations

Abstract

Objective To highlight key anatomical and technical considerations for facial artery identification, and harvest and transposition of the facial artery buccinator (FAB) flap to facilitate its future use in anterior skull base reconstruction. Only a few studies have evaluated the reverse-flow FAB flap for skull base defects.

Design Eight FAB flaps were raised in four cadaveric heads and divided into thirds; the facial artery's course at the superior and inferior borders of the flap was measured noting in which incisional third of the flap it laid. The flap's reach to the anterior cranial fossa, sella turcica, clival recess, and contralateral cribriform plate were studied. A clinical case and operative video are also presented.

Results The facial artery had a near vertical course and stayed with the middle (⅝) or posterior third (⅜) of the flap in the inferior and superior incisions. Seven of eight flaps covered the sellar/planar regions. Only four of eight flaps covered the contralateral cribriform region. Lastly, none reached the middle third of the clivus.

Conclusions The FAB flap requires an understanding of the facial artery's course, generally seen in the middle third of the flap, and is an appropriate alternative for sellar/planar and ipsilateral cribriform defects.

Keywords

skull base reconstruction - facial artery buccinator flap - cerebrospinal fluid leak - facial artery

• References

• 1 Kim GG, Hang AX, Mitchell CA, Zanation AM. Pedicled extranasal flaps in skull base reconstruction. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 74: 71-80
• 2 Pribaz J, Stephens W, Crespo L, Gifford G. A new intraoral flap: facial artery musculomucosal (FAMM) flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 90 (3) 421-429
• 3 Pribaz JJ, Meara JG, Wright S, Smith JD, Stephens W, Breuing KH. Lip and vermilion reconstruction with the facial artery musculomucosal flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (3) 864-872
• 4 Ayad T, Kolb F, De Monès E, Mamelle G, Tan HK, Temam S. Le lambeau musculomuqueux de buccinateur pédiculé sur l'artère faciale : technique de prélèvement et indications. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2008; 53 (6) 487-494
• 5 Dupoirieux L, Plane L, Gard C, Penneau M. Anatomical basis and results of the facial artery musculomucosal flap for oral reconstruction. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999; 37 (1) 25-28
• 6 Ayad T, Kolb F, De Monés E, Mamelle G, Temam S. Reconstruction of floor of mouth defects by the facial artery musculo-mucosal flap following cancer ablation. Head Neck 2008; 30 (4) 437-445
• 7 Rahpeyma A, Khajehahmadi S, Rezvani HN. Pedicle length in the inferiorly based buccinator myomucosal island flap: a cadaveric study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014; 43 (2) 173-176
• 8 Khan K, Hinckley V, Cassell O, Silva P, Winter S, Potter M. A novel use of the facial artery based buccinator musculo-mucosal island flap for reconstruction of the oropharynx. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013; 66 (10) 1365-1368
• 9 Van Lierop AC, Fagan JJ. Buccinator myomucosal flap: clinical results and review of anatomy, surgical technique and applications. J Laryngol Otol 2008; 122 (2) 181-187
• 10 Zhao Z, Li S, Yan Y , et al. New buccinator myomucosal island flap: anatomic study and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104 (1) 55-64
• 11 Ayad T, Xie L. Facial artery musculomucosal flap in head and neck reconstruction: A systematic review. Head Neck 2014;
• 12 Rivera-Serrano CM, Oliver CL, Sok J , et al. Pedicled facial buccinator (FAB) flap: a new flap for reconstruction of skull base defects. Laryngoscope 2010; 120 (10) 1922-1930
• 13 Xie L, Lavigne F, Rahal A, Moubayed SP, Ayad T. Facial artery musculomucosal flap for reconstruction of skull base defects: a cadaveric study. Laryngoscope 2013; 123 (8) 1854-1861
• 14 Koh KS, Kim HJ, Oh CS, Chung IH. Branching patterns and symmetry of the course of the facial artery in Koreans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; 32 (4) 414-418
• 15 Niranjan NS. An anatomical study of the facial artery. Ann Plast Surg 1988; 21 (1) 14-22
• 16 Mitz V, Ricbourg B, Lassau JP. Les branches faciales de l'artère faciale chez l'adulte. Typologie, variations et territoires cutanés respectifs. Ann Chir Plast 1973; 18 (4) 339-350
• 17 Lohn JW, Penn JW, Norton J, Butler PE. The course and variation of the facial artery and vein: implications for facial transplantation and facial surgery. Ann Plast Surg 2011; 67 (2) 184-188
• 18 Zhao Z, Li S, Xu J , et al. Color Doppler flow imaging of the facial artery and vein. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106 (6) 1249-1253
• 19 Gardner PA, Kassam AB, Thomas A , et al. Endoscopic endonasal resection of anterior cranial base meningiomas. Neurosurgery 2008; 63 (1) 36-52 ; discussion 52–54
• 20 Zanation AM, Thorp BD, Parmar P, Harvey RJ. Reconstructive options for endoscopic skull base surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2011; 44 (5) 1201-1222
• 21 Zanation AM, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Kassam AB, Gardner PA, Prevedello DM. Minimally invasive endoscopic pericranial flap: a new method for endonasal skull base reconstruction. Laryngoscope 2009; 119 (1) 13-18
• 22 O'Leary P, Bundgaard T. Good results in patients with defects after intraoral tumour excision using facial artery musculo-mucosal flap. Dan Med Bull 2011; 58 (5) A4264
• 23 Massarelli O, Baj A, Gobbi R , et al. Cheek mucosa: a versatile donor site of myomucosal flaps. Technical and functional considerations. Head Neck 2013; 35 (1) 109-117
• 24 Joshi A, Rajendraprasad JS, Shetty K. Reconstruction of intraoral defects using facial artery musculomucosal flap. Br J Plast Surg 2005; 58 (8) 1061-1066
• 25 Wolber A, Mallet Y, Avalos N, Martinot-Duquennoy V, Lefebvre JL. Etude de la sensibilité du lambeau de FAMM : à propos de 15 cas. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2009; 54 (2) 120-125
• 26 Eisma R, Wilkinson T. From “silent teachers” to models. PLoS Biol 2014; 12 (10) e1001971